Bug#797502: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.20.0-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "pidgin-sipe", whose source code is at: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/pidgin-sipe.git or you may also: dget -x

Re: How much is lintian an expert in english language ?

"Thomas Schmitt" writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> That intransitive form of allow is almost always used >> in combination with the preposition "for". > But why then isn't the lintian check called > "allows to allows for" or "allow is not the right word here" ? In part

Bug#797634: RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "network-config" * Package name: network-config Version : 0.2-2 Upstream Author : Munteanu Alexandru Ionut * URL :

Re: don't use sbuild --dist/-d and other sbuild stuff (was: Re: Questions before my first upload attempt)

Hi, Quoting Jakub Wilk (2015-08-31 16:02:38) > * Johannes Schauer , 2015-08-31, 15:53: > >>From now on, "sbuild --dist sid --arch amd64 path/to/my.dsc" works. > > > >It must be mentioned that a common problem with sbuild is, that the > >.changes file it generates will have a

Re: Issues with neq package iqtree (use Debian packaged zlib in cmake build and others)

Hi Andreas Il Lunedì 31 Agosto 2015 15:57, Andreas Tille ha scritto: > >CMakeFiles/iqtree.dir/gzstream.cpp.o: In function `gzstreambuf::underflow()': >/tmp/buildd/iqtree-1.3.8+dfsg/gzstream.cpp:91: undefined reference to `gzread' >CMakeFiles/iqtree.dir/gzstream.cpp.o: In

Re: don't use sbuild --dist/-d and other sbuild stuff

Hi, On 31/08/15 15:53, Johannes Schauer wrote: > for the pure purpose of building a source package, having devscripts installed > for debuild is not needed. You can instead use dpkg-buildpackage directly. > Though, if you really just want to build the source package, then even better > than

Bug#797407: marked as done (RFS: node-mocha-lcov-reporter/0.0.2-1 -- LCOV reporter for Mocha)

Your message dated Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:13:15 + (UTC) with message-id <1049983676.4145933.1441033995096.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#797407: RFS: node-mocha-lcov-reporter/0.0.2-1 -- LCOV reporter for Mocha has caused the Debian Bug report #797407, regarding RFS:

Re: don't use sbuild --dist/-d and other sbuild stuff (was: Re: Questions before my first upload attempt)

* Johannes Schauer , 2015-08-31, 17:06: So please don't further advertise the -d or --dist option anymore if you actually want to use the -c or --chroot option instead! Um, except that -d/--dist is obligatory. Without it you get: No distribution defined indeed I must've

Re: Looking for a mentor for the OpenSIPS project

Helly Guys, Sorry for the late reply, at the moment I don't have good internet connection, give me one week and I'll work on it. Kind regards, -- Julián Moreno Patiño Debian Developer .''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD} : :' : Free Operating Systems `. `' http://debian.org/ `- GPG

[caffe] one step closer to the final caffe package

Hi folks, (CC'ing people who are interested in package "caffe") It is a good news that the package caffe in anonscm/debian-science/caffe.git builds again. Package caffe-cpu and package caffe-cuda shold be built properly on amd64 and i386 hosts. However it's not quite in a good shape, currently

Bug#792774: RFS: filters/2.54 [ITA]

Er, so sobody did a QA(?) upload of filters_2.54: https://packages.qa.debian.org/f/filters/news/20150830T230043Z.html Marius, was this upload ACKed by you? -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#797636: RFS: variety/0.5.4-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "variety" * Package name: variety Version : 0.5.4-1 Upstream Author : Peter Levi * URL : http://peterlevi.com/variety/ * License

don't use sbuild --dist/-d and other sbuild stuff (was: Re: Questions before my first upload attempt)

Hi, Quoting Danny Edel (2015-08-21 13:43:41) > On 21/08/15 13:21, Danny Edel wrote: > > Once sbuild is setup > > Just to clarify. In this use case (using sbuild as close to buildd as > possible), the steps labeled "for personal use" in > https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Configuration > are *not*

Re: How much is lintian an expert in english language ?

Hi, Russ Allbery wrote: > That intransitive form of allow is almost always used > in combination with the preposition "for". But why then isn't the lintian check called "allows to allows for" or "allow is not the right word here" ? I get the suspicion that "allows to" is a germanism stemming

Bug#792774: RFS: filters/2.54 [ITA]

Jakub Wilk writes: > Er, so sobody did a QA(?) upload of filters_2.54: > https://packages.qa.debian.org/f/filters/news/20150830T230043Z.html > > Marius, was this upload ACKed by you? It wasn't. The uploader (Joey Hess) is the previous maintainer and the upstream. What do I do

Issues with neq package iqtree (use Debian packaged zlib in cmake build and others)

Hi, I intend to package iqtree in the Debian Med team[1] and have some problems to do this properly. Upstream includes some third party libraries that are packaged for Debian (zlib, sprng, eigen) which I tried to get rid of. I was able to eliminate explicite references to zlib and eigen from

Bug#797407: RFS: node-mocha-lcov-reporter/0.0.2-1 -- LCOV reporter for Mocha

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Julien, lets review. 1) changelog, please set target to unstable and refresh the timestamp 2) rules: please remove the newlines after the dh call (oh here we are *really* nitpicking) well, the only issue is the changelog, please fix and I'll do some testing on a

Bug#797502: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.20.0-1 [RC] -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync)

Your message dated Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:30:51 + (UTC) with message-id <1786269920.4006720.1441027851699.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#797502: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.20.0-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync has caused the Debian Bug report #797502,

Re: don't use sbuild --dist/-d and other sbuild stuff (was: Re: Questions before my first upload attempt)

* Johannes Schauer , 2015-08-31, 15:53: From now on, "sbuild --dist sid --arch amd64 path/to/my.dsc" works. It must be mentioned that a common problem with sbuild is, that the .changes file it generates will have a *different* distribution from the one you set in