ything about it without
reproducible bug reports.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
On 31/01/17 18:35, Matthew Patton wrote:
> I ran across this bug report
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1548434) and it
> seems in Wheezy/Jessie it's likewise. The last functional version I just so
> happened to hold onto is 7u79-2.5.5-1~deb7u1.
>
> The following
On 10/09/16 14:28, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10.09.2016 12:28, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 10/09/16 11:09, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> The ARM32 port already is in an upstream repository, and I'm told
>>> that the s390x is on it's way. Even if these ports will no
On 10/09/16 11:09, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The ARM32 port already is in an upstream repository, and I'm told
> that the s390x is on it's way. Even if these ports will not be
> merged before openjdk-10, it's my intent to build these from their
> branches, as done in the past with the AArch64 and
On 24/03/16 19:03, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Wheezy-LTS is going to start next month and there is the intention to
> switch the default-jre|jdk from OpenJDK 6 to OpenJDK 7 because the
> latter can be supported until Wheezy reaches EOL in 2018-05-31.
Yes! Good call.
While we are still supporting
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
How do automated builds factor into that?
I don't think it makes any difference. But IANAL, and you'd have to
read the TCK
On 01/22/2015 02:23 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
How do automated builds
On 19/01/15 11:35, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I've requested an access to the TCK for Java 8 in June to
run it on the Debian packages but I haven't heard back from Oracle yet.
I'd ping them again.
Andrew.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 19/01/15 00:20, Paul Wise wrote:
If there are individuals who have access to the TCK and could
validate the package and file bugs, that would be great.
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
Andrew.
--
To
On 04/11/2014 11:24 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
Op 2014-04-11 om 11:38 schreef mohamad.most...@uni-ulm.de:
Hi,
I am trying to install matlab under Linux and I am facing the
following message
Preparing installation files ...
Installing ...
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Could
On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 02:35:49PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
(With my Java hat on and my Release hat off)
We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and testing.
However, there is major blocker, which is
On 11/13/2013 07:45 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I have finally been able to fix openjdk-7 on mips and mipsel.
Brilliant!
On 13/11/13 09:10, Andrew Haley wrote:
That's an odd patch.
FWIW it looks right to me that something like this would
On 11/14/2013 11:53 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 14/11/13 09:26, Andrew Haley wrote:
[...] on kfreebsd we are also looking to switch to openjdk-7 as
soon as possible. And we were advised to send our patches
upstream also. I'd appreciate any advice on how to go about doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I have finally been able to fix openjdk-7 on mips and mipsel. It was a
problem of ugly casts done without taking care of alignement issues. See bug
#729448 for more details.
With the patch from
On 09/20/2013 08:48 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 20/09/2013 08:50, Florian Weimer a écrit :
Is this a bug in Netbeans or OpenJDK 6? If the latter, has it been
fixed upstream?
This is an OpenJDK 6 bug. It has been reported upstream and promptly
closed as 'Won't Fix'.
On 09/20/2013 08:48 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 20/09/2013 08:50, Florian Weimer a écrit :
Is this a bug in Netbeans or OpenJDK 6? If the latter, has it been
fixed upstream?
This is an OpenJDK 6 bug. It has been reported upstream and promptly
closed as 'Won't Fix'.
It's not marked as
On 08/19/2013 01:13 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
OpenJDK6 is obsolete
No it's not.
Andrew.
OpenJDK 6 Project Lead
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 02/04/2013 05:27 PM, Christian Bernardt wrote:
Debian squeeze does provide openjdk-6-jdk as part of its default-jdk
package. Here it can be seen that
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html Java 6 end of
support will be end of this month.
That's Oracle proprietary Java.
On 07/18/2012 02:02 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
- compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*)
The .jar.so files have no compile-time dependencies on anything.
All dependencies are resolved at runtime.
Andrew.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 05/12/2012 04:59 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Andrew Haley dixit:
Oh, gosh. As you say, it looks like strace isn't working. I can't
I managed to get further by usine -o but *not* -f (or -ff), since
using -o with -ff showed a child process’ log consisting exactly of:
--- SIGPWR (Power
On 05/14/2012 02:21 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
With that, “gcj-4.6 -c x.java” produces…
x.o: ELF 32-bit MSB relocatable, Motorola 68020, version 1 (SYSV), not
stripped
Ugh. So, now what.
