that feature before.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to personal use only will prevent its inclusion in
Debian. Otherwise, I see no reason why the project would not include it.
Users who use phpGrabComics to copy and redistribute comics may find their
own problems...
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
which
is compatible with our Debian Free Software Guidelines. If your new work is
an original work of authorship[1] and you're the copyright holder then you
can choose to license it under any terms you'd like, including terms which
would make it suitable for inclusion in Debian.
--
Brian Ristuccia
a non-exclusive but otherwise unlimited license to copy, modify, and
distribute the work. The package copyright file needn't mention the
availability of the second license provided the first is adequite to permit
distribution by Debian while also satisfying our Free Software Guidelines.
--
Brian
, this is the place. If you want a professional legal opinion, you
still need to hire a lawyer. :(
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
destroy evidence, and xvidtune to commit arson[1]. We still distribute
those).
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] Components in a certain older DEC monitor can be made to actually catch
fire if the monitor is driven at frequencies outside of its design
range
.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
symbols.
Perhaps these files are the source code, when opened with some proprietary
dsp firmware editor we don't have?
Has anyone asked IBM yet?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not going to help us
distribute it in main, though ...
Actually, the author offered to relicense the problem code under the GPL for
EUR250, which would not be specific to just Debian.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixed upstream.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. 508119/1991
This patent expired a year ago so it shouldn't matter much.
Ehhh, that's wrong. Just an ordinary off-by-10 error I think.
It's not clear that mixmaster actually uses IDEA. Last I checked, it used
3DES for the symmetric crypto.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and thus without infringing on
their copyright.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
those who
may wish to use the software for profit. These restrictions render the
license incompatible with Free Software guideline 6, which prohibits
discrimination against fields of endeavor.
Hope to hear from you soon regarding this matter.
Thanks.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 11:30:16AM +0100, RSAEuro General wrote:
--On 08 August 2002 00:18 -0400 Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Hi, thanks for your mail. We would be interested in working something out
to allow the Internet release of RSAEuro to be included with Debian
that subtle changes might be required to mkae the package conform to
Debian policy, it's likely that this restriction is a non-issue.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp2QjoXdd58Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in non-free or contrib respectively,
provided we're able to distribute it at all without infringing.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:48:08PM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
Make your decision based only on Debian policy. If it's Free Software, it
goes in Main, unless it has crypto - then it goes in non-us/main (at least
until
.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is covered by Computer Modern?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
by statute. So you don't need to
accept the GNU GPL in order to use a copy of the program which you've
bought.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpYNGN4DQl2y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
exists yet or how involved or tedious the process would be.
If you decide to procede further in this area, I suggest you look into
Donald Knuth's books on typeface and typesetting theory.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the GNU GPL and our Debian Free Software Guidelines.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
If somebody can tell me where this package should be ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, then the same thing probably applies.
Maybe those involved should check the dumps for common opcodes and try to
determine the microcontroller type to see if any of this applies. In many
cases, a commented disassembly is as good or better than the original source
code.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED
if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored. - Joseph_Greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
would be extracted
at runtime. In this case, the software could go in contrib. If the user is a
legitimate owner of the card in question, they probably own a copy of the
.vxd file as well and so won't be inconvenienced too badly.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
restrictions on fonts. One thing to keep in
mind, however, was that at the time of this decision fonts were still just
little metal blocks with raised areas intended to mechanically typeset text.
I can dig up details if needed.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
uinder the gpl. But this again may change later, especially if
they loose some of the ideological fears they may have on the GPL.
Why not use libeditline instead? It's source-code compatible with the basic
features of readline and has a BSD (sans ad clause) type license.
--
Brian Ristuccia
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:46:50PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:35:45AM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
Why not use libeditline instead? It's source-code compatible with the basic
features of readline and has a BSD (sans ad clause) type license.
Ok didn't know
the library into your program and distribute the result - if
you don't play by its rules then you have no such right at all and any
copies you make are infringing ones in most jurisdictions).
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. The MPAA has
in the past launched both frivilous and punitive lawsuits, SLAPP's, and
defamation campaigns against people they even mildly don't like. What's up
for debate is whether or not Debian should restrict its activities based on
fear of potential bullying.)
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED
and due dilligence much more narrowly than you
have here. :)
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] | Blessed Be!
@http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
@Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours. Bach
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brian Ristuccia
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:12:34PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:10:30PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
Choice 3 is best. People who live in countries where the use of cryptography
is restricted are probably subject to being arbitrarily jailed or murdered
to provide
crippled crypto-neutered versions of things only validates such sillyness.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the same source, would they be in
non-US or not?
