The last primary doubles as the home for the extended
partitions. If you use up all the primaries (four, I
think), you can't define any extended. You often see
systems with hda1, hda5, hda6... because of this.
Thanks, Micros~1/IBM.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:26:17AM +0100, mi wrote:
I can't
A ps to this topic:
(It was a dell inspiron 5000, BIOS A08, bootloader grub.
The Question was why creating the hibernation partition as physically
(outer) first of all did damage the bootloader, when performing
BIOS-hibernation.)
I read the grub manual (partly ;-), and found a hint.
I
The last primary doubles as the home for the extended
partitions. If you use up all the primaries (four, I
think), you can't define any extended. You often see
systems with hda1, hda5, hda6... because of this.
Thanks, Micros~1/IBM.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:26:17AM +0100, mi wrote:
I can't
A ps to this topic:
(It was a dell inspiron 5000, BIOS A08, bootloader grub.
The Question was why creating the hibernation partition as physically
(outer) first of all did damage the bootloader, when performing
BIOS-hibernation.)
I read the grub manual (partly ;-), and found a hint.
I
Thank you very much, Frédérick and Benjamin. I knew about swsusp, but
hadn't check the project status in a long while. Could you say, more or
less, how fast is it? I mean average suspend/resume times on your
machines.
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 15:33, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
The official page for
Thank you very much, Frédérick and Benjamin. I knew about swsusp, but
hadn't check the project status in a long while. Could you say, more or
less, how fast is it? I mean average suspend/resume times on your
machines.
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 15:33, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
The official page for
Hi Nils Anders, Ceasr and whoever's interested !
Here's the stuff:
Dell I5000 PIII 600 Mhz
Phoenix BIOS 4.0 Release 6.0, Dell-Update revA08
BIOS APM suspend set to 'disk'
12 GB FUJITSU MHK21DAT
Though dma enabled, it's far not as fast as my deskbox seagate.
( but does BIOS hib use dma here ? )
Hello again.
Here are some additions about APM.
Linux apm - functions seem (correctly) not to depend on the BIOS setting,
e.g. if BIOS hibernation is 'disabled' the linux apm does still relesase it.
apm -s puts the machine into suspend-to-Ram; FN-suspend also.
apm -S puts the machine into real
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 00:50, mi wrote:
Hi Nils Anders, Ceasr and whoever's interested !
Thanks a lot for the information. It is pretty much what I expected. I
think I won't bother with hibernation yet --not with BIOS hibernation
anyway. If my machine behaves as yours, I can reboot faster than
* Cesar Rincon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-13 14:19] :
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 00:50, mi wrote:
Hi Nils Anders, Ceasr and whoever's interested !
[...]
I'm almost sure that W2K implements hibernation in its kernel, bypassing
the BIOS. There is a project for doing the same on Linux:
The swsusp Patch works perfectly in my homemade 2.4.20 and 2.4.19 for almost a
year now.
it is already included in the 2.5 tree.
in my case it even suspends pcmcia cards flawlessly if you don't change them
while the computer is suspended.
don't know why there aren't more people using it.
check
Hi Nils Anders, Ceasr and whoever's interested !
Here's the stuff:
Dell I5000 PIII 600 Mhz
Phoenix BIOS 4.0 Release 6.0, Dell-Update revA08
BIOS APM suspend set to 'disk'
12 GB FUJITSU MHK21DAT
Though dma enabled, it's far not as fast as my deskbox seagate.
( but does BIOS hib use dma here ? )
Hello again.
Here are some additions about APM.
Linux apm - functions seem (correctly) not to depend on the BIOS setting,
e.g. if BIOS hibernation is 'disabled' the linux apm does still relesase it.
apm -s puts the machine into suspend-to-Ram; FN-suspend also.
apm -S puts the machine into real
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 00:50, mi wrote:
Hi Nils Anders, Ceasr and whoever's interested !
Thanks a lot for the information. It is pretty much what I expected. I
think I won't bother with hibernation yet --not with BIOS hibernation
anyway. If my machine behaves as yours, I can reboot faster than
* Cesar Rincon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-13 14:19] :
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 00:50, mi wrote:
Hi Nils Anders, Ceasr and whoever's interested !
[...]
I'm almost sure that W2K implements hibernation in its kernel, bypassing
the BIOS. There is a project for doing the same on Linux:
The swsusp Patch works perfectly in my homemade 2.4.20 and 2.4.19 for almost a
year now.
it is already included in the 2.5 tree.
in my case it even suspends pcmcia cards flawlessly if you don't change them
while the computer is suspended.
don't know why there aren't more people using it.
check
I can't believe it... it works !
:)))
I went into cfdisk and cut the hibernation part hda1 into 2 pieces.
That is, deleted it and put a 541 MB new hibernation at the end of the free
space. Plus one little one (7 MB) in the beginning.
Which is unfortunateley unusable now - i seem to have used up
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 10:26, mi wrote:
I can't believe it... it works !
:)))
I went into cfdisk and cut the hibernation part hda1 into 2 pieces.
That is, deleted it and put a 541 MB new hibernation at the end of the free
space. Plus one little one (7 MB) in the beginning.
Which is
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 05:46, Nils-Anders Duesund Nøttseter wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 10:26, mi wrote:
I can't believe it... it works !
...
Would you mind posting a more detailed list of how you made it work?
Also which laptop you have? I have tried for ages and I am still looking
for
I can't believe it... it works !
:)))
I went into cfdisk and cut the hibernation part hda1 into 2 pieces.
That is, deleted it and put a 541 MB new hibernation at the end of the free
space. Plus one little one (7 MB) in the beginning.
Which is unfortunateley unusable now - i seem to have used up
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 10:26, mi wrote:
I can't believe it... it works !
:)))
I went into cfdisk and cut the hibernation part hda1 into 2 pieces.
That is, deleted it and put a 541 MB new hibernation at the end of the free
space. Plus one little one (7 MB) in the beginning.
Which is
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 05:46, Nils-Anders Duesund Nøttseter wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 10:26, mi wrote:
I can't believe it... it works !
...
Would you mind posting a more detailed list of how you made it work?
Also which laptop you have? I have tried for ages and I am still looking
for
22 matches
Mail list logo
