Re: $FOO-Forge sites and ‘uscan’

2009-11-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: I am looking at a package whose source files are published at URL:http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=32627 which appears to be a $FOO-Forge site. This means we get the joy of opaque download links, no

RFS: bashare

2009-11-25 Thread guido iodice
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bashare. * Package name: bashare Version : 0.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Guido Iodice * URL : https://launchpad.net/bashare * License : GPLv3 Section : net It builds these binary packages: bashare

Re: RFS: bashare

2009-11-25 Thread Paul Gevers
I removed extra files (see lintian log) but I'm in dubt about debian native warning: actually bashare *is* a debian native package also in upstream. Your package is not debian native, your website says: Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, OpenSuse, etc. packages Another question is about manpages: Is it

Re: RFS: bashare

2009-11-25 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
11/25/2009 02:38 PM, Paul Gevers:: Your package is not debian native, your website says: Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, OpenSuse, etc. packages That means: It's easy to install on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, OpenSuse, etc. But, on the right size of that page you can see two links: - one for debs - one

Re: RFS: bashare

2009-11-25 Thread Paul Gevers
That means: It's easy to install on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, OpenSuse, etc. But, on the right size of that page you can see two links: - one for debs - one for the tarball That doesn't matter. Debian native means that the package only makes sense on Debian (and derived) systems. Usually the

Re: RFS: bashare

2009-11-25 Thread Zaar Hai
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl wrote: That means: It's easy to install on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, OpenSuse, etc. But, on the right size of that page you can see two links: - one for debs - one for the tarball That doesn't matter. Debian native means that the

New developer.

2009-11-25 Thread Nuno Paquete
Hi everyone, I want to be a part of Debian developers team and I'm interested in some orphaned projects. I'm reading a lot about Debian developing and how to be a Debian developer but I have some questions to do. How can I get GnuPG key? I don't know anybody in the team and I've read that I need

Re: RFS: bashare

2009-11-25 Thread Ben Finney
guido iodice guido.iod...@gmail.com writes: It builds these binary packages: bashare- BaShare helps you share files with your friends Please write a synopsis that says what the package “is”. Example (you'll have to change it so it's accurate): Description: simple file-sharing HTTP

Re: New developer.

2009-11-25 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Nuno Paquete nunopaqu...@gmail.com [091125 14:18]: How can I get GnuPG key? You create one yourself. I don't know anybody in the team and You know, that you need someone to advocate you? I've read that I need someone to give me one. Where did you read this? I'm thinking about

Re: New developer.

2009-11-25 Thread Ben Finney
Nuno Paquete nunopaqu...@gmail.com writes: I want to be a part of Debian developers team and I'm interested in some orphaned projects. Thank you for your interest in helping Debian. Maintaining an orphaned package is a very good way to help. How can I get GnuPG key? I don't know anybody in

Re: RFS: spring

2009-11-25 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 23:01, Marco Amadori marco.amad...@gmail.com wrote: * License         : GPL and BSD Does it come with a fully free (and properly licensed) mod, now? That was the blocker for me, back when I tried to package it. Richard PS: If not, there is always contrib -- To

Re: RFS: libplist (Adopted, updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Julien Lavergne
Hi, Yes, strangely, the symbols are different if the package is build on i386 or on amd64. I removed the symbols file until I find why there is such behavior. The actual version on mentors should build fine now. Regards, Julien Lavergne Le samedi 21 novembre 2009 à 09:09 -0400, Julien Lavergne

RFS: zerofree (updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-2 of my package zerofree. It builds these binary packages: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these long-standing wishlist bugs: 504697,

Re: New developer.

