Marco Ghirlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Knoppix should be distributing the source from the same location that
you would get the CD, so its still compliant with the GPL.
Really I couldn't find the sources of Knoppix anywhere.
http://developer.linuxtag.net/knoppix/ looks like a good place to
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scripsit Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marco Ghirlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This I don't understand. Seems like I have to create an ISO with only
the sources.
no. What you can do is add written offer to provide the sources to
whoever ask
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen) wrote:
Marco Ghirlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And that I need the double of the space on the server (that in our
case is hosting us for free, in pure Linux tradition) to put also the
sources.
Hardly. Source is typically much smaller than the
Knoppix should be distributing the source from the same location that
you would get the CD, so its still compliant with the GPL.
Really I couldn't find the sources of Knoppix anywhere.
The fact seems that it is necessary for correct application of the GPL,
but it is not respected so much
Marco Ghirlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knoppix should be distributing the source from the same location that
you would get the CD, so its still compliant with the GPL.
Really I couldn't find the sources of Knoppix anywhere.
Actually, Knoppix provides a written offer good for three
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:36:33PM +, Marco Ghirlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Knoppix should be distributing the source from the same location that
you would get the CD, so its still compliant with the GPL.
Really I couldn't find the sources of Knoppix anywhere.
Scripsit Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marco Ghirlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This I don't understand. Seems like I have to create an ISO with only
the sources.
no. What you can do is add written offer to provide the sources to
whoever ask for them, and, additionnally, point to
[Marco: The primary function of this list is to discuss licenses and
the legal ramifications of those licenses. As none (or almost none) of
us are lawyers, we cannot give legal advice. The following is not
legal advice either.]
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003, Marco Ghirlanda wrote:
The fact is that I would
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Marco: The primary function of this list is to discuss licenses and
the legal ramifications of those licenses. As none (or almost none) of
us are lawyers, we cannot give legal advice. The following is not
legal advice either.]
As far as we know,
First of all thank you!
[Marco: The primary function of this list is to discuss licenses and
the legal ramifications of those licenses. As none (or almost none) of
us are lawyers, we cannot give legal advice. The following is not
legal advice either.]
Sorry for expressing myself in the wrong
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Marco Ghirlanda wrote:
And if I have to distributer the source, then Knoppix itself it
infringing this?
It seems that my next CD is going to be more GPL compliant, anyway.
At least is what I understand from your answers,
Knoppix should be distributing the source from
Hi, I'm Marco Ghirlanda, Linux Advisor at the Virtual Reality and Multi
Media Park of Turin, Italy. (www.vrmmp.it).
We developed for our Open Source Lab (www.opensourcelab.it) a remastered
version of the Knoppix Live Cd, Medialinux, wich includes most ot the
audio, graphic and video software
12 matches
Mail list logo
