-=| Deepak Tripathi, Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 09:07:15PM +0530 |=-
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.17-4
of my package libtie-cache-perl.
Deepak,
You're a member of pkg-perl Is there any particular reason not to add
libtie-cache-perl to group's packages and
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:06:10PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote..
I looked at rhinote again. Looks o.k. except for one small thing
in the debian/changelog ...
Fixed. The package is at the usual location.
Andrea
Your md5sum check between upstream's file and your .orig.tar.gz file
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:57:33 -0500
Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your md5sum check between upstream's file and your .orig.tar.gz file
do not match. This needs to be addressed.
This is quite strange.
I'll check as soon as the upstream site goes back online -- there seems to
be some
Hi guys,
I made a new version of bitcollider package (revision: 0.6.0-1.1).
Can I safely upload it on mentors ?? I need to respect any policy before
upload ??
I sent an email to old mantainer but I didn't receive any response.
Regards,
Salvatore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:37:11 +0100
Andrea Bolognani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:57:33 -0500
Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your md5sum check between upstream's file and your .orig.tar.gz file
do not match. This needs to be addressed.
This is quite strange.
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:45:24PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote..
So apparently the different md5sum is due to the fact the upstream
tarball was created from a FAT filesystem, while the one in
Debian's archives was created by dpkg-buildpackage on a GNU/Linux
system (compression level
Hi Dam,
there is not a particular reason but when i first started this package i was
not member after that i was become an member and after which i am
maintaining in perl it is under Debian-perl Group.
PS: I will put next release from Debian-perl
Thanks
Deepak Tripathi
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Salvatore Ansani wrote:
Hi guys, I made a new version of bitcollider package (revision:
0.6.0-1.1).
Can I safely upload it on mentors ?? I need to respect any policy before
upload ??
I sent an email to old mantainer but I didn't receive any response.
As I understand
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package gruler.
* Package name: gruler
Version: 0.8-1
Upstream Author: Ian McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL: http://gnomecoder.wordpress.com/screenruler/
* License: GPLv2+
Section: utils
It only build one binary, with the same name as
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:45:24PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote..
So apparently the different md5sum is due to the fact the upstream
tarball was created from a FAT filesystem, while the one in
Debian's archives was created by dpkg-buildpackage on a GNU/Linux
system (compression level
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:07 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is another one of my way too intrusive NMUs that closes RC bug
#465633 and bug #400257 as well as quite a bit of package cleanup,
standards update, etc.
I've been busy with other things elsewhere but some recent uploads from
mentors are confusing me and potentially giving the wrong impression to
those whom we mentor and sponsor, IMHO.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/03/msg2.html
I hope to see you all there fixing bugs
2. Perhaps it would be better to have all of the source code
changes done through dpatch or quilt. I know this is an NMU and
being unobtrusive is important, but there are quite a few
upstream source code changes which I think would be better off
in a patch system.
I have a collection of files that I wish to put into a debian package.
none need compilation as they are just scripts and config files and
there is no Makefile of any kind. From my reading, I've made a .tar
file with my directory structure in it then run dh_make and then
edited the control file
On 04/03/2008, Neil Williams wrote:
So why are we doing this now? This is an NMU - minimal changes
scenario.
Well, maybe the world isn't *that* black and white. Remember, NMUs are
a way to help people fix their bugs, get their packages back into
shape, etc.
IANADD, etc., but I already got a
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 04/03/2008, Neil Williams wrote:
So why are we doing this now? This is an NMU - minimal changes
scenario.
Well, maybe the world isn't *that* black and white. Remember, NMUs are
a way to help people fix their bugs, get their packages back into
shape, etc.
On Sat 23 Feb 08 14:02, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:46:27PM -0300, Joel Franco wrote:
A long description is really difficult because the 2 words say all :)
no, they don't. Imagine you would be someone who is interested in
cloning a system, but you never heard about
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither orange in the archive nor the result of your NMU even work for
zip files (with unzip installed) nor other files where it should work.
From strace, it looks like it is acually extracting stuff, but then
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:06 PM, William Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there an example of a rules file for this case somewhere?
Will
I would recommend you to take alook at the font packages
for example, ttf-summersby which simply installs a ttf font type
and doesn't compile anything
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
Note:
only fix bugs that are already filed to the BTS
The rest of the normal NMU rules still apply:
The following quote invites other fixes as well!
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 23:37 +, Neil Williams wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.3.dsc
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rcalc/news/20080303T143226Z.html
This NMU seems to introduce more changes than allowed via NMU. So I
agree with Neil Williams on his
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 21:31 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
I agree with William,
I'm glad that you agree with Neil Williams.
I need to watch my Ps and Qs. However, in this
case voc is MIA.
I don't think that Sam is MIA.
So ideally I suppose what I should do is orphan the
package and
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 23:37 +, Neil Williams wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.3.dsc
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rcalc/news/20080303T143226Z.html
This NMU seems to
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 14:57 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 23:37 +, Neil Williams wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.3.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Wise wrote:
If you are in NM, a DM, an AM, just having packages sponsored by DDs or
maybe recently became a DD, I'd love to hear from you.
Hello,
For the reason which I choose debian because it is the high quality
distro that I ever met.
25 matches
Mail list logo
