Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?

2004-02-29 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:09:15PM -0500, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote: I'd like to package an html manual for the package I'm preparing. However, it's covered by the Open Publication License v 1.0. http://opencontent.org/openpub/ Is it DFSG-free? I checked the

Re: Debian Legal summary of the Petris license

2004-02-29 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Hi Simon Thanks a lot for that. I will discuss with the upstream author. Best regards Andree On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 23:08, Simon Law wrote: Debian Legal summary of the Petris license The original license is available at http://home1.stofanet.dk/peter-seidler/petris-0.7.tar.gz and is

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?

2004-02-29 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:09:15PM -0500, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote: http://opencontent.org/openpub/ Is it DFSG-free? It is free under the same conditions (no optional clauses). Huh? Do you not even try to address the arguments that it is

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?

2004-02-29 Thread Josh Triplett
Henning Makholm wrote: | Any publication in standard (paper) book form shall require the | citation of the original publisher and author. The publisher and | author's names shall appear on all outer surfaces of the book. On | all outer surfaces of the book the original publisher's name shall

Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License

2004-02-29 Thread Ben Reser
First of all I've been behind on other email as I've been kept busy with various other things lately. But I think this summary is inaccurate and premature. On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:11:07AM -0500, Simon Law wrote: Clause 3 is a complex statement, which appears to be derived from the obsolete

Re: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?

2004-02-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:21:11PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: | Any publication in standard (paper) book form shall require the | citation of the original publisher and author. The publisher and | author's names shall appear on all outer surfaces of the book. On | all outer surfaces of the

Re: XFree86 is changing their license

2004-02-29 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 10:27:26AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Ok, another (and probably last) followup on the licence problem. The XFree86 project has released a FAQ accompanying the licence at : http://www.xfree86.org/legal/licenses.html The important points being : o The licence

Re: license for Federal Information Processing Standards

2004-02-29 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:58:29AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:12:28PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote: As mentioned in my previous mail, I am creating a package for hashcash. The source for the package includes a document, fip180-1.txt, which is a copy of the

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-02-29 Thread Miles Bader
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, for example Debian Iceweasel -- Based on the Mozilla Firefox code is a perfectly legit usage of a trademark. Oh, `Debian Iceweasel'... I kinda like that ... -Miles -- Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,