Hello,
there are any way to build de image (iso/img) without compression , i don't want
to use filesystem.squashfs,i only want the files.
Thanks to all.
--
Electrònica, Telemàtica, Informàtica i Audiovisuals
a la Politècnica de Mataró.
Typical problem I am solving with custom kernel for years is
installation system onto hardware not supported by Debian. In
most cases this is disk (raid) controllers supported by drivers
in binary form only (no open source) available for limited list
of distributions like suse or redaht. Few
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:11:51PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
Typical problem I am solving with custom kernel for years is
installation system onto hardware not supported by Debian. In
most cases this is disk (raid) controllers supported by drivers
in binary form only (no open source)
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:33:42PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Why do you need a plain (rather than squashfs) filesystem?
Is it because your custom kernel does not support squashfs?
^^^
First of all this is not my kernel. If we need custom
kernel, we should think about
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:09:36PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
available in binary form only. In this case You should use
binary kernel from redhat or suse. Yes, even in this case You
can take appropriate kernel source and compile kernel modules,
but this is addition work.
I don't
Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
LIVE_LINUX_PACKAGES=kernel-2.6.22
LIVE_LINUX_PACKAGES=none
otherwise lh_chroot_linux-image still installs a debian kernel.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
And with this correction, do You think I will get what I need?
yes; otherwise i would have added other points to solve/do/$whatever in
the last mail of mine :)
And what You think about to include this feature to standard
configuration? That is, instead of making
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:24:49PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
i do not understand. you don't need to make kernel packages yourself,
debian offers binary packages for the linux kernel. what /excately/ do
you want?
Daniel, please read whole this thread from beginning.
If we are using debian
Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
Custom kernel is not debian kernel nigher binary nor source.
i do not care about kernels beeing not packaged in a .deb.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:04:22AM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:24:49PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
i do not understand. you don't need to make kernel packages yourself,
debian offers binary packages for the linux kernel. what /excately/ do
you want?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:03:44PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
i do not care about kernels beeing not packaged in a .deb.
Why? I don't like hardware with non-open source drivers, but in
real life we often should make such systems for ours customers.
**
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:27:51PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:09:36PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
available in binary form only. In this case You should use binary
kernel from redhat or suse. Yes, even in this case You can take
appropriate kernel
I apologize for not searching the list. I will do that for now on before
asking a question.
From what I extracted from previous conversations, my problem is that
initramfs isn't finding my CD ROM. I tried to boot from a CD with a burned
ISO on a separate machine- it was a no go. Either I
13 matches
Mail list logo