God only knows. Your system is behaving in such a bizarre way that I
can't imagine what it's doing. I
On 05/14/2012 04:57 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Andrew Haley dixit:
Is this box reachable?
https://wiki.debian.org/Aranym/Quick can get you a VM that
behaves the same (it’s one of these).
Does it have a working gdb?
I think so. Andreas recently even fixed thread debugging,
though someone
On 05/09/2012 07:55 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Andrew Haley dixit:
gcj has an evil bug. Sometimes, when it has an unresolved reference, it
reports a ClassNotFoundException for the referring class, not the
referred. So, you now need to
Oh, ok.
jcf-dump -v -classpath /usr/share/java
On 05/10/2012 06:08 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Andrew Haley dixit:
Hmm. Well, I think we're very close and it would be a shame to stop
Oh, ok.
now. If you do an strace -f -etrace=file you should be able to see
what classes it's trying to load at the end, and one of these won't
On 05/06/2012 03:56 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
If someone has an idea how to debug this, you’re welcome.
Try running ecj1 like this:
gij -verbose:class -classpath /usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain \
Hello.java -g1
On 05/09/2012 12:58 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Andrew Haley dixit:
On 05/06/2012 03:56 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
If someone has an idea how to debug this, you’re welcome.
Try running ecj1 like this:
gij -verbose:class -classpath /usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar
On 05/09/2012 05:15 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Andrew Haley dixit:
OK:
gij-4.6 -verbose:class -classpath /usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain x.java -g1
-fbootclasspath=./:/usr/share/java/libgcj-4.6.jar -g1 -fsource=1.5
-ftarget=1.5
On 04/03/2012 12:29 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 31/03/2012 21:10, Andrew Haley a écrit :
While reading the authbind documentation I saw it was doing some fork
tricks behind the scene. Maybe the forked process can't allocate its
memory due to OpenVZ and quits?
Hold on, do you see
On 03/28/2012 11:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 28/03/2012 19:38, Andrew Haley a écrit :
If you run
strace -f -etrace=net java ...
you'll be able to see the bind call that fails, and we can take it
from there.
Thank you for the tip, I'll give it a try. I'm not familiar with strace
On 03/27/2012 10:12 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 20/03/2012 12:41, Andrew Haley a écrit :
Comments like this are infuriating. I want to make OpenJDK
competitive, but I can't do anything with this because I don't know
what you're talking about. I can't reproduce the problem, so I can't
fix
On 03/27/2012 10:12 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 20/03/2012 12:41, Andrew Haley a écrit :
Comments like this are infuriating. I want to make OpenJDK
competitive, but I can't do anything with this because I don't know
what you're talking about. I can't reproduce the problem, so I can't
fix
On 03/19/2012 07:11 PM, Barry Hawkins wrote:
The focus of my message was to point out the need for users of Debian
and its derivatives to be able to install an official JRE or JDK from
Oracle. If I gave the impression of criticizing OpenJDK, my apologies;
that was not the intent.
Like so
On 03/19/2012 02:04 PM, Barry Hawkins wrote:
For example, JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA, one of the main IDEs for Java
development, still doesn't endorse the use of OpenJDK. If you download
IDEA and launch it via a terminal, you will see the following warning:
~$ ./idea-IC-111.277/bin/idea.sh
On 03/08/2010 11:11 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Pablo Duboue wrote:
All right...
Then, maybe I could add a function to java-wrappers that would find
out what is a 'good default' for that parameter, getting something more
than the memory required but still reasonably less than the memory
On 01/06/2010 05:26 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
No I didn't see it. If it was only on the icedtea list then I
wouldn't have seen it as hotspot-dev is the only one of these
aliases that I'm on.
Oh darn, my mistake. The shiny new Reply List button on Thunderbird 3
didn't quite do what I
On 12/14/2009 04:58 PM, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:10:18PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
AFAIK, GCJ uses classpath library these days. The code from classpath
is being merged in GCJ. And from the status of classpath [1] it is
clear that
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
This raises a problem which I've hit quite a few times already: it is
a currently pain to find which java package holds which java classes.
