Bug#950718: RFS: depthcharge-tools/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Tools for ChromeOS firmware/bootloader integration

does what etc., but I thought sending this quick note wouldn't hurt.) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#845311: Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2

(dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@) Hi Jens, Jens Sauer (2016-11-22): > Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this, > I hope everything is alright. It looks to me everything was right on the first attempt. :) > I opened a RFS to find a

Re: Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys

Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho antti-juh...@kaijanaho.fi (16/08/2012): There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not removed in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The proper way to describe what happened to the package is removed from testing - a

Re: Bug#669717: PLEASE DO NOT SPONSOR libextractor/1:0.6.3-4 [ITA]

Bertrand Marc beberk...@gmail.com (21/04/2012): Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libextractor Please don't sponsor this package. It's currently involved in the exiv2 transition, and it's painful enough already. Please make sure to wait for an ACK from the release team

Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)

Hi Jonathan, Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com (26/01/2012): apt-rdepends lists the following reverse dependencies: libconfig8 Reverse Depends: guestfish (1:1.14.8-3) Reverse Depends: guestmount (1:1.14.8-3) Reverse Depends: libconfig8-dev (= 1.3.2-2) Reverse Depends:

Re: Bug#608220: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)

Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de (17/01/2011): I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself. Attaching it now. Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the first place, too. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-qxl

Liang Guo bluestonech...@gmail.com (04/05/2010): Hi! Hello! Have you checked my package ? Any sugestion ? I've been quite busy lately (see the various X-related uploads), but I haven't forgotten about your package. I might come to it in a few days, if everything goes right. Mraw, KiBi.

Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-qxl

Hello Paul. Paul Wise p...@debian.org (05/05/2010): Should XSF packages have the team address in Maintainer? Yes. That's the kind of stuff I'm going to detail later on while reviewing this package. Any idea why upstream installs a .la file for the driver? Surely that isn't needed. Do the

Re: RFS: windowlab (updated package)

Hi, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org (28/03/2010): I get the impression that S. Engelsman took the function interruptibleXNextEvent() from Mark J. Kilgard's contribution to Blender, and then Engelsman wrote the replacing call instead of XNextEvent(). So this patch is part of

Re: RFS: coffeescript

Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org (01/04/2010): Do you think it's sensible to have that packaged in debian (and it's stable releases)? That's a question (but the other one can be replied to with a dummy RC bug prevening migration until it's in shape for a stable release, should the

Re: A meager copyright. Remotely acceptable?

Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se (01/04/2010): I probably prematurely responded to an RFP for 'oftpd', an FTP server for only anonymous access, and only giving read access. Another questions comes to mind: do we need this package? I'd hope several of which we already have can

Re: RFS: grub2-splashimages (updated package; 2nd try) [done]

Krzysztof Burghardt krzysztof.burgha...@gmail.com (26/03/2010): AFAIR tga was supported earliest. OK, thanks. Upload on its way. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: grub2-splashimages (updated package)

Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl (20/03/2010): Dear mentors, Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1 of my package grub2-splashimages. It builds these binary packages: grub2-splashimages - a collection of great GRUB2 splashimages The package appears to be

Re: RFS: grub2-splashimages (updated package; 2nd try)

Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl (24/03/2010): The upload would fix these bugs: 509778, 534210, 565872 Hi, I'm wondering why you're pointing to tga files, given that default images are xpm.gz ones? I don't mind that much, just asking. ;) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description:

Re: lintian 2.3.3 warning: native-package-with-dash-version

Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net (02/03/2010): [Please keep CC] [Done.] Can anyone see any obvious errror, that eludes my eyes? Files available at: $ cat dyndns-2010.0301+gitdd160bd/debian/source/format 3.0 (native) (Enjoy 3.0…) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: create orig.tar.gz

Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz (28/02/2010): Exist some way to create project_version.orig.tar.gz from project-version.tar.gz without complete debianization? And make md5 for both files identical? Sure: mv does that. :) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: CHowning files - or not?

Dominik George d...@naturalnik.de (26/02/2010): OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a difference to my current chown setup. dpkg-statoverride will make sure that the permissions are set everytiem the file is re-installed, but chown in postinst will as well ... And will

Re: RFS: s5 (more DFSG free, refreshed Debian packaging)

Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net (07/01/2010): Dear mentors, Hi, I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. if nobody beats me to it, I could have a look tonight (UTC+1). IRC ping (KiBi) or private mail ping appreciated, I only read -mentors from time to time these days. Mraw,

Re: RFS: scim-array

Wen-Yen Chuang ca...@calno.com (01/01/2010): The upload would fix 1 minor bug which is listed below. Hi, I might take a look later today. IRC ping (KiBi) or private mail ping appreciated. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: scim-array [done]

Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (07/01/2010): I might take a look later today. IRC ping (KiBi) or private mail ping appreciated. Uploaded, thanks. Let's hope I didn't miss anything. First 3.0 package I'm uploading. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: mppenc (NMU, fixes ftbfs)

