not be
>> > in dla-needed.
>> > There is just one CVE to be fixed and that one is marked as no-dsa with
>> > note minor issue.
>> >
>> > I will therefore do the following.
>> > Change the no-dsa to postponed and remove runc from dla-needed.
>> >
>> > If anyone have any objections, please let me know.
>>
>
> > in dla-needed.
> > There is just one CVE to be fixed and that one is marked as no-dsa with
> > note minor issue.
> >
> > I will therefore do the following.
> > Change the no-dsa to postponed and remove runc from dla-needed.
> >
> > If anyone have any objections, please let me know.
>
and that one is marked as no-dsa with
note minor issue.
I will therefore do the following.
Change the no-dsa to postponed and remove runc from dla-needed.
If anyone have any objections, please let me know.
Hi fellow LTS contributors
I was about to assign runc to myself but realized that it should not be in
dla-needed.
There is just one CVE to be fixed and that one is marked as no-dsa with
note minor issue.
I will therefore do the following.
Change the no-dsa to postponed and remove runc from dla
