Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:21:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Update security-support-limited from 1:12+2022.08.12 from unstable, > > thus adding golang and khtml > > not adding cython, python2.7 and python-stdlib-extensions and mosjs78 > > as they should still be

Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/08/2022 11:19, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:30:03AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: - today prepare buster branch for release (33% done, see below) - today until aug 23: possible further updates to the master branch which then get copied to the buster branch - aug 23:

Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:30:03AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > - today prepare buster branch for release (33% done, see below) > - today until aug 23: possible further updates to the master branch > which then get copied to the buster branch > - aug 23: upload & SRM bug > - aug 27: freeze > -

Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 06:07:14PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > just to clarify the things. If the "-limited" file will be versioned, > I think it is better not to include python2.7 or cython > into the buster-file, as we still support them for buster. But, > some internal scripts should be

Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-16 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Holger, just to clarify the things. If the "-limited" file will be versioned, I think it is better not to include python2.7 or cython into the buster-file, as we still support them for buster. But, some internal scripts should be modified in this case to use the suffix. If it remains

Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > Regarding your question, if there are not other objections, I would say > please go ahead with an upload (despite python2.7). Anton, what do you mean with that python2.7 comment? pochu also said on irc: h01ger: I think it makes

Re: updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-15 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Holger, thanks for taking care of it! Regarding your question, if there are not other objections, I would say please go ahead with an upload (despite python2.7). Regards Anton Am Sa., 13. Aug. 2022 um 11:30 Uhr schrieb Holger Levsen < hol...@layer-acht.org>: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at

updating debian-security-support(.limited) in buster and bullseye (Re: EOL candidates for security-support-ended.deb10 (recap))

2022-08-13 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:06:21PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > yes, I have uploading debian-security-support to buster for the last > point release on my agenda and will do that upload as needed. As there has now been a date announced for the final buster point release, the timeline for this