Le samedi 6 février 2021, 13:28:11 CET Sandro Knauß a écrit :
> Hey Norbert,
>
> > Should we cherry-pick the relevant fix commit
> > https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfig/commit/b57c7ad9acf45928a6debefcd
> > 43 2cc50432fefdb
>
> Yes we should cherry-pick this one.
For the record, this has
Hey Norbert,
> Should we cherry-pick the relevant fix commit
> https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfig/commit/b57c7ad9acf45928a6debefcd43
> 2cc50432fefdb
Yes we should cherry-pick this one.
hefee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Sandro,
great find!
> [2] https://bugs.kde.org/430521
Should we cherry-pick the relevant fix commit
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfig/commit/b57c7ad9acf45928a6debefcd432cc50432fefdb
Sounds like a useful addition...
WDYT?
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert
:
> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:57:23 PM CET Sandro Knauß wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > > Now, since the constant opening of kmail2 in full screen mode is quite a
> > > pita, I went in system settings and created the rule from there, and
> > > then
> > &
On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:57:23 PM CET Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Now, since the constant opening of kmail2 in full screen mode is quite a
> > pita, I went in system settings and created the rule from there, and then
> > did the action taking a snapshot o
Hey,
> Now, since the constant opening of kmail2 in full screen mode is quite a
> pita, I went in system settings and created the rule from there, and then
> did the action taking a snapshot of the windows properties, and then
> selected "force" for the window size.
>
arameters I want it to assume, and
> then:
>
> dah-dah! Nothing. Nothing it registered at the name "Kmail", or "Kmail2" as
> the dialog called it.
>
> I already have four of them, three of them long standing, and one newly
> created, for firefox, which was s
usually do in that specific situation, and then the "settings" window is
gone, just as it does nowadays, and then I go in "settings" and "windows
rules", in order to set the specific parameters I want it to assume, and then:
dah-dah! Nothing. Nothing it registered at the name &q
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libqt5network5
Bug #908649 [kmail] kmail2: kmail - TLS negotiation was unsuccessful
Bug reassigned from package 'kmail' to 'libqt5network5'.
No longer marked as found in versions kmail/4:17.12.3-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #908
Control: reassign -1 libqt5network5
Control: forcemerge 907774 -1
Control: affects -1 907774 kmail owncloud-client quassel
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:37:01PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Hans,
> > Does upgrading libqt5network5 to the version in unstable fix the problem?
> >
> thank you
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:26:04AM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Package: kmail
> Version: 4:17.12.3-1
> Severity: important
> File: kmail2
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> running debian/testing running kmail I can not get mails from the mailserver.
>
> It looks like t
I suppose, the problem is that openssl minimum protocoll version changed
to 1.2 and your mail server supports only 1.0.
You could probably restore the old version by changing the last section
of /etc/sll/openssl.cnf from
[system_default_sect]
MinProtocol = TLSv1.2
CipherString =
Package: kmail
Version: 4:17.12.3-1
Severity: important
File: kmail2
Dear Maintainer,
running debian/testing running kmail I can not get mails from the mailserver.
It looks like this is the same problem, which appewared in 2016.
Please see the description of the bug here:
https://bugs.kde.org
Package: kmail
Version: 4:17.08.3-2
Severity: wishlist
File: kmail2
Dear Maintainer,
kamil version prior to the actual one showed the number of unread mails in the
little icon in the taskbar. This feature is gone since the actual version.
IMO and maybe in others people,too, this is a very
Hi Hans,
as Pino said, you should wait for kmail2 to enter testing.
I use kdepim modules from unstable with german translation ok.
So either wait or move to unstable.
Reinhard
Am Samstag, 30. Dezember 2017, 10:14:40 CET schrieben Sie:
Hi Pino,
I admit, that I may missed something. Sorry the annoyance, I just wanted to
help. So I will wait for the next package generation and hope for the best.
However, thanks for enlightening me and please aplologize the noise.
Have
On sabato 30 dicembre 2017 08:57:35 CET Hans wrote:
> Hmm, so this is a feature not a bug? IMHO this feature makes things not
> better
> but worse. So what is the alternative? Translate for myself or are there
> alternative packages?
Or read what I already wrote when I closed this bug:
| This
Hmm, so this is a feature not a bug? IMHO this feature makes things not better
but worse. So what is the alternative? Translate for myself or are there
alternative packages?
