On 2014-04-25 07:58, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
On 24.04.14 10:23:23, Christian Kastner wrote:
I have got another problem. Libstrophe only provides .a file, no .so,
so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
package only -dev, or is it agains policies?
Not that I'm aware
Hello,
I have recently uploaded a new version with correct upstream version
numbers. You can now get the package with dget by using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ipad-charge/ipad-charge_1.1-3.dsc
Changes since last upload:
ipad-charge (1.1-3) unstable;
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package acsccid
* Package name: acsccid
Version : 1.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Advanced Card Systems Ltd. i...@acs.com.hk
* URL : http://acsccid.sourceforge.net/
*
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Alteholz debian-as...@alteholz.de writes:
your debian/copyright needs some additions:
install/unix/systems/Cygwin/values.h is LGPL
gui/GraphLib/libsrc/uimxR5/include/msg.h is some Apple license
libsrc/readline/* is GPL1+
gui/GraphLib/DESCRIPTION has some additional
Hi,
My Debian Maintaing work is recognized as part of my job in my
laboratory (CNRS). Since I have moved from one lab (ipno) to a new one
(csnsm), I have to change my email address as a Debian Maintainer.
My gpg key remain the same and I have added a new uid :
Xavier Grave
On 24-04-14 20:41, Don Armstrong wrote:
The cases where you should split are generally really obvious; if it's
not clear, ask here or in #debian-mentors, and you'll get some
reasonable advice.
Ok, so let me show one of the two issues I have at hand (the other is
currently being discussed on
Hello,
On Apr 25, 2014 12:20 PM, xavier grave xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr
wrote:
My gpg key remain the same and I have added a new uid
Is there a standard procedure to follow to have debian keyring to be
aware of this change ? Or can I just upload a package with the new uid ?
There's no need
Le 25/04/2014 12:20, Andrew Shadura a écrit :
Hello,
On Apr 25, 2014 12:20 PM, xavier grave xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr
mailto:xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr wrote:
My gpg key remain the same and I have added a new uid
Is there a standard procedure to follow to have debian keyring to be
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:57:48AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
I have got another problem. Libstrophe only provides .a file, no .so,
so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
package only -dev, or is it agains policies?
Not that I'm aware of, but I very much
Hi Thorsten,
thank you for the review of the licensing. I now removed all
questionable files -- most important was IMO
gui/GraphLib/libsrc/uimxR5/include/msg.h which was ASCL licensed (not
dfsg-free). It is now replaced by a patch with its original one from netBSD.
Best regards
Ole
On
Hi,
I am upstream as well as would like to become a debian maintainer some
day. Still learning packaging.
Due to the luxury of being upstream as well, the upstream source package
can be formatted in any way I wish. [In this case it is a simple package
with shell scripts only.]
Personally I find
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:23:38PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
I am upstream as well as would like to become a debian maintainer some
day. Still learning packaging.
Due to the luxury of being upstream as well, the upstream source package
can be formatted in any way I wish. [In this case
Andrey Rahmatullin:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:23:38PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
I am upstream as well as would like to become a debian maintainer some
day. Still learning packaging.
Due to the luxury of being upstream as well, the upstream source package
can be formatted in any way I
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:18:41 +
with message-id e1wdipl-00058j...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#745797: fixed in acsccid 1.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #745797,
regarding RFS: acsccid/1.0.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Patrick Schleizer adrela...@riseup.net writes:
I am upstream as well as would like to become a debian maintainer some
day. Still learning packaging.
Due to the luxury of being upstream as well, the upstream source package
can be formatted in any way I wish. [In this case it is a simple
I vaguely recall that static linking is considered a bad idea in Debian,
for much the same reasons that embedded code copies are, but I can't
find this actually written down anywhere.
I'm working on packaging pocl (ITP #676504), which uses libllvm and
libclang. Dynamically linking libclang
Russ Allbery:
Patrick Schleizer adrela...@riseup.net writes:
I am upstream as well as would like to become a debian maintainer some
day. Still learning packaging.
Due to the luxury of being upstream as well, the upstream source package
can be formatted in any way I wish. [In this case it
Patrick Schleizer adrela...@riseup.net writes:
Would a package created that way be allowed to enter Debian (if there
are no other issues)?
I see no reason why not. Whether it's easy to install the software
outside of Debian isn't really something that Debian itself should be that
worried
On 2013-11-13 17:26:02, Matt Flax wrote:
On 12/11/13 00:00, Daniel Lintott wrote:
On 11/11/13 01:18, Matt Flax wrote:
Hi,
Should be working now ... I have uploaded
gtkiostream-1.3.0.fixDeb3.tar.gz to sf.net :
https://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkiostream/files/Version%201.3.0/?
I have
so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
package only -dev, or is it agains policies?
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-static
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package geos
Package name: geos
Version : 3.4.2-5
Upstream Author : GEOS Developers geos-de...@lists.osgeo.org
URL : http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/
License :
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Paul Gevers wrote:
The doublecmd-help package [1] of Graham Inggs (who I sponsor a lot),
is currently building three packages. One package per language that is
provided by upstream. These packages together add up to 12MB, about
4MB per package. Now, if I were a user of one
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
I vaguely recall that static linking is considered a bad idea in Debian, for
much the same reasons that embedded code copies are, but I can't find this
actually written down anywhere.
I'm not sure if there is consensus on this topic
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
I see no reason why not. Whether it's easy to install the software
outside of Debian isn't really something that Debian itself should be that
worried about, as long as the packages in Debian do the right thing.
I'd say we should encourage
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:10:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
Thanks for packaging this library! I'm reviewing this package.
Upstream has new version 0.9.99.20140425, so I just repack it with
latest version.
25 matches
Mail list logo
