Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1

2013-12-15 Thread Игорь Пашев
2013/11/24 Boris Pek tehn...@debian.org: I have looked at your debian/copyright in git repo. It may be much simpler: http://paste.debian.net/plain/67414 As you see, all blocks were sorted by license, instead of specific files or copyright holders. Oh, I think I was misunderstanding the

Bug#732084: marked as done (RFS: slowhttptest/1.6-1 [ITP] -- Application layer Denial of Service attacks simulation tool)

2013-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:48:08 +1100 with message-id 201312152048.08573.only...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#732084: RFS: slowhttptest/1.6-1 [ITP] -- Application layer Denial of Service attacks simulation tool has caused the Debian Bug report #732084, regarding RFS:

Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1

2013-12-15 Thread Boris Pek
Hi Igor, I've updated Git [1] and uploaded sources to mentors [2] [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-open-axiom/pkg-open-axiom.git [2] https://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom There is new lintian error tags now: E: open-axiom-databases:

Bug#732188: RFS: freedict -- free bilingual dictionary databases

2013-12-15 Thread Sebastian Humenda
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, after the FreeDict packages got orphaned I started to prepare new Debian packages because Debian as a international project needs free dictionary databases in its archive. Now I'm looking for sponsors for my package(s): * Package

Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1

2013-12-15 Thread Игорь Пашев
2013/12/15 Boris Pek tehn...@debian.org: There is new lintian error tags now: E: open-axiom-databases: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl (And the same for other packages.) Fix should be simple: http://paste.debian.net/plain/70930 (But I have not checked it.) Fixed and

Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1

2013-12-15 Thread Boris Pek
  There is new lintian error tags now:   E: open-axiom-databases: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl   (And the same for other packages.)   Fix should be simple:   http://paste.debian.net/plain/70930   (But I have not checked it.)  Fixed and checked! :-) Uploaded.

Re: Bug#732135: RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5

2013-12-15 Thread Andrei POPESCU
Control: reassign -1 sponsorship-requests On Sb, 14 dec 13, 16:24:20, Bas Couwenberg wrote: Package: sponshorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package spatialite. Please refer to the thread on

Bug#732234: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13

2013-12-15 Thread Jose G. López
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgringotts. * Package name: libgringotts Version : 1:1.2.1-2 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il * URL :

Bug#725447: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.4-1

2013-12-15 Thread Alexander Inyukhin
An updated version 0.7.4-1 of the task-spooler package is available. Package page: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task-spooler The command to get this package directly: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task-spooler/task-spooler_0.7.4-1.dsc Changes since the last

Bug#732135: marked as done (RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5)

2013-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Dec 2013 04:26:11 + with message-id e1vspkx-0003h0...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #732135, regarding RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Which targets need their requirements in “Build-Depends*” declared?

2013-12-15 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy all, Which of the standard ‘debian/rules’ targets need their requirements declared in “Build-Depends” (and “Build-Depends-Indep”)? Policy §7.7 says: Source packages that require certain binary packages to be installed or absent at the time of building the package can declare

Re: Which targets need their requirements in “Build-Depends*” declared?

2013-12-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Which of the standard ‘debian/rules’ targets need their requirements declared in “Build-Depends” (and “Build-Depends-Indep”)? Policy §7.7 says: Source packages that require certain binary packages to be installed or absent at the time