Hi,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:23:25AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
(Did you forget to send to the mailing list? Feel free to quote
me in public.)
done.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:59:54PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:16:50PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:16:50PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:59:50PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
[obnoxious clause]
We've discussed it on this list already, but the remaining open question
is, what patents do they have that they refer to here?
If ECC is
Scripsit Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh - I see what you mean, but shipping this code poses many people
at risk of inadvertantly infringing on a patent if there is one in
the first place, because many people would just use the code in good
faith that the Open on the packkage label and the
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 18:38, J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote:
Auke Jilderda wrote:
1. Free Software is geared towards idealism whereas Open Source aims
for pragmatism. In my opinion, both are essential to making this the
succes it is. (Personally, I tend a bit more towards Open Source
Dear Debian-legal:
Please pardon my tardiness in replying to this subject (I just read
my DWN), but since I've seen no mention of this particular aspect of
it, here goes:
In a couple of e-mails in the thread[1], Joe Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Sounds like South Africa is about to
Hello,
after I have received a Reject from FTP Masters on the cadaver package,
because it is GPL and linked against openssl, I opened up the Bug #163583 and
contacted upstream.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=163583
Here is the answer from Joe Orton, which basically
Folks good news,
After short exchange of friendly discussion, APSFILTER author decided
to change program to accommodate better DFSG compatibility.
As for the *postcard issue*, he asked me to pass following message:
it was never my intention to punish/sue people for their behavior
for
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 01:24:35AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
after I have received a Reject from FTP Masters on the cadaver package,
because it is GPL and linked against openssl, I opened up the Bug #163583 and
contacted upstream.
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 19:28, Steve Langasek wrote:
So the options are that you could secure a clarification of the GPL's OS
exemption from the FSF, in the form of a new revision of the GPL, that
permits what you're asking; or you can find a way to replace OpenSSL in
the build with a library
9 matches
Mail list logo
