On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oops, don't know why I broke off mid-sentence like that. My point was
that
porting 0 A.D. to work with newer versions of Spidermonkey seems to be
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:33:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
The git-remote-hg project seems like a much more natural way to
interact with remote hg repositories. I saw some evidence on the git
list and wiki that git-remote-foo is the way forward for foreign VCS
support in git. There was even a
Hello Karl,
Am 2011-04-11 12:50:11, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Have you tried any of the resources at [1]?
Personally I use a wrapper around apt-ftparchive and a couple of config
files.
I use it already, any I have a nn TByte Mirror gotten since Slink (any
packages ever hit unstable),
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm, I've never thought of porting 0 A.D. to an entirely different JS
engine as an option. Is V8's API relatively stable compared to Spidermonkey?
V8's ABI looks very unstable, not sure about the API.
I am not
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 06:04:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
from the replies I've seen so far, it seems that embedding Spidermonkey
code in 0 A.D.'s source is a no-no, or at least strongly discouraged.
Maybe porting to another JavaScript engine (like Google V8) is the best
long-term
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:26:08AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 06:04:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
from the replies I've seen so far, it seems that embedding Spidermonkey
code in 0 A.D.'s source is a no-no, or at least strongly discouraged.
Maybe porting to another
Hi Julián,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:07:13AM -0500, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.10-1 of my package tucan.
It builds these binary packages:
tucan - Download and upload manager for 1-Click Hosters
The package appears to
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Michelle Konzack wrote:
if I have a mirror whichcontain oldstable, stable, testing and unstable,
is there a maintainer script to create the Packages/Source files for
each release correctly?
Both debmirror and the official mirror scripts can handle this just fine,
and
From: Edscott Wilson Garcia edscott.wilson.gar...@gmail.com
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: rodent
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rodent.
* Package name: rodent
Version : 4.6.2
Upstream Author : edsc...@xfce.org
* URL :
Hi,
I have a package which builds one architecture dependent and one
architecture independent binary package and uses dephelper 7. Due to
the weird and kind of incomplete upstream build code, I had to
override the dh_autoinstall target with an override_dh_auto_install
target in my debian/rules.
Hi
On 04/11/2011 01:59 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Good evening Mentors,
if I have a mirror whichcontain oldstable, stable, testing and unstable,
is there a maintainer script to create the Packages/Source files for
each release correctly?
Currently I have for each release a seperated
Hi,
Marc Haber mh+debian-ment...@zugschlus.de writes:
I have a package which builds one architecture dependent and one
architecture independent binary package and uses dephelper 7. Due to
the weird and kind of incomplete upstream build code, I had to
override the dh_autoinstall target with an
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9+20071227-5
of my package dacco.
It builds these binary packages:
dacco-common - Catalan/English dictionary (xml files)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 620706
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-1
of my package qdacco.
It builds these binary packages:
libqdaccolib-dev - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (devel)
libqdaccolib0.7 - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (runtime)
qdacco -
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Philip Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:33:47PM +0100, Philip Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011
Hi,
Just to introduce myself. I'm a user of gnuradio. Also an experienced
developer. The last 10 years mainly in java. Did a lot of commercial
work in C and C++ in the previous century (not gcc). I also packaged
some bash scripts in a debian package. So now i took it upon myself to
get
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, don't know why I broke off mid-sentence like that. My point was that
porting 0 A.D. to work with newer versions of Spidermonkey seems to be a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package parallel.
* Package name: parallel
Version : 20110205-3
Upstream Author : Ole Tange pri...@tange.dk
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
* License : GPL (ver.3 or later)
Section : utils
Hello,
I plan to create a Debian package of a new software which only have a git
repository, but no archive file. How should I create such a Debian
package?
Is it enough to copy the git repo from the internet, remove .git/, rename
the main directory of the sources (package-version) and run
CC-ing pkg-games
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.3-1
of my package gmult.
It builds these binary packages:
gmult - figure out which letters are which numbers
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 544923, 622219
The
On 04/09/2011 12:06 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Sebastian (2011.04.09_10:44:03_+0200)
Out of curiosity: what are the pros and cons of dh_python2 and where do
dh_pysupport and dh_python2 differ? In view of #617001 I thought I'd stick
with
the successor of dh_pycentral.
dh_python2 is
George Zarkadas wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
parallel - Execute jobs in parallel locally or using remote computers
I have not figured out what to do about moreutils containing a
/usr/bin/parallel that is not entirely command-line compatable with this
one. #597050
--
see shy jo
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.8-par-2
of my package pdnsd.
It builds these binary packages:
pdnsd - Proxy DNS Server
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 617644, 617659, 617913, 618671
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-1
of my package alure.
It builds these binary packages:
alure-doc - AL Utilities REtooled (documentation)
libalure1 - AL Utilities REtooled (shared library)
libalure1-dbg - AL Utilities REtooled (debugging symbols)
libalure1-dev
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sludge.
* Package name: sludge
Version : 2.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Tim Furnish, Rikard Peterson, Tobias
Hansentobias@gmx.de
* URL : http://opensludge.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL/GPL
Section
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package out-of-order.
* Package name: out-of-order
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Tim Furnisht...@hungrysoftware.com
* URL : http://outoforder.adventuredevelopers.com
* License : Freeware with permission to
Am 11.04.2011 23:39, schrieb Tobias Hansen:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sludge.
I forgot to mention that this package depends on alure 1.1, see my other
RFS.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
The next parallel release from that in the package (20110322) includes
the --tollef switch and a site-wide config file (/etc/parallel/config)
to address this issue.
Thus parallel can install by default with --tollef activated in the
config file, replacing the /usr/bin/parallel executable
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Hello,
I plan to create a Debian package of a new software which only have a git
repository, but no archive file. How should I create such a Debian
package?
Is it enough to copy the git repo from the internet,
* Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com, 2011-04-11, 18:52:
If there is really no release (and never going to be),
(You can never know that...)
just pick a nice round number (such as 1.0), and keep git off that.
Your version ID would look something like:
1.0[~|+]gitMMDD.HASHHASHHASH-1
Nothing appears to be depending on those libraries so there is nothing
blocking their removal.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
This may be a FAQ but I could not find the answer in the documentation:
How are directories managed? When does a directory get deleted? What is the
lifetime of a directory? Is a directory owned by a specific package?
Which packages are alowed to deposit files in a specific directory? What
Hi all,
Few days ago my package was uploaded however it didn't builds properly
with some architectures like PPC its building log is [1] basically says:
Use of uninitialized value $ENV{HOME} in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Source/Package.pm line 258.
It worked fine with
The issue seems to be in your upstream's setup.py, not in debhelper as
you suggest.
You cannot rely on a home directory being present on the buildds and
should not write anything to it if it exists.
The correct fix in this case would to be send upstream a patch so that
it building does not touch
On Apr 11, 2011 5:54 PM, Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-1
of my package alure.
It builds these binary packages:
alure-doc - AL Utilities REtooled (documentation)
libalure1 - AL Utilities REtooled (shared library)
35 matches
Mail list logo