On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:46:15PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Patented software does not have to be patent-encumbered (for example, we
have many programs and libraries in both main and non-US/main that use
CAST5 [0], which is patented). Patent-encumbered software would use
things like LZW,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:47:18PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
If it's electronically (YM digitally?) stored, then I say it's software.
I see no reason to make this word a synonym for computer programs,
and in practice I see people refer to a large variety of digitally
stored data as
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 11:45:39AM +0200, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:46:15PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Patented software does not have to be patent-encumbered (for example, we
have many programs and libraries in both main and non-US/main that use
CAST5 [0], which is
Drew Scott Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the an implied copyright notification (I.e. code added by person)
sufficient in the debian/copyright or is it necessary to say
explicitly say year copyright person?
There is no such thing as implied copyright.
But that doesn't really help
Barak Pearlmutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With a little help, I've composed a draft DFSG FAQ. It meant as an
introduction to issues discussed on debian-legal, with some general
background material to help bring naive readers up from ground zero.
I like it. I would suggest:
* In the
5 matches
Mail list logo
