Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > 6.7.9-2 in unstable does not exibit the issue. Besides some reverts, the key fix seems to be 321da3dc1f3c92a12e3c5da934090d2992a8814c in master (v6.8-rc6~14^2~5), which was backported as d97e1c3602240bd35c48ef9aa978e0c47a511d03 (v6.7.7~167), so that seems

Processed: Re: Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240410193207.qnb75osxuk4ov...@mraw.org/ Bug #1068675 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Control: forwarded -1 https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240410193207.qnb75osxuk4ov...@mraw.org/ Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > Yes, if you prefer to not do the forwarding upstream (stable list, CC > to involved people + regression list), then I can try to take care of > it. Obviously the

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Control: tags -1 + upstream Hi, On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 07:00:14PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > > Intermediate results based on upstream stable releases: v6.1.80 is good, > > v6.1.81 is bad. Still ~200 commits to bisect. > > Final results: > >

Processed: Re: Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + upstream Bug #1068675 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Added tag(s) upstream. -- 1068675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068675 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > Of course, since there are companion changes afterwards, it cannot be > simply reverted on top of either v6.1.82 (Debian) or v6.1.84 (upstream). > > > I'd appreciate if someone could carry the ball through the appropriate > channels upstream. And of course I

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > Intermediate results based on upstream stable releases: v6.1.80 is good, > v6.1.81 is bad. Still ~200 commits to bisect. Final results: kibi@genova:~/hack/linux.git ((cf33e6ca12d81...)|BISECTING)$ git bisect bad cf33e6ca12d814e1be2263cb76960d0019d7fb94 is

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > v6.1.84 with stable's .config & bindeb-pkg still does; next up for me: > confirming good/bad and bisecting. Intermediate results based on upstream stable releases: v6.1.80 is good, v6.1.81 is bad. Still ~200 commits to bisect. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

On Wednesday, 10 April 2024 15:32:02 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > > Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:33:09PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > > Does the problem go away if you revert the following commits on top of > > > >

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > 6.7.9-2 in unstable does not exibit the issue. v6.1.84 with stable's .config & bindeb-pkg still does; next up for me: confirming good/bad and bisecting. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager --

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:42:44PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > hi Cyril, > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:32:02PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > > > Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > > >

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: tags -1 + confirmed hi Cyril, On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:32:02PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > > Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:33:09PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > > Does the

Processed: Re: Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #1068675 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #1068675 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information:

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-10): > Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:33:09PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > Does the problem go away if you revert the following commits on top of > > > -19? > > > > > > db6338f45971b4285ea368432a84033690eaf53c > > > scsi:

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Hi Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-04-10): > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:33:09PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > Hi Cyril, > > > > On Tuesday, 9 April 2024 01:06:43 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Upgrading from linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64 to linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64 > > > leads to

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Cyril, On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:33:09PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Hi Cyril, > > On Tuesday, 9 April 2024 01:06:43 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Upgrading from linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64 to linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64 > > leads to losing some SMART

Processed: Re: Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #1068675 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1068675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068675 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Hi Cyril, On Tuesday, 9 April 2024 01:06:43 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Upgrading from linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64 to linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64 > leads to losing some SMART information, at least as queried by munin (in > Debian 12) when it comes to sensors. Does the problem go away if you

Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2)

Package: src:linux Version: 6.1.82-1 Severity: normal Hi, Upgrading from linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64 to linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64 leads to losing some SMART information, at least as queried by munin (in Debian 12) when it comes to sensors. I'm getting the following results on the 2 pairs of