Re: Call for tests/review: glib2.0/buster

2023-09-01 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 08:59:50PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > On 30/08/2023 02:13, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:53:54PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > Dear all > > > > > > I've prepared a glib2.0 update for buster (and I am working for older >

Re: Call for tests/review: glib2.0/buster

2023-09-01 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, On 30/08/2023 02:13, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:53:54PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: Dear all I've prepared a glib2.0 update for buster (and I am working for older releases). I think it should be ready, all the test pass. But since there were some

Re: Call for tests/review: glib2.0/buster

2023-08-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:53:54PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > Dear all > > I've prepared a glib2.0 update for buster (and I am working for older > releases). I think it should be ready, all the test pass. But since > there were some regressions with a first set of patches, it would be

Call for tests/review: glib2.0/buster

2023-08-20 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Dear all I've prepared a glib2.0 update for buster (and I am working for older releases). I think it should be ready, all the test pass. But since there were some regressions with a first set of patches, it would be great if someone could give it a try. The packages are available following these