Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 23:29:57 +0200
with message-id <20090511212957.ga31...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: various modules cannot be 
loaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #435134,
regarding linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: various modules cannot be loaded
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
435134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp
Version: 2.6.22-2
Severity: normal

The kernel boots, but various kernel modules cannot be loaded.  Notables:

module xfs: Relocation (type 17) overflow vs per_cpu__xfsstats
module ipv6: Relocation (type 17) overflow vs section 32

Peter

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-rc7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp depends on:
ii  coreutils                     5.97-5.3   The GNU core utilities
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.11     Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.85g      tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools             3.3-pre4-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: 
true
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: true
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: 
true
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: 
true
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: 
true
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: 
false
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: 
true
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/initrd-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: false
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/abort-install-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp:
 true
  
linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: 
true
  linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: true


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.26-1

On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:41:32PM -0700, Gabriele Gorla wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-alpha-smp
> Followup-For: Bug #435134
> 
> I have not noticed any module loading issues with current lenny
> kernels (either generic or smp).
> 
> In particular xfs and ipv6 load just fine.

Thanks, marking as closed.

Cheers,
        Moritz


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to