Re: New contributors: please come to Debconf and/or Debcamp

2011-05-09 Thread Adnan Hodzic
Asheesh, Thank you for this email, I couldn't agree more with everything you said. Just wanted to send an update that we extended sponsored registrations until May 19th so there's still time to register! I personally would like to encourage everybody to register and request sponsorship, see you

Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-09 Thread Etienne Millon
Hello, As the usual disclaimer says, please not that I am not a DD and so, I can not sponsor this package. However here is my review of gtkpod_2.0.0-1 (md5sum of dsc in case it changed : c9d4216c068873d3939f310de582c671). - it builds in a clean chroot. However dpkg-shlibdeps complains about

Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-09 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
On 09/05/2011 10:53, Etienne Millon wrote: Hello, Hi! As the usual disclaimer says, please not that I am not a DD and so, I can not sponsor this package. However here is my review of gtkpod_2.0.0-1 (md5sum of dsc in case it changed : c9d4216c068873d3939f310de582c671). - it builds in a

Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-09 Thread Etienne Millon
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: - debian/rules : - why do you remove RPATHs from executables and binary ? It's stated briefly in NEWS.debian, but the reason is not there. Without this hack, it doesn't compile and build. I'll add a line

Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)

2011-05-09 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
On 09/05/2011 12:12, Etienne Millon wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: - debian/rules : - why do you remove RPATHs from executables and binary ? It's stated briefly in NEWS.debian, but the reason is not there. Without this hack, it doesn't

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
I updated the package, fixing most of things you pointed. Check it out (retext 1.0.1b-4). Some notes: * Lintian says I should put http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz [0] to debian/watch * I didn't figure out how to rename files while dh_install'ing them, so I have put some mv

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Fix: * Lintian says I should put http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz [0] to debian/watch, but I don't think it works 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com: I updated the package, fixing most of things you pointed. Check it out (retext 1.0.1b-4). Some notes: * Lintian says

Remotely downloaded javascripts in documentation

2011-05-09 Thread Pietro Battiston
Hello, a package of mine, sqlkit (currently only in experimental) provides a documentation in html format which, when browsed, tries to use several javacript applets which the browser retrieves from remote. Though that's a fairly common behaviour for most of the webpages we daily browse, I guess

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi, Il giorno lun, 09/05/2011 alle 16.09 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: Fix: * Lintian says I should put http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz [0] to debian/watch, but I don't think it works version=3 http://sf.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz but it's not enough, because

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
I renamed those files upstream. 2011/5/9 Fabrizio Regalli fab...@fabreg.it: Hi, Il giorno lun, 09/05/2011 alle 16.09 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: Fix: * Lintian says I should put http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz [0] to debian/watch, but I don't think it works

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Can you upload it or I should fix something else? 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com: This will have no effect. I have already renamed that file upstream (but maybe index is not updated yet). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

RFS: assogiate (updated package)

2011-05-09 Thread Vincent Legout
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-2 of my package assogiate. It builds these binary packages: assogiate - editor of the MIME file types database The last upload was in 2008, that's why this new version updates lots of files in the debian directory. Assogiate is

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:07:42PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: I updated the package, fixing most of things you pointed. Check it out (retext 1.0.1b-4). Some notes: * Lintian says I should put http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz [0] to debian/watch * I didn't figure out how

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-05-09 Thread Gunter Königsmann
On So, 2011-05-01 at 18:09 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package oggfix. * Package name: oggfix Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : Gunter Königsmann * URL : http://launchpad.net/oggfix * License : GPL V3+

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Sorry Dmitry, I'm not a DD, so I can't upload your package. Cheers, Fabrizio. Il giorno lun, 09/05/2011 alle 21.07 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: Can you upload it or I should fix something else? 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com: This will have no effect. I have already

Re: Library Question

2011-05-09 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Paul Wise: On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Rainer Dorsch rdor...@web.de wrote: No, navit is a third party application, which I want to package on maemo. Nokia does not ship any version of Navit (they ship the proprietary OVI maps). Freetype belongs to the core

RFS: mcs (updated package)

2011-05-09 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mcs. * Package name: mcs Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk * URL : http://www.atheme.org/projects/mcs * License : BSD Section : libs It builds these binary

Re: Remotely downloaded javascripts in documentation

2011-05-09 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 09 May 2011, Pietro Battiston wrote: Maybe my question looks a bit rhetoric, but I just want to be sure I don't patch more than it's strictly required: do I have, in the end, to remove all the references to remote .js? I don't believe it's currently a requirement, but it's certainly

Re: RFS: creepy

2011-05-09 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi! 2011/5/8 Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au On Sun, 8 May 2011 21:46:20 -0500 Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package creepy. * Package name: creepy Version : 0.1.9.2-1 Upstream Author : Yiannis Kakavas