Hello,
I've actually made a small patch to handle file exclusions when
building root file system with mksquashfs. It's in live-helper package,
not live-initramfs as said before, in script live_binary_rootfs.
It uses a new variable, MKSQUASHFS_EXCLUDES, to handle file names to
be
On 06/06/2008, Jordi Pujol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
looking at the changes in live-initramfs v1.132.1
there is the following change:
@@ -979,7 +965,7 @@
rofslist=${image} ${rofslist}
elif [ -f ${image} ]
then
-
El Friday 06 June 2008 16:58:36 Michael Creel va escriure:
These two seem very useful to me:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Jordi Pujol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
use the /etc/fstab file to mount the persistent /home directory and gain
automatic fsck of the partition.
good, that
El Wednesday 04 June 2008 22:48:38 vàreu escriure:
This sounds nice. However, what happens if there is a non-busybox
losetup installed?
now the option is present in the two losetup commands,
Previously the option -f was only available in the standard command losetup,
Assuming that this
El Thursday 05 June 2008 11:34:39 vàreu escriure:
I did not choose to install loop-aes. It only broke my setup.
Observe that the option -r is not present in the Busybox command
losetup, Even we can affirm that it does not matter, due that aufs joins
that loop devices with the options
Hello,
About live-initramfs, I'm ahead of a small problem with mksquashfs,
I'd like to know if it's a known problem :
To do a live system with a small size, I choose to remove from squashfs
all files from /usr/share/doc, /usr/share/man and /usr/share/locale. I
tried before to remove
Marco Amadori wrote:
A part the IRC list were longer and I asked you what you needed and
implemented mosts of your taste requirements, I think I actually FIXED[0]
coding style:
no. live-snapshot is part of userland, not initramfs. therefore
live-helper code style applies. that's what i said
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
No critics, but please discuss without prejudice.
i don't have prejudices, really.
So please, this is not a battle for this particular commit, just that I'm
scared about the your concepts of cleanness, separation and uglyness [0]
and beauty [0]
Marco Amadori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 04 June 2008, 15:11:42, Otavio Salvador wrote:
So please, this is not a battle for this particular commit, just that I'm
scared about the your concepts of cleanness, separation and uglyness
[0] and beauty [0] required for future work.
On 03/06/2008, Jordi Pujol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El Tuesday 03 June 2008 18:13:18 Daniel Baumann va escriure:
Extra prod to Jordy :) As you pointed out several times, you're using
several patches for live-initramfs. Please do send them in.
Hello all,
Thanks Daniel,
Now
El Tuesday 03 June 2008 18:13:18 Daniel Baumann va escriure:
Extra prod to Jordy :) As you pointed out several times, you're using
several patches for live-initramfs. Please do send them in.
Hello all,
Thanks Daniel,
Now already there are large differences between the estandard and my own
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 23:01:59 Daniel Baumann wrote:
- don't change unrelated things
- don't change coding style
A part the IRC list were longer and I asked you what you needed and
implemented mosts of your taste requirements, I think I actually FIXED[0]
coding style:
$
12 matches
Mail list logo