It would be quite great to have
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
This raises a problem which I've hit quite a few times already: it is
a currently pain to find which java package holds which java classes.
It would be quite great to have the equivalent of apt-file for java
classes ;-)... (and that shouldn't be too difficult to write,
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
Sure, but that only works for installed packages, whereas its
utility would be much greater if it was based on some index of the
jars available in the Debian archive... (for the record, apt-file
Matthew Johnson wrote:
I've arranged for a Debian Java BOF at Debconf this year which I know many
people won't be at, so I'd like to have some sort of pre-discussion first.
There are a number of issues I'd like to try and sort out with packaging
policy, and actually try and get them baked
issues). Andrew
Haley did look at it. For now nobody was interested in working on the port.
That's right. It may be that the memory allocation is actually the only
problem, and everything else will work just fine, but PA-RISC is, as far as
I'm aware, only for legacy systems now.
Andrew
update.
OpenJDK is non-trivial. Andrew Haley did have a look at this and came to the
conclusion that the byte code interpreter for the zero port needs porting for
archs with upward growing stacks.
It might not be horribly difficult to fix. The crash comes when the VM
calls mprotect
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything from an outsider that could help?
I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has,
in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen this on-and-off again on the hppa-linux port. The issue has,
in my experience, been a compiler problem. My standard operating
procedure is to methodically add volatile to the atomic.h
Michael Schutte wrote:
Hi Javaists,
[Please Cc me on replies, I’m not subscribed]
Could one of you be so kind and check my proposed QA upload of trang
fixing #478187? The error occurs because gcj hides an internal package
of trang behind a built-in one, which causes the very fancy
Richard wrote:
This is a bit of a newby question.
What I'm wondering is whether one can use the debian package system as
a kind of build system. Let me illustrate with an example, say for
example I want to write an app and package it with debian and this app
uses Hibernate, then I would
Martin Guy wrote:
Hi!
I see gcj/gij/java-gcj-compat are now disabled on arm, and that
dependent packages are being asked to exclude them as Build-Deps to
eliminate java library bindings.
Are they believed to work in the armel port?
Yes. As far as I'm aware gcj works 100% on armel.
Riku Voipio wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
The following source packages are unbuildable and out of date on
arm, thus blocking testing transition. It seems unlikely that java will
properly work on oldabi arm, so please remove these for starters.
Are we only talking
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
Riku Voipio wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
The following source packages are unbuildable and out of date on
arm, thus blocking testing transition. It seems unlikely that java will
properly work on oldabi arm, so please remove
Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE Application error
!STACK
Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE
Michael Koch wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:38PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello,
A while ago, I wrote:
Using the following pakages:
* java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2
* ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1
* libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3
*
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE Application error
!STACK 1
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
And what was the reason? I need to know.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196
!MESSAGE Application error
!STACK
Andrew Haley wrote:
There are areas where compliant jvms might behave differently. For
example, the exact time when dependent classes are loaded isn't defined.
Maybe at class initialization time, maybe later. All the the spec
requires is that ClassNotFoundExceptions aren't raised until
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
Runtime.exit()?
I tried to debug this but I dont found
Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello,
A while ago, I wrote:
Using the following pakages:
* java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2
* ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1
* libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3
* gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3
* gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1, libgcj7-1
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
Runtime.exit()?
I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called
with code 13.
What went wrong with the debugging
Daniel Leidert wrote:
The arm-buildd failed to build docbook-xsl-saxon(-gcj) with an illegal
instruction error. You can find the build log at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=docbook-xsl-saxon;ver=1.00.dfsg.1-3;arch=arm;stamp=1202259174
A bug in GIJ? Anybody an idea? I do not have
Matthew Johnson wrote:
I have a package which compiles in the sid java-gcj-compat-dev, but only
runs with sun java (or, I assume, IBM, but since IBM isn't in the
archive, I don't think it's all that important to cater for). I've filed
bugs against gcj, which have been fixed upstream, and it
Egon Willighagen writes:
On Jan 7, 2008 10:22 AM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/7, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I understand, but do we really have other possible ways?
Not moving packages that work only with icedtea to main at the moment.
What are the
Michael Koch writes:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:22:42AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
2008/1/7, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
You know that even GCJ is not working on all our platforms?
