[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still protect source-code redistribution on line.
First, do no harm.
Any such license must, at a minimum, guarantee
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Gregor Richards wrote:
I doubt that it is compliant with the Dissident Problem by your opinions (
plural your), but I think that it's well within line of all of the other
requirements,
I contend that the dissident problem is not the only sticking point;
fundamentally you
O Martes, 21 de Xuño de 2005 ás 20:07:36 -0700, Gregor Richards escribía:
In response section 6:
(So that I can reference, the full section:)
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
original
Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
O Martes, 21 de Xuño de 2005 ás 20:07:36 -0700, Gregor Richards escribía:
In response section 6:
(So that I can reference, the full section:)
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:57:39 -0700, Gregor Richards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
O Martes, 21 de Xuño de 2005 ás 20:07:36 -0700, Gregor Richards escribía:
In response section 6:
(So that I can reference, the full section:)
6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or
Hi Gregor. Let's see if I can understand your motivations, and help
you.
** Gregor Richards ::
In response to An interface to the program, not the program
itself Am I the only person who fails to see this as a
significant difference? I don't think the freedoms of Free
Software should be
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:05:00 -0700, Gregor Richards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still protect source-code redistribution on line. Basically, I'm
Before going too far down this road, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/03/msg00805.html
for some fundamental questions about where to draw the line on this
requirement. Unless you're willing to say all changes must be published,
even if never released, it's gonna be tough to
I've trimmed a bunch of stuff, trying to leave only the real sticking
points. Basically, I believe the task requires restriction of use, not
just distribution, and Debian should never accept it, so you may just want
to ignore me if you think use restrictions are allowed.
Some things your
** Mark Rafn ::
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Gregor Richards wrote:
The term Free Software is open to interpretation, the DFSG is
not the be-all-end-all of what is and isn't Free.
True. This is why I use and support Debian - it's the closest
thing I can find to my personal definition of
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 10:19 -0700, Gregor Richards wrote:
In response to Still unworkable. I want to use the code for some
embedded use ...
How is this unworkable? To support the HTTP protocol to the degree of
sending source code does not require a full HTTP sever per se. Hell,
you could
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:04:27 -0500, Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 10:19 -0700, Gregor Richards wrote:
In response to Still unworkable. I want to use the code for some
embedded use ...
How is this unworkable? To support the HTTP protocol to the degree of
Mark Rafn wrote:
I'd like to encourage you to think less along the lines it's
currently a web server, so the license should cater to that case and
more like people should be able to make things out of this that I
haven't thought of, using methodologies yet undreamt. This can't
happen if
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:36:50 -0700, Gregor Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Mark Rafn wrote:
I'd like to encourage you to think less along the lines it's
currently a web server, so the license should cater to that case and
more like people should be able to make things out of this that
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still protect source-code redistribution on line. Basically, I'm
trying to write a special exception to the GNU GPL that would add this
without some
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 19:05 -0700, Gregor Richards wrote:
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still protect source-code redistribution on line. Basically, I'm
trying to write a
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:52:55 +, Brian M. Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 19:05 -0700, Gregor Richards wrote:
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still
17 matches
Mail list logo
