Re: Closing of buster-backports?

On 2022-09-05 18:47, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: Hello, Now that buster is LTS and no longer officially supported, should the -backports pocket be closed? AFAIK, buster just receives the security uploads by the -security pocket and shouldn't have -backports open anymore. I hope I am not mistaken or

Re: Vulnerability in pcs or is it in more generic code?

On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 21:38 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > I agree that it is good to fix the pcs package, but shouldn't we fix > the default umask in general? > I would argue that the default umask is insecure. bookworm login sets new user home directories to secure permissions: $ grep -E

Closing of buster-backports?

Hello, Now that buster is LTS and no longer officially supported, should the -backports pocket be closed? AFAIK, buster just receives the security uploads by the -security pocket and shouldn't have -backports open anymore. I hope I am not mistaken or missing anything? FTR, packages are still

Vulnerability in pcs or is it in more generic code?

Hi fellow Debian LTS and Debian Security memebers When triaging the packages for LTS I looked into the package pcs. I saw that it was already added to DSA needed so I have added it to DLA needed as well. However when reading the correction for it I started to think that the vulnerability may not

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 3093-1] rails security update

[[resending with different mail address due couple of MTA rejections]] On 05/09/22 06:28 PM, Abhijith PA wrote: > Hey, > > On 05/09/22 06:09 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Hi Abhijith, > > > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 5:04 PM Abhijith PA wrote: > > > CVE-2022-32224 > > > > > > When

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 3093-1] rails security update

Hi Abhijith, On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 5:04 PM Abhijith PA wrote: > CVE-2022-32224 > > When serialized columns that use YAML (the default) are > deserialized, Rails uses YAML.unsafe_load to convert the YAML data > in to Ruby objects. If an attacker can manipulate data in the >