Yes I know and for those platforms, I don't see a problem moving the
package to
Onkar Shinde writes:
On Dec 20, 2007 3:23 PM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/12/19, Onkar Shinde [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am a java developer who is learning debian packaging these days. I
am trying to fix some FTBFS of java related packages in Ubuntu.
Some recent
Onkar Shinde writes:
On Dec 20, 2007 3:47 PM, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Onkar Shinde writes:
On Dec 20, 2007 3:23 PM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/12/19, Onkar Shinde [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am a java developer who is learning debian packaging
Anthony Green writes:
Andrew Haley wrote:
OK, so you're not picking up the precompiled classes for some reason.
Not good, but the fact that the CPU is only at 5% indicates that isn't
the core problem.
I believe that the problem lies in our NIO implementation. I don't know
Shaun Jackman writes:
Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
terribly slowly with the
java-gcj-compat JVM and works fine with Sun's JVM. If anyone has any
thoughts on why this might be the case, or has some time to
investigate, I'd appreciate the help in solving
Shaun Jackman writes:
On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 AM, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun Jackman writes:
Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
terribly slowly with the
java-gcj-compat JVM and works fine with Sun's JVM. If anyone has any
Shaun Jackman writes:
On Nov 21, 2007 11:30 AM, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun Jackman writes:
On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 AM, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun Jackman writes:
Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
Arnaud Vandyck writes:
Hi all,
I was reading some bug reports and I don't know if Andrew, Marc or
other gcj dev were aware of a problem we have with dom4j that could be
a gcj thread problem:
Debian Bug report logs - #427456
dom4j: FTBFS: org.dom4j.ThreadingTest times out
Marcus Better writes:
I have recently had problems building Java packages. The build would just
eat memory, and occasionally show things like:
GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 524288000):
May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
GC
Michael Koch writes:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:27:22PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:28:09PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Am I missing something? Isn't Sun's Java 6 in Debian still in non-free?!
It is. And it will never move to main.
Jörg Sommer writes:
is this a bug in java or in the application?
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: getenv
getenv was deprecated, removed, and then re-added in Java 1.5.
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4199068
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
Mark Wielaard writes:
Only bootstraps on Fedora 7 for now, but we are making (very) slow
progress to get things to build fully on Debian also.
Ofergoodnessake, it's been three whole days! :-)
Andrew.
--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4
1TE,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In my opinion, Java libraries without stable interfaces shouldn't be
deployed in free OSes. If they are to be used, you're going to have
to change the jar name, but even that may not work: if you use such a
library
Marcus Better writes:
Andrew Haley wrote:
In my opinion, Java libraries without stable interfaces shouldn't be
deployed in free OSes.
That's a nice goal but unfortunately the world is not so perfect,
because users occasionally require new software with shiny new
bells and whistles
Mike Hommey writes:
I have a java library package, called libmozillainterfaces-java,
that is provided by xulrunner. I'm currently working on a new
upstream release of xulrunner which changed the java interfaces:
some interfaces changed namespaces, so you have to do changes to
your
Paul Cager writes:
* Using the strings command seems to me a bit unsafe, in that you
could get false positives if there are (normal) strings that end in
class. I'm not sure if that is a real-life concern, or just my
over-active imagination.
It's unsafe. strings prints the printable
Matthew Johnson writes:
Ideally
I'd write (not in bash) a real byte-code parser which can find the class
references properly.
$ jcf-dump --print-constants java.lang.Object | grep 'Class name:'
#2: Class name: 1=java/lang/Object
#8: Class name: 7=java/lang/Throwable
#18: Class name:
Arnaud Vandyck writes:
On 12/6/06, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Generally speaking yes, but the Debian Java Policy suggests, that class
files should be removed from upstream release [1].
That advice is plain wrong. (And it's not part of the
Matthew Johnson writes:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
libswt-gtk-3.2-java32
libswt-gtk-3.2-java64
libswt-gtk-3.2-java
Any other suggestions, or completely different approaches?
This seems like a really bad solution.
The package is architecture
Matthias Klose writes:
Arnaud Vandyck writes:
Hi debian-java team,
I'd like us to write a common position statement about the jdk under
the gpl. I think these points should be mentioned:
o This is really a good thing for us because it is now really the GPL
(+Classpath
Marcus Better writes:
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
However it requires Java 5.0 and I haven't found any information if
there is a 5.0 compatible free java compiler available.
