[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kragen Sitaker) writes:
So simply because the copyright on a piece of software is licensed
under the IPL does not mean that the patents in it are licensed in
DFSG-compliant ways; it seems to me that the patents could be licensed
(by IBM) in ways that violate section 3 of
[Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed.]
This is the new Postfix license. Is it GPL-compatible?
--
ciao,
Marco
---BeginMessage---
And here it is. Reactions are welcome, before we apply this license
to Postfix/Secure Mailer.
Wietse
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my reading, the DFSG does not concern itself with hypothetical
patent licenses. No declaration from a free software author can
guarantee that there'll never be patent problems, so if the DFSG
were to require such guarantee Debian would suddenly fit
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed.]
This is the new Postfix license. Is it GPL-compatible?
I don't think so.
A Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code form
under its own license agreement, provided that:
a) it complies
4 matches
Mail list logo
