On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:59:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:50:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Anthony, ...
I would like to hear your comment on the possibility to override the need
for
NEW for the creation of some new binary package [...]
Sven, you bring
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Other issues:
* NEW
Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6
stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the ftpmasters will
Hi all
if any debian developer is there then please advocate my application i am wating for an advovate.
email id :- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Name :- Deepak Tripathi
Thanks
On 6/1/06, Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: So if -15 is
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:57:08AM +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
Hi all
if any debian developer is there then please advocate my application i am
wating for an advovate.
email id :- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Name :- Deepak Tripathi
Well, it would help if you spoke a bit more about yourself, and
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:15:42AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:59:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:50:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Anthony, ...
I would like to hear your comment on the possibility to override the need
for
NEW
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
mdadm 2.5-1 is ready to take over initramfs configuration for RAID
systems. It currently conflicts with initramfs-tools (= 0.60)
because it changes the name of the scripts/local-top file from md to
mdadm, but lvm depends on 'md'.
nack, use an
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:27:40AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:15:42AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:59:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:50:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Anthony, ...
I would like to hear
also sprach maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.01.1003 +0200]:
mdadm 2.5-1 is ready to take over initramfs configuration for RAID
systems. It currently conflicts with initramfs-tools (= 0.60)
because it changes the name of the scripts/local-top file from md to
mdadm, but lvm
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-8
Recently I upgraded four of my machines to etch; three of them are ok,
but one doesn't boot with new kernel 2.6.15.
Boot process stops at waiting for root filesystem, long pause and
no /dev/hda1 message; after this, I receive a busybox shell.
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:39:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.01.1003 +0200]:
mdadm 2.5-1 is ready to take over initramfs configuration for RAID
systems. It currently conflicts with initramfs-tools (= 0.60)
because it changes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 314707 normal
Bug#314707: ide0=ata66 -- OBSOLETE OPTION, WILL BE REMOVED SOON!
Severity set to `normal' from `minor'
retitle 314707 UDMA3/4/5 not working with Centrino Chipset, 82801DBM (ICH4-M)
IDE Controller (rev 03)
Bug#314707:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:56:37AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
No, I complained about the kernel team's practice of *coupling* critical
fixes with irrelevant changes that require NEW processing, just as I would
Bastian said :
-15 will again hit NEW.
And you asked :
And if there are
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:57:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Nobody asked me. I have no idea why you're presenting this in the context
of my objection to the coupling of release-critical fixes to
release-irrelevant changes, since that's clearly not the case here, so
clearly isn't what I'm
Hi.
I'm suffering this bug from some time ago.
udev 0.091-2
uname -a
Linux marieta 2.6.15-1-k7 #2 Mon Mar 6 15:42:39 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
lspci -nvv -s 00:09.0
:00:09.0 0200: 1282:9102 (rev 31)
Subsystem: 3030:5032
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV-
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:04:11AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
latest initramfs-tools mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
for better consistency. (package on mentors not yet in unstable)
Just a plain NACK. It moves files around which
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
latest initramfs-tools mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
for better consistency. (package on mentors not yet in unstable)
d-i uses in base-installer as confdir /target/etc/mkinitramfs/
in postinst. how should the
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:15:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Maybe, or maybe not, but you cannot deny that the actual NEW situation is
satisfactory.
Heh.
And actually, what i intented to say was that there where three points which
made me consider this a good time to post, not a proposal,
17 matches
Mail list logo