Yes, but only if the source actually contains crypto. Source or binary,
policy currently requires export restricted software to be uploaded to
non-us.
[other stuff omitted]
Good luck :)
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it patched in).
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
were no longer a problem.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you post the entire license on debian-legal? I, at least, don't
know where to get it.
Thanks,
Walter Landry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- End forwarded message -
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
need to invoke a fair use defense because no infringement occured.
Placing the message into the archive(s) is an action implicitly authorized
by the copyright holder when they post their message to an archived public
list.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the release of
Mixmaster 3.0?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:39:14PM -0500, Sam TH wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:26:04PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
that gave him the letters. One can hardly argue that a latter sent to a
public mailing list is unpublished.
Actually, that isn't true. To quote from 17 USC 101
an
expectation of privacy nor a non-disclosure agreement exists on these public
mailing lists.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpatwoBNpU4t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
as it currently stands needs to go in non-us, then that's
where you should put it. Policy that requires packages depending on packages
in non-us also be in non-us will not change even if the current legal
inquiry finds that not all crypto containing uploads need to go to non-us.
--
Brian Ristuccia
in Mozilla and could could be
used instead? I know Mozilla can use plugins intended for Netscape
Communicator 3.x and 4.x, so it's not unlikely that there exist some .h
files defining this interface in that codebase.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A while back, it was stated that mpeg-1 layer 3 encoders couldn't be
packaged. I see that libavifile has a libmp3lame_audioenc that doesn't
appear to invoke an external lame binary. Has Debian's policy on layer 3
encoders changed?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
involved in the Mattel / Cyber Patrol matter
appealed the district court's injunction with the help of the ACLU - and
won. Since then, they have returned the Cyber Patrol list decoder program to
their web sites. One such site is at http://cp.waldo.net/.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Software license.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ssh
Version: 1:2.2.0p1-1.1
Is there any reason why OpenSSH needs to be in non-free now that the RSA
patent has expired? Also, does it even need to be in non-us now that US
crypto regulations have been revised?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 01:31:12PM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
It's not an open source license. Term #6 places limitations on distributing
modified copies.
la CSS, then it would not be OSD-conformant. But if, reductio ad
absurdum
, and it's been done. Look at GNU readline and Rich Salz's editline.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in Mutt.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:30:11AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 03:44:21AM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
This isn't neccessary. It's possible to create two sockets with
socketpair(), and fork(). Then close FD's 0 and 1 in the child and clone one
of the socket FD's onto
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:30:15AM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you want to run a server with SSL, you can always fork() and then exec()
stunnel in the child to relay SSL connections in plaintext to the parent via
a listening port
binaries to be distributed except under very limited
circumstances, we distribute the qmail source only and a patch in non-free.
Note that in order to put the unmodified source in non-free, the copyright
holder must have at least given permission to distribute unmodified copies.
--
Brian Ristuccia
.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpw9QnxZ7qL3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of lego bricks are like glyphs in a fontset.
Even if a fontset is restricted by copyright, documents typeset in that font
are not considered to be derived works of the typeset.
I'll leave the rest for someone else to answer.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
work using only copyright.
What I should send Intel to convince to change the license?
Tell them Debian can't distribute it with their operating system because
their license violates our guidelines. Point them at
http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL
a copyrighted work have the right
to format shift it from a floppy or CD-ROM disc to bits on a hard disk.
(Note, however, that Intel may require people to agree not to use the
software for certain things before giving them a copy).
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web site somewhere? Perhaps the postinst for
your microcode loader could go fetch it.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maildir delivery and doesn't
run tons of stuff as root?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
otherwise violate
copyright law.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 05:00:16AM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
...hmm, wonder if Vorbize can do something like VBR yet...
Vorbize and oggenc write VBR files by default.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: abcde
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
If support for vorbize was added, abcde could move to main.
(I'm assuming it's in contrib because it depends on a non-free mp3 encoder)
I'm gonna be doing some hacking tonight, I'll post a patch to this bug
number if successful.
--
Brian
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Aug 06, 2000
at 03:20:19AM -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 03:20:19AM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
Package: dosemu
Version: 1.0.1-3
These things are annoying. Make it go away.
The Linux DOSEMU
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 09:10:29PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Aug 06, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
If the clickwrap license doesn't go away, dosemu should move to non-free.