I don't think so, but check GCJ upstream. It's not just the compiler, but
also the class library that needs to
Matthias Klose writes:
- arm: debian only port, not yet submitted to upstream; runtime is
currently non-functional, testsuite shows failures for all
interpreter test cases.
#388505: segfaults in gcj-dbtool-4.1, not addressed.
Going back to gcj-4.0 for arm could be an
Egon Willighagen writes:
cc: debian-java - I need a bit of help here, see below
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 15:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Unfortunately, JGR is still somewhat outside Debian as it wants Sun's
| Java JDK so I don't think I'll ever package it directly. Now, if
Egon Willighagen writes:
On Sunday 22 October 2006 11:51, Andrew Haley wrote:
But it fails because of this call:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/bin/javac -target 1.4 -source
1.4 -target 1.4 -source 1.4 -classpath src/JRI.jar -d examples
examples/rtest.java
MrDemeanour writes:
Tom Marble wrote:
Marcus Better wrote:
the pkg-jboss project needs DFSG-free versions of Sun's JavaMail
and Java Activation Framework libraries. Can anyone tell me whether
the GNU versions (already in Debian) will work out of the box?
Why not use Sun's
Timo Juhani Lindfors writes:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
It certainly doesn't appear on the FSF list of free licences. It is,
Hmm, to me it seems that oddly enough FSF considers it free:
$ lynx -dump http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license
Pierre Métras writes:
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
Beside that I recognize the value a Java Developer Guide could have.
I definitely agree, many thanks Pierre for volunteer :-D
OK, I volunteer but I'll start small, improving the wiki content when I find
some time...
Mladen Adamovic writes:
robin putters wrote:
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental,
while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
Mladen Adamovic writes:
Andrew Haley wrote:
Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
(Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
useless. Shame on them
Re debugging info -- I put this patch into ecj on Fedora:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-January/msg00086.html
This patch means that no matter what broken debug options are in Ant
scripts, every Java program in an RPM has full debuginfo.
Essentially, this turns a
Andrew Haley writes:
Re debugging info -- I put this patch into ecj on Fedora:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-January/msg00086.html
This patch means that no matter what broken debug options are in Ant
scripts, every Java program in an RPM has full
CasperLinux writes:
I think you misunderstood my purpose:
On Monday 27 February 2006 10:03, Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 07:51:10AM -0500, CasperLinux wrote:
I am starting to learn programming Java (and programming in general for
that matter). I'd like to use my
Michael Koch writes:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:45:43AM -0500, Daniel Risacher wrote:
While using gdb to debug my native-compiled application, I can step,
backtrace, examine local variables, etc.
But I cannot seem to invoke a method - doing so causes a segfault.
i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So now I'm using the Debian Eclipse packages with J2SDK 1.5. All the new
language features are supported perfectly, and the overall performance
seems much better. I hope you guys are not angry about that, but for me
using Sun's proprietary Java VM is just the
Daniel Risacher writes:
I recently started developing with gcj on debian and wanted to use
gdb for debugging, but I've struggled a bit with it. I had actually
composed a lengthy set of questions to ask here on the list, but in
writing the email, I stumbled across the answer, which I
I have succesfully built JOnAS on FC5. There are a lot of
dependencies.
The FC5 packages I needed to install for the build were:
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api.i386 5.0.30-8jpp_9fc
jdom.noarch 1.0-1jpp_2fc.1
werken.xpath.noarch 0.9.4-0.beta.9jpp_2fc
velocity.noarch 1.4-3jpp_3fc
struts.i386
Michael Koch writes:
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:02:22PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
If anybody here has the time to look into this GCJ ICE, I'd greatly
appreciate it.
You should file/report such bugs upstream (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/).
Most of the upstream people are RH
Wolfgang Baer writes:
Hi Praveen,
êðõ ã Ï (Praveen A) wrote:
2006/1/20, êðõ ã Ï (Praveen A) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I' m trying to figure out how to build jonas for debian. I am a newbie
to debian packaging. If anyone alse is working on the same thing it would
great
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
