Hi, Joachim.
On Nov 18 2009, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:30:33 -0200 schrieb Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
But what do you people use to edit manpages that you maintain
frequently?
I find the simplest way is to use *ManEdit*.
Is this the same as gmanedit (that's the
2009/11/18 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
On Nov 18 2009, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
I find the simplest way is to use *ManEdit*.
Is this the same as gmanedit (that's the only one that seems to be
available in the archives)? I remember having used it some ages ago and
I wasn't impressed, but
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes:
OK, since the project strongly advises for the availability of
manpages (and I love manpages), comes the question: what do you people
use to type manpages?
Type the page as a reStructuredText document, then render it to a
manpage with ‘rst2man’
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes:
With TeX, BTW, we have some extensions (or even reimplementations) that
allow us to type things in UTF-8 directly, instead of using escape
sequences like in older TeX (e.g., Rogério instead of Rog\'erio, in
utf-8 or in latin1, though some care should be
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br writes:
OK, since the project strongly advises for the availability of manpages
(and I love manpages), comes the question: what do you people use to
type manpages?
POD. But then, I wrote the tools that convert POD to *roff, so I would.
The best so far that I
Hello,
Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:33:22 -0200 wrote
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
I find the simplest way is to use *ManEdit*.
Is this the same as gmanedit (that's the only one that seems to be
available in the archives)? I remember having used it some ages ago and
I wasn't impressed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I have persuaded a debian developer to have a look at my package and, if
it is of sufficient quality, sponsor it. Therefore I am no longer
looking for a sponsor for my package :-)
Kind regards
Bas Roos
Bas Roos wrote:
Dear mentors,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
I have checked the repository:
* manedit is in Lenny and Squeeze
manedit has been removed from squeeze since February.
* gmanedit is only in Etch and Squeeze
Now I have installed the Squeeze version of gmanedit.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:56:10PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Type the page as a reStructuredText document, then render it to a
manpage with ‘rst2man’
[...]
Awesome! This thread already had me thinking, There should be a
reST to TROFF/GROFF path--if there's not I guess I'll write one. I,
too, had
Hi, Joachim.
On Nov 16 2009, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Ok, I have to include intltool in the build dependencies. Please can
you say me the other minor things, so I can check them, too.
Well, this is just a quick look at the package:
* the debian/README file talks about installation of some
Hi, Russ.
On Nov 18 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
Yup. :) And there's a nice Emacs mode for POD that does coloration
and whatnot. (There is for *roff as well, but I hate typing *roff
directly.)
Well, it seems that we have two strong contenders: POD and reST. Things
look brighter for a more
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.38-1
of my package windowlab.
It builds these binary packages:
windowlab - Small and simple Amiga-like window manager
The package appears to be lintian clean.
It also builds well using pbuilder.
The upload would fix these bugs:
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 18:14:09 Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Uploaded.
Thanks :) It was just taking dust. I will restart improvement now.
There is a lintian warning that a build dependency on a recent enough
version of debhelper is missing, this should be fixed in the next upload
Hello Rogério,
Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:08 -0200 schrieb
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
oh oh, so a long list!
* the debian/README file talks about installation of some
programs; this is useless if you are installing a precompiled package,
because you, the maintainer, will have
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:44:49PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
Reject Reasons:
wmaker-data_0.9~3-3.dsc refers to wmaker-data_0.9~3.orig.tar.gz, but I can't
find it in the queue or in the pool.
wmaker-data_0.9~3-3.dsc refers to wmaker-data_0.9~3.orig-iconsPaul.tar.gz,
but I
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:17:57 Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:44:49PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
Reject Reasons:
wmaker-data_0.9~3-3.dsc refers to wmaker-data_0.9~3.orig.tar.gz, but I
can't find it in the queue or in the pool.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package wixi.
* Package name: wixi
Version : 1.10-1
Upstream Author : Kess Remmelzwaal k.remmelzw...@planet.nl
* URL : http://wixi.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Section : utils
It builds these
The Fungi fu...@yuggoth.org writes:
I, too, had resolved recently to start maintaining all my project
documentation in reST. Not that I find building/editing manpages
directly in vi to be that hard, but it's still laborious and
time-consuming. I'll be happy to contribute fixes to this for any
Ben Finney wrote:
The Fungi fu...@yuggoth.org writes:
I, too, had resolved recently to start maintaining all my project
documentation in reST. Not that I find building/editing manpages
directly in vi to be that hard, but it's still laborious and
time-consuming. I'll be happy to contribute
Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.38-1
of my package windowlab.
It builds these binary packages:
windowlab - Small and simple Amiga-like window manager
The package appears to be lintian clean.
It also builds well using pbuilder.
2009/11/18 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
* in patch 01_no-mount-warning.patch, only linux is checked. What about
the kFreeBSD's? Any bug with them is now considered release critical.
Please, see if my comments apply or if they can be ignored.
A clarification to this:
FTBFS bugs are only
Hi, Joachim.
On Nov 18 2009, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:08 -0200 schrieb
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
oh oh, so a long list!
Well, I thought that you wanted some comments. :-)
I still have not understand the difference between README and
README.Debian. Perhaps
Hi, people.
I just received a bug report telling me that youtube has made 1080p (aka
Full HD resolution) videos available.
I have just updated youtube-dl to grab those movies if you select to
download the best quality video available.
The package is at:
dget
23 matches
Mail list logo
