On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
However, clause 3(b) worries me a bit:
b. If modifications to the SE are released under this
license, a non-exclusive right is granted to the holder of the
copyright of the unmodified SE to distribute your
modification in
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
b. If modifications to the SE are released under this
license, a non-exclusive right is granted to the holder of the
copyright of the unmodified SE to distribute your
modification in future versions of the SE provided such
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Dylan Thurston wrote:
On 2003-10-08, Fedor Zuev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this case, it is very unlikely that TYPEBANK Co. will win
a lawsuit in any country. After all, similarity is not implies
derivative work. But it is very likely that they will threaten,
harass
I am up to speed on the recent discussion of the GFDL, and I have read
the various position statements published by members of the Debian
community. Here is my situation:
1. I have a book, http://diveintopython.org/, which is currently
licensed under the GFDL, with no Invariant Sections and
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:24:23PM -0400, Mark Pilgrim wrote:
I am up to speed on the recent discussion of the GFDL, and I have read
the various position statements published by members of the Debian
community. Here is my situation:
1. I have a book, http://diveintopython.org/, which is
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:05:56AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I personally consider that non-DFSG-free, under the theory that in
general, your modifications have pecuniary value, and you are
compelled to license your valuable modifications to the
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 05:00:16PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
I would recommend the GNU General Public License, version 2. This
accomplishes your goals, and it is unequivocally free.
I have equivocated on its freeness before, with respect to clauses 2a)
and 2c).
Also, I see no reason the
Hi,
i just noticed that in
amavisd-new: /etc/ldap/schema/amavis.schema
# Copyright (c) 2003 Jacques Supcik, Swisscom Enterprise Solutions Ltd.
# Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
# under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
# or any
On 2003-10-11 17:24:23 +0100 Mark Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. Give away my book for free.
I don't think any free software licence will prevent that.
2. Force translations and all derivative works to remain free.
3. Force my editor's contributions to remain free.
This means that
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 16:29, Mathieu Roy wrote:
I'd think so. Certainly the copyright is valid, and people can and do
release,
Why is it certain?
The Berne convention says so, that'd be why the copyright is valid. And
if it isn't valid, then its in the public domain.
A book under
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 08:17, Richard Braakman wrote:
You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and
you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee.
You can presumably put whatever conditions you like on that warranty
protection, and on whatever
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 19:35, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I'd say This SLA only applies to the software provided by us. If you
modify any of the supplied software in any way, or add extra software to the
system(s) covered by this warranty, this SLA is null and void and there are
no warranties about
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:18:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 05:00:16PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
I would recommend the GNU General Public License, version 2. This
accomplishes your goals, and it is unequivocally free.
I have equivocated on its freeness
13 matches
Mail list logo