Please apologize, but when a new package is missing an essentiell function
(and localisation and translation is indeed
On venerdì 29 dicembre 2017 23:05:09 CET Hans wrote:
> please note, that this bug is in version 17.08.3, too. I installed it and got
> the same problem as described. Maybe you might want to recheck this, before
> it
> goes into testing. Maybe this bugreport should be reopened?
The version
Hi Pino,
please note, that this bug is in version 17.08.3, too. I installed it and got
the same problem as described. Maybe you might want to recheck this, before it
goes into testing. Maybe this bugreport should be reopened?
Best regards
Hans
> This was done on purpose, because (hopefully
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:31:28 +0100
with message-id <5367432.DlsfglL3Kv@pendragon>
and subject line Re: Bug#885618: kde-l10n-de lacks German translation for kmail2
has caused the Debian Bug report #885618,
regarding kde-l10n-de lacks German translation for kmail2
to be
Package: kde-l10n-de
Version: 4:16.04.3-8
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed, that the latest version of kde-l10n-de lacks the German translation
of kmail2 (maybe others,too).
This is in version kde-l10n-de_16.04.3-9, whilst the former version
kde-l10n-de_16.04.3-8 is running fine
Package: kmail
Version: 4:16.04.3-4
Severity: normal
File: kmail2
Dear Maintainer,
I discovered, that the spamfilter rule (fight spam) does not work properly. The
rule says:
MOVE recognized spam to folder xx
but actually it does
COPY reconized spam to folder xxx
To vrify this, I
Package: kmail
Version: 4:16.04.3-4
Severity: normal
File: kmail2
Dear Maintainer,
it looks like, this bug appears again now in debian/testing:
http://kdepim-bugs.kde.narkive.com/Zs7S2ZX9/kmail2-bug-359957-new-cannot-create-new-folders-in-top-level-local-folders
Maybe it is the same bug
it is not Netbeans but simply Java (OpenJDK 8 here) - I can't say.
However, there seems to be a shmem limit since a few weeks that hasn't been
there before.
Any idea how to proceed ?
Tim
On Thursday 08 October 2015 11:42:25 Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> > since I installed kde5 I have a
to proceed ?
>
> Tim
>
> On Thursday 08 October 2015 11:42:25 Boris Pek wrote:
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > > since I installed kde5 I have a kmail2 issue.
> > >
> > > After a while the kmail2 display window becomes drawn unreadable.
> > > See
Hi Tim,
> since I installed kde5 I have a kmail2 issue.
>
> After a while the kmail2 display window becomes drawn unreadable.
> See this screenshot:
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_loju3MX2rTZlNOdDRxblVTWDg
>
> Stopping and starting kmail does not help.
> Stoppin
Hi Tim,
> since I installed kde5 I have a kmail2 issue.
>
> After a while the kmail2 display window becomes drawn unreadable.
> See this screenshot:
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_loju3MX2rTZlNOdDRxblVTWDg
>
> Stopping and starting kmail does not help.
> Stoppin
a look !
Tim
On Thursday 08 October 2015 11:42:25 Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> > since I installed kde5 I have a kmail2 issue.
> >
> > After a while the kmail2 display window becomes drawn unreadable.
> > See this screenshot:
> > https://drive.google.com/
Hi,
since I installed kde5 I have a kmail2 issue.
After a while the kmail2 display window becomes drawn unreadable.
See this screenshot:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_loju3MX2rTZlNOdDRxblVTWDg
Stopping and starting kmail does not help.
Stopping and starting kdm helps for a while (until
Hi,
most of my mail is delivered to /var/mail/matthias by exim, and I'm using
kmail to read it. This worked pretty much out of the box with Wheezy. After
upgrading to Jessie, I created an extra receiving account for
/var/mail/matthias, which is causing problems: Mails, which I already did read
of old messages, which
are (of course) also marked unread.
Is this still an issue with the current kmail (4.14) or akonadi (1.13)?
The issue went on-and-off over a lot of time, and in the end I've given up on
trusting kmail2 with my read/unread marks; so it was hard to me to answer
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:40:48 +0200 Shai Berger s...@platonix.com wrote:
Package: kmail
Version: 4:4.11.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
KMail randomly marks single messages as unread. This makes my
normal workflow, where I leave messages
Package: kmail
Version: 4:4.11.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
KMail randomly marks single messages as unread. This makes my
normal workflow, where I leave messages unread for later, deeper
consideration, tedious and bordering on impossible.
folder
subscriptions, but I have them disabled and don't want to add them.
