Hey,
On 06/11/20 11:03 am, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Abhijith,
>
> If I am parsing your note for cacti in dla-needed correctly, does it
> make sense to remove the package from dla-needed file altogether
> (since all remaining issues are no-dsa and can be fixed with the next
> upload)?
Yes, it
Hey,
On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 8:55 PM Abhijith PA wrote:
> > If I am parsing your note for cacti in dla-needed correctly, does it
> > make sense to remove the package from dla-needed file altogether
> > (since all remaining issues are no-dsa and can be fixed with the next
> > upload)?
>
> Yes, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- ---
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2439-1 debian-...@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Utkarsh Gupta
November 07, 2020
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 23:45:13 +1100
Source: libexif
Binary: libexif-dev libexif12
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.21-2+deb9u5
Distribution: stretch-security
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 12:52:26 +
Source: raptor2
Binary: libraptor2-dev libraptor2-0 raptor2-utils libraptor2-doc
libraptor2-0-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.0.14-1+deb9u1
Distribution: stretch-security
Urgency: high
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2438-1debian-...@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Chris Lamb
November 07, 2020
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2437-1debian-...@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Chris Lamb
November 07, 2020
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 12:28:14 +
Source: krb5
Binary: krb5-user krb5-kdc krb5-kdc-ldap krb5-admin-server krb5-kpropd
krb5-multidev libkrb5-dev libkrb5-dbg krb5-pkinit krb5-otp krb5-k5tls krb5-doc
libkrb5-3 libgssapi-krb5-2
