Re: Artwork License for package in main

2014-01-01 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Dimitry Polivaev dijo [Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 02:05:06AM +0100]: Copyright != Licensing != Trademark usage Thank you very much. I want to prove my understanding: if we just declare and use some picture as our logo it identifies the project even if the picture is licensed as e.g. CC3+ by-sa

Re: Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-31 Thread Dimitry Polivaev
Hello, I still have one related question. Could you please explain how we can protect Freeplane logo displayed in program splash screen and used in program icons from being misused if all images are distributed under a free license? Thank you very much for your answers! Dimitry Polivaev,

Re: Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-31 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:51:48AM +0100, Dimitry Polivaev wrote: Hello, I still have one related question. Could you please explain how we can protect Freeplane logo displayed in program splash screen and used in program icons from being misused if all images are distributed under a free

Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-31 Thread Florian Weimer
* Dimitry Polivaev: I still have one related question. Could you please explain how we can protect Freeplane logo displayed in program splash screen and used in program icons from being misused if all images are distributed under a free license? What would you consider misuse? If you

Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-31 Thread Dimitry Polivaev
Copyright != Licensing != Trademark usage Thank you very much. I want to prove my understanding: if we just declare and use some picture as our logo it identifies the project even if the picture is licensed as e.g. CC3+ by-sa and can be used by other people for all purposes not related to

Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-30 Thread Felix Natter
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes: hello Paul, -- Which criteria does the license agreement for Freeplane artwork have to meet in order for Freeplane to be allowed in main? The DFSG - http://www.debian.org/social_contract One more question: Is it really true that all of the Debian

Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Felix Natter wrote: One more question: Is it really true that all of the Debian Free Software Guidelines apply not only to code but in the same extent to artwork as well? Yes, they apply to everything in Debian main, executables, libraries, firmware,

Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-30 Thread Florian Weimer
* Felix Natter: upstream of the Freeplane package changed the artwork for the splash screen and the mimetype icon, and the (new) artist wants to keep all rights and only grant the Freeplane project all rights of use. What does this mean exactly? All rights of use could mean all commercial

Re: Artwork License for package in main

2013-12-29 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:17:29PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: As it is, this license agreement is probably not suitable for packages in main [1]. s/probably/definitely/g -- Which criteria does the license agreement for Freeplane artwork have to meet in order for Freeplane to be allowed in