[...]
Show me where the DFSG prohibits software from using clickwrap
licenses.
It's a restriction on use rather
mpeg3 decoders as a part of Debian.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 12:27:59PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
Has anything changed about MNGs in last 3 months ???
Support for mng was added to a recent build of mozilla within the past month
or so.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for
a license to decode .gif files when you really don't.
mp3 encoders that employ the methods described in the patents are restricted
in various countries where such patents are permitted. There's probably
other ways to encode mp3's, but nobody has written any such code yet.
--
Brian Ristuccia
sure 5 does but
I'd like it confirmed.
The name change requirement (4) and acknowledgement requirement (5) are both
OK as far as the DFSG are concerned.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to expire
between 1998 and 2018 have been extended by another 20 years. As a result,
only a very tiny number of works will enter the public domain in the US
during the next 20 years.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
provided you meet a few conditions. It appears this is not the case with the
SNNS license, which allows you to distribute modifications as patches only
and makes no mention of an exception for binaries.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
This it would be impossible to publish your own recordings through a record
company without effectively assigning the copyright to that record company.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
are in the public domain.
Industry held copyrights in the US never expire either. Every time our
oldest copyrights near expiration, congress extends the length of copyright
by another few years.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
condition as it may be construed to violate DFSG #5 by discriminating
against people and groups other than Anonymizer, Inc.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in Arms Regulations, of 12-6-84, (Title 22 CFR
121-130), which implements the Arms Export Control Act (22 USC 2728) and may
require license for export. Distributor assumes its own risk for
distribution in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
.
In order to create variations on play, one might need to modify the graphics
and models for that purpose.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or into the body of a program's source code is covered by the GPL and
that this discussion can safely end here. I'm tired of hearing about it.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in countries where copyright is not permitted only by such a
limited exception to otherwise free speech / free press or where copyright
law is still entirely civil.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the software...
Your armenian argument is unfounded. If the later version of the license
further restricts your rights, you can continue to distribute the software
under the ealier version.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- but not required. I think it's a good
recommendation. But you're right - it's not always possible to meet this
term with ease (or at all) and that's why it's best left as a
recommendation, not a requirement.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and I think changing the licenses on the
web pages to one like these sounds pretty good.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 12:09:07PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
While I find licenses with patch clauses odious, they fall within the
limits
of the DFSG.
I think not.
I mean: I think
odious, they fall within the limits
of the DFSG.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
notification clause and other noxious clauses in the regulation lifted. See
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/01/13/1220222
(But I'm sure they might lift it on their own if Debian build servers
started sending them thousands of messages a day! :)
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
as a whole.
Therefore, anyone can use the JRK or JRE and satisy the JDK and JRE license
requirements at the same time.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
impossible. If Majordomo has serious bugs that the license doesn't permit us
to fix, and the upstream authors don't show signs of extreme dilligence in
getting us fixed versions when a bug is found, I'll concur with you and and
SuSE that we remove Majordomo from Debian.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL
.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
should be renamed and reclassified as a free non-us
package.
I think such a change in classification would require a change in Debian
policy. I, for one, endorse such a change. However, I can't speak for all of
Debian.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
release, wasted CD's and other materials, and civil suits by copyright
holders because they failed to listen to the copyright holders when they
complained about the incorrect license in the first place...
I'm sure it'll be fixed soon.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
if neccessary.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 11:31:19AM -0800, Seth David Schoen wrote:
Brian Ristuccia writes:
Wouldn't seizing said machines violate the electronic communication privacy
act or something similar by interefering with email on those machines as
well?
The ECPA doesn't prevent police from
software was not a
derived work of the copyrighted software that it patched and executed, nor
was its publisher responsible for contributory infringement.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 12:50:17PM +0200, Jens Ritter wrote:
Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this has come up before, but it's not truly resolved, so I'll ask
again.
Why is Debian able to distribute software that uses patented LZW and RSA
algorithms from non-free
I know this has come up before, but it's not truly resolved, so I'll ask
again.
Why is Debian able to distribute software that uses patented LZW and RSA
algorithms from non-free, but unable to distribute mp3 encoders in the same
fashion?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
as well.
He's right. Pretend crypto is much worse than no crypto at all.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for commercial distribution
without the prior approval of the author.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:24:40PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Oct 20, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
COPYRIGHT
The DBD::Pg module is free software. You may distribute
under the terms of either the GNU General Public License
or the Artistic License, as specified
with distribution of the binary version.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo