Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 419033 linux-image-2.6.21-1-prep
Bug#419033: linux-image-2.6.20-1-prep: fails to configure - mkprep location is
wrong
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.20-1-prep' to
`linux-image-2.6.21-1-prep'.
retitle 419033
Hi folks
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
Fixes:
- alpha isa interface
- powerpc mkvmlinuz support (waiting for testbuild)
- sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
Bastian
--
Without freedom of choice there is no creativity.
--
(Resending as I forgot to change the subject. Sorry about that.)
On Friday 18 May 2007 12:18, Bastian Blank wrote:
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
Fixes:
[...]
- sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
This would have a serious implication
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:18:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
Yes, please.
Fixes:
- alpha isa interface
- powerpc mkvmlinuz support (waiting for testbuild)
- sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
Has
[ again wrong ml on cc ]
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 23:54:02 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'd appreciate if you post such questions to the corresponding
development mailing list which is debian-kernel for initramfs
questions.
On Friday 18 May 2007 12:18, Bastian Blank wrote:
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
Fixes:
[...]
- sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
This would have a serious implication for Debian Installer as we'd also
have to drop support for sparc32
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:23:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:18:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
Yes, please.
Fixes:
- alpha isa interface
- powerpc mkvmlinuz support (waiting for
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 01:10:15PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
- sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
For now I only want to disable it.
In that thread there was some opposition to the idea, but I've not seen
anybody making the commitment to maintain sparc32, so dropping it
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:23:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:18:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
- sparc32 deprecation? No fix yet for the cmpxchg problem.
Has there been any input from the sparc porters on this last change? I
agree with Frans that regardless of
On Friday 18 May 2007 14:05, Bastian Blank wrote:
I have to acknowledge the message from Dave[1]. Until there is a new
kernel upstream it may be possible to compile it but it is impossible
to fix real problems.
Yes, I completely agree with that.
However, when you casually propose to
Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.20-3
Severity: important
Starting from 2.6.20, fan control on G5 is broken. I can't locate the
therm_pm72 module
anymore. I've tried to build a kernel by enabling CONFIG_THERM_PM72, but it
seems to be
ignored.
Only 2.6.18-1 works here,
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:18:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
hppa is currently not able to produce any working image. I get random
failures within the dynamic linker while trying to build on. On the
other side we finaly need a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 419033 + pending
Bug#419033: linux-image-2.6.21-1-prep: fails to configure - mkprep location is
wrong
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 02:39:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 14:05, Bastian Blank wrote:
I have to acknowledge the message from Dave[1]. Until there is a new
kernel upstream it may be possible to compile it but it is impossible
to fix real problems.
Yes, I completely
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 424997 linux-2.6
Bug#424997: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver: Not working with non PAE
hypervisor package
Warning: Unknown package 'xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver'
Bug reassigned from package
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver
Severity: normal
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver-686
State: not installed
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2
Priority: extra
Section: admin
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Uncompressed Size: 53.2k
Depends:
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 16:52:21 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424997: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver: Not working
with non PAE hypervisor package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:18:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
I'll disable sparc32 and all hppa images.
- sparc32: see the other discussion.
- hppa: broken toolchain which makes it impossible to build them and we
need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 425050 wontfix
Bug#425050: initramfs-tools: Ask if we should update all initramfses
Tags were: patch
Tags added: wontfix
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 425050 wontfix
stop
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:32:45PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) wrote:
I created a patch to ask a debconf question (medium priority) if
update-initramfs should update all initramfs or not. The idea is that
other packages (like my uswsusp package) should check this
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:32:45PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) wrote:
I created a patch to ask a debconf question (medium priority) if
update-initramfs should update all initramfs or not. The idea is that
other packages (like my uswsusp package) should check this question too.
This way
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:48:54 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 425050 wontfix
stop
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:32:45PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) wrote:
I created a patch to ask a debconf question (medium priority) if
update-initramfs should update all initramfs
Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-k7
Version: 2.6.20-3
Severity: important
The 2.6.20-1 package appears to behave as though image_in_boot was set:
[fbriere] toroia:~ $ ls -l /vmlinuz /initrd.img /boot/vmlinuz /boot/initrd.img
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2007-05-18 14:57 /boot/initrd.img -
Sorry for directly sending an email. I can't get the machine running
well enough to actually send a bug report.
I have a bit of a hybrid machine, with some new hardware in it. I have
a DVD attached to IDE, a 250 GB SATA drive attached to SATA1 (boot
device) and a 3Ware card with 4 IDE disks
hello michael,
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:25:41PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi Maks,
I guess you followed the discussion on the d-d mailing list about this
issue. Imho it actually makes sense, to have a consistent
update-initramfs-behaviour between all packages modifying the initramfs.
maximilian attems wrote:
hello michael,
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:25:41PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi Maks,
I guess you followed the discussion on the d-d mailing list about this
issue. Imho it actually makes sense, to have a consistent
update-initramfs-behaviour between all packages
linux-2.6_2.6.21-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.21-2.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.21-2.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.21_2.6.21-2_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.21_2.6.21-2_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.21_2.6.21-2_all.deb
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.21-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.21-2.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.21-2.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.21-2.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.21_2.6.21-2_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.21_2.6.21-2_all.deb
Your message dated Fri, 18 May 2007 20:47:31 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#419033: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.21-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
tags 425050 - wontfix
Bug#425050: initramfs-tools: Ask if we should update all initramfses
Tags were: wontfix patch
Tags removed: wontfix
End of message, stopping processing here.
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.21-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.21-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.21.orig.tar.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.21-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6.21_2.6.21-1_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
adding info about an irc discussion.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:11:37PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Well, this is the point. We don't have a consistent policy. Every
package does it's own, which for the given reasons is not a good
solution. If you have a better solution than the given one,
(new) linux-kbuild-2.6.21_2.6.21-1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.21
This package provides the kbuild infrastructure for the headers packages
for Linux kernel version 2.6.21.
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.21-1.diff.gz
to
Package: linux-source-2.6.21
Version: 2.6.21-1
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Building the kernel on a powerpc machine leads to a semi-usable kernel
because the macintosh specific modules are not built (e.g. pmu).
According to this message on the debian
\On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:18:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I'd like to schedule the linux-2.6 2.6.21-[23] upload for today.
I'll disable sparc32 and all hppa images.
- sparc32: see the other discussion.
Ok, this seems to
Hi,
just to add one more data point: I run into the same issue (well,
2.6.20 had other problems, so I turned to
http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~tobiasnadler/linux/kernelcompile.html for
some help with 2.6.21), but: adding a delay is sooo bad solution, it
even has serious support (see rootdelay in man
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 412740 + pending
Bug#412740: linux-image-2.6-sparc64: please include config USB_SERIAL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:14 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 01:44 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Ludovic Rousseau said:
Le 10.05.2007, à 00:25:32, Stephen Gran a écrit:
I have always just asked them on IRC on #debian-kernel.
Have you
Doing a lspci -vnn, I see that 00:12.0 is described as a SATA
Controller. There is nothing in the lspci stanza about this device
which indicates that it is a JMicron 360, which is what the manual says
it is.
If I look through the 2.6.20-1-k7 kernel config, the option
CONFIG_PATA_JMICRON is
39 matches
Mail list logo