Any suggestions how to get kmail to acknowledge the new folder?
Cheers,
Johannes
On Thursday 22 August 2013 20:03:40 Johannes Zarl wrote:
Hi,
Since the upgrade to kmail2 (the migration went really smooth by the way
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:37:02 +0300
David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote:
On Thursday, 22 August, 2013 20:03:40 Johannes Zarl wrote:
Hi,
Since the upgrade to kmail2 (the migration went really smooth by
the way), kmail shows some quirks on my system:
1) After logging into the desktop
Hi,
Since the upgrade to kmail2 (the migration went really smooth by the way),
kmail shows some quirks on my system:
1) After logging into the desktop session, kmail needs 1-2 minutes until the
window appears, and a little while longer until the folders are ready. During
that time
On Thursday, 22 August, 2013 20:03:40 Johannes Zarl wrote:
Hi,
Since the upgrade to kmail2 (the migration went really smooth by the way),
kmail shows some quirks on my system:
1) After logging into the desktop session, kmail needs 1-2 minutes until the
window appears, and a little while
In data mercoledì 14 agosto 2013 18:36:22, David Baron ha scritto:
Might need a different mail program unless our beloved kmail is
brought back from the abyss.
Don't worry, certainly Kmail2 (or 3) will be ready for Debian 8.0.
regards
--
Marco Valli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde
. memory use is MUCH higher than it was with kmail1 according to ps_mem.
kmail1 would sit at arround 512MB on a good day, and 1GB~ when things started
going wrong, or I decided to open a bunch of large folders. kmail2 starts at
512MB by its lonesome, is at 768MB right now, and will grow larger
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 01:08:35 Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
I have several pop accounts setup to filter messages into a large list
of mailing list folders, and a bunch of messages are getting dup'ed.
Same here for filtering on IMAP accounts. I've moved most of my
filtering to the IMAP
Temporarily losing messages until program restart.
All those old messages mysteriously once again unread.
KMail resource, broken, online until next kde start.
Kmail2 is a mess bordering on unusability. Cant search
messages without Nepomuk but we all know the mess that is. I
use recoll on files
On Friday 10 May 2013 18:44:40 Diederik de Haas wrote:
Try looking in system settings Account Details KDE Wallet Access
Control,
That shows in interesting picture ... I have quite a lot of email related
items in there (all set to Always Allow) and a whole bunch of them look
like
On Thursday, 09 May, 2013 23:51:00 Josep Febrer wrote:
On Thursday 09 May 2013 19:00:38 David Baron wrote:
I have the new kmail up and running.
First questions:
How do I import my old filters?
Have you exported them before?
If so you can reimport them via Settings - Configure filters
On Friday, May 10, 2013 12:04:16 Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Friday 10 May 2013 09:41:52 David Baron wrote:
So far, runs nicely except it is always asking for account passwords, no
option to remember.
I'm not sure it's the same, but ever since the upgrade to 4.10/KMail2
KWallet asks for my
Always'
button ...
I think KMail2 is using a different acount resource so is being treated
differently by kwallet.
Since the migration to KMail2 didn't work too well for me (and I'm mostly
using dIMAP), I deleted and recreated my dIMAP accounts.
Try looking in system settings Account
I have the new kmail up and running.
First questions:
How do I import my old filters?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1548424.bU71AqIUUn@dovidhalevi
On Thursday 09 May 2013 19:00:38 David Baron wrote:
I have the new kmail up and running.
First questions:
How do I import my old filters?
Have you exported them before?
If so you can reimport them via Settings - Configure filters and there Import -
Kmail filters.
Best regards,
Josep
--
Hi Debian Qt/KDE team!
Please make sure that when you package KMail 2 the fix for
Bug 288792 - data loss: kmail2 must not use existing [Folder-xy] settings
on random new folders
https://bugs.kde.org/288792
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-pimm=132368796708381w=2
is included.
Officially the fix
Why not, but as fas as I am aware, kmail2 is not (yet) packaged in Debian
and even then, a path for transition is needed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
50 matches
Mail list logo
