On Tue, 31 May 2022 10:41:05 +0200 Diederik de Haas
wrote:
> In https://bugs.debian.org/970639 the request was made to enable ZSWAP.
>
> Upon it was (rightly) noted that zswap.rst contained this:
> > Zswap is a new feature as of v3.11 and interacts heavily with memory
> > reclaim. This
.
urgh, not that way. Let's do it properly:
From: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Subject: page-writebackc-subtract-min_free_kbytes-from-dirtyable-memory-fix
fix up min_free_kbytes extern declarations
Cc: Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au
Cc: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Cc: Wu Fengguang
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:07:34 +1100
paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Ensure MAX_PAUSE is 4 or larger, so limits in
return clamp_val(t, 4, MAX_PAUSE);
(the only use of it) are not back-to-front.
MAX_PAUSE is not used in this fashion in current kernels.
(This patch does not solve the PAE
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:46:15 +1100 paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
... I don't believe 64GB of RAM has _ever_ been booted on a 32-bit
kernel without either violating the ABI (3GB/1GB split) or doing
something that never got merged upstream ...
Sorry to be so contradictory:
psz@como:~$
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:51:35 +1100
paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Dear Andrew,
Check /proc/slabinfo, see if all your lowmem got eaten up by buffer_heads.
Please see below: I do not know what any of that means. This machine has
been running just fine, with all my users logging in here
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:44:36 +
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Some people run general-purpose distribution kernels on netbooks with
a card that is physically non-removable or logically non-removable
(e.g. used for /home) and cannot be cleanly unmounted during suspend.
Add a
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:11:27 +0100 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
As found in http://bugs.debian.org/550010, hfsplus is using type u32
rather than sector_t for some sector number calculations.
In particular, hfsplus_get_block() does:
u32 ablock, dblock, mask;
...
On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:05:31 +0200 maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
without it currently perl 5.10 doesn't build on alpha:
perl.c: In function 'perl_construct':
perl.c:388: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in this function)
-
(cc's restored. Please don't do that)
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 23:30:35 + Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 14:49 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:03:02 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8028
Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:09:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I don't know what to suggest, really. I don't think that adding complexity
to MM to support rare and broken hardware is likely to be welcome.
Like I said, it's hardly rare hardware
Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:38:11AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
We already have infrastructure for managing and allocating large
physically-contiguous hunks of memory: arch/*/mm/hugetlb.c. On x86 that
operates in 2MB hunks (non-PAE) and 4MB
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c: vt_ioctl(): line 377
/*
* To have permissions to do most of the vt ioctls, we either
* have
* to be the owner of the tty, or have CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG.
*/
perm = 0;
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis, you, or somebody should create a new patch series with just the
critical fixes, NO WHITESPACE/FORMATTING CHANGES mixed in, and send
those first.
Whitespace changes are often nice, but they should be the very first
patch[es] in the series. You
13 matches
Mail list logo
