Dne čt 24. listopadu 2005 13:58 Václav Jůza napsal(a):
making private changes,
In my original proposal it would be marked by no-source,
Sorry for mistake, in the original proposal it would be marked
by ::nonfree-source.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (quoting me without attribution)
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2005-November/001029.html
This is better, but misses quite a few common cases. OTTOMH, there are
also restrictions on distributing adapted versions,
I think this could be marked by
2005-11-24 15:20 MJ Ray wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (quoting me without attribution)
Sorry, because I was not really in CC and the response through debtags-devel
was delayed, I copied the response from web archive and forgot.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2005-November/00
Maybe this subject was discussed before, but I'd like some
clarification. The GNU Ada compiler (GNAT) from FSF is distributed
under GPL with this special linking exception:
As a special exception, if other files instantiate generics from this
unit, or you link this unit with other files to
On 11/24/05, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Andrew Donnellan
On 11/23/05, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In what way? The clause means the license of GNAT is actually LESS
restrictive than the license of GCC (the
Iwould also rethink the use of
e.g. which most closely means 'that is'.
Wrong. 'i.e.' stands for 'id est', which means
'that is'.
'e.g.' is correct for introducing an example.
However, given the number of
people who don't know the difference :-), "for
example" is better.
This specifically implies,
for instance, that unauthorized redistributed modified
works must not [...]
unauthorized makes me think of license violations. That's not what we're
talking about here
Try this:
This specifically implies,
for instance, that redistributed
On Thursday 24 November 2005 20:42, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 11/24/05, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's an example:
This program is licensed under the GPL...etcetc..
If your name is Jim then sections 3a and 3b do not apply.
is LESS restrictive than just the GPL. And it
8 matches
Mail list logo