2009-11-25 Thread Nuno Paquete
Hi, You know, that you need someone to advocate you? I tryed to contact the only person that is listed in portuguese programmers but I get the following message: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: vill...@debian.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google

Re: RFS: zerofree (updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thibaut Paumard schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-2 of my package zerofree. It builds these binary packages: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems The package appears to be lintian

Re: RFS: netdiscover (updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netdiscover - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget

RFS: mppenc (NMU, fixes ftbfs)

2009-11-25 Thread Cristian Greco
[ please keep CC as I'm not subscribed ] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16-1.1 of the package mppenc. The upload would fix these bugs: 449922, 480042, 540131 (ftbfs on hurd and kfreebsd plus minor fixes -- no RC bugs). The package can be found on

Re: New developer.

2009-11-25 Thread Jan Dittberner
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:15:37PM +, Nuno Paquete wrote: I tryed to contact the only person that is listed in portuguese programmers but I get the following message: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: vill...@debian.org looks like an issue for

RFS: nd (updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-3 of my package nd. It builds these binary packages: nd - Tiny little command line WebDAV interface The package appears to be lintian clean. It builds equally cleanly on testing as on stable. The upload would fix these

Re: RFS: libplist (Adopted, updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Bradley Smith
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:10:59 +0100 Julien Lavergne julien.laver...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yes, strangely, the symbols are different if the package is build on i386 or on amd64. I removed the symbols file until I find why there is such behavior. The actual version on mentors should build fine

Re: New developer.

2009-11-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/11/09 at 14:26 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hi! * Nuno Paquete nunopaqu...@gmail.com [091125 14:18]: How can I get GnuPG key? You create one yourself. I don't know anybody in the team and You know, that you need someone to advocate you? I've read that I

Re: New developer.

2009-11-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nuno Paquete schrieb: Hi everyone, I want to be a part of Debian developers team and I'm interested in some orphaned projects. I'm reading a lot about Debian developing and how to be a Debian developer but I have some questions to do. How can

Improve the Val(a)ide package

2009-11-25 Thread Nicolas Joseph
Hello, I would like improve the debian package of Val(a)IDE (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547665). I have already fixed lintian errors and several warnings in the development version, but some warning persist: W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib

Re: Improve the Val(a)ide package

2009-11-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Nicolas Joseph gege2...@redaction-developpez.com wrote: W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/valide/plugins/file-browser/file-browser.png W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/valide/plugins/opened-documents/opened-documents.png W:

Re: RFS: spring

2009-11-25 Thread Marco Amadori
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 20:11:27 Richard Hartmann wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 23:01, Marco Amadori marco.amad...@gmail.com wrote: * License : GPL and BSD Does it come with a fully free (and properly licensed) mod, now? That was the blocker for me, back when I tried to

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ignace Mouzannar schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-11 of my package iptotal. It builds these binary packages: iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP The package appears to be

Re: Improve the Val(a)ide package

2009-11-25 Thread Nicolas Joseph
Thank's for your answer! I'm the upstream, and I think I understood the litian warnings but not their consequenses. W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/valide/plugins/file-browser/file-browser.png W: valide-common: image-file-in-usr-lib

Re: RFS: mppenc (NMU, fixes ftbfs)

2009-11-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 06:54:36PM +0100, Cristian Greco a écrit : I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16-1.1 of the package mppenc. The upload would fix these bugs: 449922, 480042, 540131 (ftbfs on hurd and kfreebsd plus minor fixes -- no RC bugs). Dear Cristian, the

Re: RFS: mppenc (NMU, fixes ftbfs)

2009-11-25 Thread Cristian Greco
[ CCing to pkg-multimedia, please keep me in CC ] On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:07:45 +0900 Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: Le Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 06:54:36PM +0100, Cristian Greco a écrit : I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.16-1.1 of the package mppenc. The upload

Re: RFS: mppenc (NMU, fixes ftbfs)

2009-11-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear Jorge and everybody, about the future of the mppenc package, which has an unfixed important bug since three monthes: Le Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:54:25AM +0100, Cristian Greco a écrit : I'd propose my NMU as a short-term solution, or maybe poking someone on pkg-multimedia team (CCing) for