On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:21:45AM +, stefa...@debian.org wrote:
> From buster onwards, we've been providing stable updates, rather than
> backports.
cool!
> My issue here wasn't really about content, but about versioning and
> changelog history. Either way, the package would have the same
Hi Holger (2022.10.31_23:43:42_+)
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 02:08:18PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> > Back in those days, we used to publish distro-info-data updates via
> > backports, not stable updates. So there were backports published to both
> > stretch-backports and jessie-backports.
hi,
first: thanks for maintaining d-i-d and for adding (E)LTS to it!
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 02:08:18PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Back in those days, we used to publish distro-info-data updates via
> backports, not stable updates. So there were backports published to both
>
Hi Stefano,
I would say we should rely only on release and security suites, Backports
are optional.
Just be sure to provide a smooth upgrade from both release and backport
suites.
Regards
Anton
Am So., 30. Okt. 2022 um 15:08 Uhr schrieb Stefano Rivera <
stefa...@debian.org>:
> I'm an
I'm an uploader for distro-info-data (a data only package like tzdata,
mostly useful to distro developers, but also potentially sysadmin
tools). We try to get updates out to all supported releases, but I
haven't been updating it in (E)LTS, before I joined Freexian & LTS.
I just did a round of
