Re: Copyright question

2008-02-06 Thread brian m. carlson
[Please follow up to -legal only. Full quote for the benefit of -legal.] On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon wrote: Hi, I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the following statements: -- 1. Redistributions of source code must

Re: Copyright question

2008-02-06 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:46:31PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 16:30 schrieb Jean Parpaillon: Hi, I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the following statements: -- 1. Redistributions of source code must

Re: Copyright question

2008-02-06 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:36:44 +0100 Bas Wijnen wrote: On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:46:31PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 16:30 schrieb Jean Parpaillon: Hi, I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the following statements:

Re: Copyright question

2008-02-06 Thread Ben Finney
brian m. carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [Please follow up to -legal only. Done. On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon wrote: Hi, I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the following statements: -- 1. Redistributions of

backporting licence information for koffice hyphenation

2008-02-06 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
Hello: There is a bug filed about this issue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=410094 Thing is that koffice uses hyphenation dictionaries, and the licence/copyright is stated neither the source tarball nor svn repository[0]. After a conversation with upstream developers,