Bug#818735: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191-10

2016-03-20 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Hi Mattia > > * you're using any-amd64 and any-i386, then why do you explicitly list > hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 too? Ok. I will remove these. > * you're changing only one binary, what about the others? from what I'm > seeing the failure is in the configure step which is done by

Re: git-buildpackage pattern question

2016-03-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Ross Vandegrift writes: > In my packaging, I've worked on 1.0.0, and updated for 1.0.1 and 1.0.2. > So my packaging looks like this: > o---ooooo master > \ \ > o---o 1.0.0o---o 1.1.0 >

git-buildpackage pattern question

2016-03-20 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Hello all, I've been working on packages using git-buildpackage, and have been wondering if there's a better pattern out there. Upstream makes periodic releases, which often receive a few maintenance updates. For upstream, often looks like this: o---ooooo

Bug#813813: RFS: msi-keyboard -- command line tool to change MSI steelseries keyboards color setup

2016-03-20 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Giulio Paci , 2016-03-20, 03:05: I'm looking partly shocked at the commit 6fc1eec66c259cefeeb13453c3ceeb206fb24a55 why did you *substituted* the pristine-tar data? You should always just add them. This is just because upstream never tagged a version, nor released a

Bug#818624: RFS: r-cran-pbdzmq/0.2.1+dfsg-2

2016-03-20 Thread Gordon Ball
On 20/03/16 06:24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:49:21PM +0100, Gordon Ball wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "r-cran-pbdzmq" > > hi there (3rd time ;)) And thanks again. > >>

Bug#818749: marked as done (RFS: presage/0.9.1-2 [RC])

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 17:44:57 + with message-id <20160320174456.gm32...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#818749: RFS: presage/0.9.1-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #818749, regarding RFS: presage/0.9.1-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#818623: RFS: r-cran-uuid/0.1.2-4

2016-03-20 Thread Gordon Ball
On 20/03/16 06:11, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:47:33PM +0100, Gordon Ball wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "r-cran-uuid" >> >> * Package name: r-cran-uuid >>Version : 0.1.2-4 >>

Bug#818788: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0+ds-1 [NEW MAJOR VERSION] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-03-20 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my gmp-ecm pacakge. This package brings to Debian the latest major release of gmp-ecm, a mathematical software suite to `Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method'.

Bug#818749: RFS: presage/0.9.1-2 [RC]

2016-03-20 Thread Matteo Vescovi
> just two things: > > The Vcs-Git you put now requires authentication. Vcs-Git shouldn't > require authentication. > The orig tarball you uploaded to mentors is different than the one > already on the archive, this is worrisome. > What do you expect me to do here? Hi Mattia, Thanks for

Bug#818724: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.6-1

2016-03-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:04:12PM +0300, Alexander Inyukhin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 05:40:59AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > and btw, having debian/* GPL-2+ technically makes upstream unable to > > pull patches from debian/patches/*, as GPL-2+ is incompatible with > > GPL-2 (only).

Re: Google Code and watchfiles

2016-03-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Paul, On 17/03/2016 13:59, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: >>> Indeed I tried that [1] but I didn't get a response. >>> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2016/02/msg3.html >> >> Sounds

Bug#818749: RFS: presage/0.9.1-2 [RC]

2016-03-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:32:56AM +, Matteo Vescovi wrote: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/presage/presage_0.9.1-2.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * Depend on swig instead of swig2.0 (Closes: #816999) > * Fix lintian error in

Bug#818701: marked as done (RFS: webvirtmgr/4.8.9-3 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable])

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:45:36 +0100 with message-id <1458474336.3014.2.ca...@iabsis.com> and subject line Re: Bug#818701: Acknowledgement (RFS: webvirtmgr/4.8.9-3 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]) has caused the Debian Bug report #818701, regarding RFS: webvirtmgr/4.8.9-3

Bug#818749: RFS: presage/0.9.1-2 [RC]

2016-03-20 Thread Matteo Vescovi
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "presage" Package name: presage Version : 0.9.1-2 Upstream Author : matteo.vesc...@yahoo.co.uk URL : http://presage.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL-2

Bug#818622: marked as done (RFS: r-cran-r6/2.1.2-1 [ITP])

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:35:35 + with message-id <20160320113535.gg32...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#818622: RFS: r-cran-r6/2.1.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818622, regarding RFS: r-cran-r6/2.1.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#818622: RFS: r-cran-r6/2.1.2-1

2016-03-20 Thread Gordon Ball
On 20/03/16 06:02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:47:27PM +0100, Gordon Ball wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "r-cran-r6" > > here we go :) > Thank you for taking the time to look at these packages. >> *

Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

2016-03-20 Thread Peter Colberg
Hi Dmitry, Seeing that you have sponsored an impressive number of golang-* packages, would you be willing to sponsor the initial upload of acmetool [1] and its dependencies? [1] https://bugs.debian.org/817865 The tool is promising to be useful to many Debian users that seek a robust, but

Bug#818724: marked as done (RFS: task-spooler/0.7.6-1)

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:53:06 + with message-id <20160320095306.ge32...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#818724: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818724, regarding RFS: task-spooler/0.7.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#816004: RFS: [ITP] python-nameparser/0.3.11-1

2016-03-20 Thread Edward Betts
Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:34:02PM +, Edward Betts wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-nameparser" > > ay. Thanks for reviewing my package. > * debian/changelog: > +

Bug#818724: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.6-1

2016-03-20 Thread Alexander Inyukhin
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 05:40:59AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 07:59:35AM +0300, Alexander Inyukhin wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler" > > sure thing :) > > > dget -x > >

Bug#818735: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191-10

2016-03-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 09:55:55AM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qwtplot3d/qwtplot3d_0.2.7+svn191-10.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * Disable architectures armel and armhf.

Bug#816004: RFS: [ITP] python-nameparser/0.3.11-1

2016-03-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:35:13AM +, Edward Betts wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > * dist/*: > > + why on the earth is that directory filled with tarballs of old > > releases? Please ask upstream to stop shipping such tarballs, or > > (maybe better), why not

Bug#818735: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191-10

2016-03-20 Thread Gudjon I. Gudjonsson
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qwtplot3d" * Package name: qwtplot3d Version : 0.2.7+svn191-10 Upstream Author : Michael Bieber * URL : http://qwtplot3d.sourceforge.net * License:

Bug#817961: RFS: awesfx/0.5.1e-1 [RC] [ITA]

2016-03-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:56:07AM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Current maintainer of awesfx (Ove Kaaven) asked to consider him MIA, so I'm > adopting > the package. where asked todo so? I can see how he is not active, but I'd like to read

Bug#818369: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.10-2)

2016-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:12:52 + (UTC) with message-id <2071520084.1860143.1458137572150.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#818369: RFS: clblas/2.10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #818369, regarding RFS: clblas/2.10-2 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#818701: RFS: webvirtmgr/4.8.9-3 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]

2016-03-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo [disclaimer: I don't sponsor new packages for new people, so even if what I highlight below is fixed I won't sponsor this, sorry!] Hi Oliver, Thanks for your interested in making Debian grow! For a start, you failed to fill correctly the RFS template.. Starting