(for dle readers: this package apparently violates many devref
recommendations, particularly about debconf notes abuse. This is
indeed a quite specific case, as the qmail package is used to generate
qmail-srcmany discussions already happened with the current
maintainer about this. So, we'll
Christian PERRIER wrote:
(for dle readers: this package apparently violates many devref
recommendations, particularly about debconf notes abuse. This is
indeed a quite specific case, as the qmail package is used to generate
qmail-srcmany discussions already happened with the current
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for
the qmail source package.
Here's a review of the control file (in annotated diff form). As I
mentioned, there's also a control.real with further problems, but
that can wait.
---
Thank you for working on this Christian.
I like the changes, and I approve all of them without exception. Please let me
know how you would like me to proceed. Shall I wait for your bug report to
file a new package, or shall I do that now?
Cheers!
Jon
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:13 PM,
Quoting Jon Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
Thank you for working on this Christian.
I like the changes, and I approve all of them without exception. Please let
me know how you would like me to proceed. Shall I wait for your bug report
to file a new package, or shall I do that now?
Better
No problem. I will be happy to wait.
I didn't see any emails from Justin. Did he perhaps send it to just the list?
If the package descriptions need an update, please let me know when you file
the bug.
I believe I have removed most of the illegal notes. If I need to remove any
more, please
Jon Marler wrote:
I didn't see any emails from Justin. Did he perhaps send it to
just the list? If the package descriptions need an update, please
let me know when you file the bug.
Sorry, I was Ccing qm...@packages.debian.org, but it didn't occur to
me to include you directly.
7 matches
Mail list logo
