On Fri, 2022-09-09 at 22:41 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I see that I was not clear what I meant with "in general" :-)
Woops, sorry for the noise :)
> Here I found how the generic source code looks like:
> https://rubydoc.info/gems/thin/1.3.1/Thin%2FBackends%2FUnixServer:connect
>
> You can
Hi follow LTS contributors
It is this kind of question again. "Is it worth it?".
We have CVE-2020-7677 on node-thenify.
According to popcorn we have three installations. That is of course a lower
end number since popcorn only counts the popcorn users, but anyway it
indicates that the
Hi Paul
I see that I was not clear what I meant with "in general" :-)
In the fix for pcs
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/commit/de068e2066e377d1cc77edf25aed0198e4c77f7b
you can see a comment that there is a change from umask(0) to umask(0x077)
It was this umask(0) (in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3101-1debian-...@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
September 09, 2022
Hi Abhijith,
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 6:04 PM Abhijith PA wrote:
> Can you share how autopkgtest.kali.org service setup and how
> is it running. I am using https://ci.debian.net/doc/file.HACKING.html
> to reproduce this. What is your rack server like and you also run any
> proxy server.
It's also
Hello Raphael,
On 07/09/22 11:10 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello Abhijith and the LTS team,
>
> in Kali we have applied the last ruby-active* security updates and this
> broke the web API part of autopkgtest.kali.org.
Can you share how autopkgtest.kali.org service setup and how
is it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 12:30:48 +0200
Source: libxslt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.32-2.2~deb10u2
Distribution: buster-security
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group
Changed-By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Changes:
libxslt
