* Antoine Beaupré <anar...@orangeseeds.org> [2018-02-16 21:01:48 CET]:
> On 2017-12-22 13:53:46, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> > * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> [2017-12-19 20:04:57 CET]:
> > Given that you would be paid to do the update and me not there is
&g
Hi there,
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2017-12-19 20:04:57 CET]:
> On 26/10/17 22:59, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > as the irssi issues are already fixed upstream[1], I added you to
> > dla-needed.txt
> > for it.
> >
> > If you don't want to take care of this update, please
eezy.
>
> I am not here avoiding do things or trying to make your life difficult.
> I am on your side. If I am able to do that I will.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On 2017-09-05 08:06, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > erm, those two are already in the stretch-p
that for you, wheezy and jessie. Should I send
> > a debdiff to you for revision?
> >
> > Thanks for your fast reply.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> > Em 31 de ago de 2017 05:04, "Rhonda D'Vine" <rho...@deb.at> escreveu:
> >
> > H
ie and stretch.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> 2017-06-27 15:33 GMT-03:00 Antoine Beaupré <anar...@orangeseeds.org>:
>
> > On 2017-06-09 10:22:37, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> > > Dear Ola,
> > >
> > > this is on my board. The issue isn't that pressing, and
Dear Ola,
this is on my board. The issue isn't that pressing, and I want to fix
it for stretch and jessie too, and only do the update for wheezy after
those got approved (which I expect). If it won't be approved for
stretch and jessie there is quite little sense to invest to fix it just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 16:10:19 +0200
Source: irssi
Binary: irssi irssi-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.8.15-5+deb7u1
Distribution: wheezy-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Gerfried Fuchs <rho...@debian.org>
Changed-By:
Hi,
* Raphael Hertzog [2016-11-25 12:04:40 CET]:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> > currently open in the Wheezy version of irssi:
> >
Hi,
* Holger Levsen [2016-05-19 13:45:56 CEST]:
> appearantly some maintainers don't want to support backports in
> wheezy-backports anymore, saying wheezy is oldstable now (und
> unsupported by Debian proper, "just" maintained by the Debian LTS team.)
That's fine