On [03/12/02 17:12], Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
So Michael (and neither I ;-) wouldn't mind changing the current
license text to something else to keep the code in public domain.
*Software in the public domain does not require a
On [03/12/02 4:29], Brian M. Carlson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
according to my ITP on debian-devel and in the BTS, I'm going to package
tinycdb. First the current license for this package:
|This package is written by Michael Tokarev, based on
On [02/12/02 21:14], Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
according to my ITP on debian-devel and in the BTS, I'm going to package
tinycdb. First the current license for this package:
|This package is written by Michael Tokarev, based on
Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|You can do whatever you like with this package. The code is placed
|at the public domain.
Public domain is free. One manpage calls it something like the only
true free.
Indeed.
|This package is distributed in a hope it will be useful, but
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
|You can do whatever you like with this package. The code is placed
|at the public domain.
Placing in the public domain is not a valid concept in all
jurisdictions. It's not always possible to abandon copyright.
It's probably
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
|You can do whatever you like with this package. The code is placed
|at the public domain.
Placing in the public domain is not a valid concept in all
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:50:09AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
|You can do whatever you like with this package. The code is placed
|at the public domain.
On [03/12/02 16:07], Richard Braakman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
|You can do whatever you like with this package. The code is placed
|at the public domain.
Placing in the public domain is not a valid concept in all
jurisdictions. It's not
On [03/12/02 10:52], Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:56:57AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
Although technically not a license, I believe the above statement is
sufficient to place the code in question in the public domain. This
means that there is no longer a copyright
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
So Michael (and neither I ;-) wouldn't mind changing the current
license text to something else to keep the code in public domain.
*Software in the public domain does not require a license*.
So would having a copyright file
[I'm not subscribed to debian-legal, so if there are any issues with the
license, then please send me a copy of the e-Mail. I'm goint to set the
Mail-Followup-To header accordingly.]
Hi,
according to my ITP on debian-devel and in the BTS, I'm going to package
tinycdb. First the current license
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
according to my ITP on debian-devel and in the BTS, I'm going to package
tinycdb. First the current license for this package:
|This package is written by Michael Tokarev, based on ideas and API
|found in cdb-0.75 package
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
according to my ITP on debian-devel and in the BTS, I'm going to package
tinycdb. First the current license for this package:
|This package is written by Michael Tokarev, based on ideas and API
|found in cdb-0.75 package by
13 matches
Mail list logo