(Getting rid of all Cc's…) Cristian Greco crist...@regolo.cc (26/11/2009): Please file a bug against the pseudo-package ftp.debian.org requesting mppenc to be removed from the archive, then. It'd be nice to update #540131 accordingly, I almost sponsored the source package linked there. Sounded

Re: Graphviz 2.24.0

David Claughton d...@eclecticdave.com (28/11/2009): So, rather than jumping straight in with a ITA, I wonder if I could ask someone to take a look at what I've done and see if it looks OK? If it's not too far off the mark, I'd be interested in maintaining it. OTOH if the response is go away

Re: Buildd failed: C compiler cannot create executables

Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com (27/11/2009): Which would be...? That KiBi should have checked facts better when reporting the FTBFS bug. The B-D was indeed there. Lalala. :) (Sorry for the lag, I only open -mentors@ from time to time.) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: RFS: pgpool2 (updated package)

Rodolphe Quiédeville rodol...@quiedeville.org (02/12/2009): http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pgpool2/pgpool2_2.2.5-2.dsc For -mentors@'s record, I reviewed this package and made a few remarks, being integrated/worked on. Please hold on any upload. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc

Re: RFS: gmfsk (NMU, fixes ftbfs)

Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org (08/12/2009): I'm rather tempted to sponsor your fixed package. Good call. ;) As for config.{guess,sub}, no need to conditionalize the 'cp'. autotools-dev is in Build-Depends and if it'd stop shipping those files, or in different locations, you want to

Re: Buildd failed: C compiler cannot create executables

Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com (26/11/2009): Your package build-depends on ccache, and it actively enforces it in the debian/rules file. Why is that? I would be willing to bet money that the problem is that buildd's have no (writable) home directory, so ccache fails. Drop the ccache

Re: Buildd failed: C compiler cannot create executables

Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de (27/11/2009): thanks for this informations! Nice to see you noticed the FTBFS yourself. I opened a bug anyway (before opening my =debian-mentors/ folder). :) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: linux-any arch

Benoit Mortier benoit.mort...@opensides.be (21/11/2009): So my question is can we use linux-any today or do we have to fix the problem an other way ? Keep “Architecture: any” for now, possibly FTBFS very early when not on a Linux architecture (you could use a check on DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS in

Re: QA uploadable packages for GNU/kFreeBSD

Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009): Hi Petr, thanks for your email. (For those wondering, I had it privately some days ago, but the reply I was writing got lost.) Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I think this is a perfect task for any perspective

Re: QA uploadable packages for GNU/kFreeBSD

Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009): On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 14:19, Cyril Bruleboisk...@debian.org wrote: Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009): Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I think this is a perfect task for any perspective maintainer to do

Re: QA uploadable packages for GNU/kFreeBSD

Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (28/08/2009): #322207 audiooss: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD I think that one is mostly OK, but I wanted to double-check something too. Uploading. Also, people wanting to work on those packages may want to join #debian-kbsd (OFTC) to coordinate and avoid double

Re: RFS: jabberd14 (updated package) (fix a FTBFS)

Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc (18/08/2009): I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.1.1-3 of package jabberd14. The upload would fix this bug: 542131. Hi, please keep the submitter Cc'd when replying to some bug, or you're not going to receive any feedback, except in rare cases.

Re: RFS: anyremote (updated package)

(Not sure the Cc was needed, keeping it just in case.) Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de (21/01/2009): I'll take care of this. Btw Juan, you could ping me directly, I'll happily sponsor packages for my NMs. Hello here, as discussed on IRC, I finally will do. Note that I'm already sponsoring

Re: RFS: anyremote (updated package)

Juan Angulo Moreno j...@apuntale.com (21/01/2009): http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/anyremote/anyremote_4.15-1.dsc Here we go, based on the source package only: - debian/anyremote-doc.docs: + Extra newline (cosmetic, doesn't hurt) - debian/control: + I don't think

Re: RFS: adtool (bugfix)

Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (18/01/2009): I've also added DM-Upload-Allowed to debian/rules too, in advance of applying for DM status, unless you want it missed out for now. Hi, I'd like to see how the things go on debian-newmaint@ first; so I don't really want to add it

Re: RFS: dict-jargon (updated package)

Ruben Molina rmol...@udea.edu.co (18/01/2009): - You are *not* allowed to change past changelog entries. The changelog Why not? I was unable to find any reference to this on the policy or the developers reference... Indeed, looks like I cannot back up that claim either. Ongoing discussion on

Re: Introducing spurious revisions during sponsorship considered harmful (by some of us)

Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/01/2009): Do you, as a developer, bump the debian revision each time you build a package, are ready to upload it, and discover one final problem with it? Do you, under that scenario, write in the changelog a new bullet point Oh, I botched the rules

Re: Closing bugs, incrementing release number, and uploads to mentors.debian.net

Paul Wise p...@debian.org (19/01/2009): As a sponsor, usually I would do stuff like this: dget http://mentors.foo...-3.dsc apt-get source foo interdiff -z -p1 foo...-1.diff.gz foo...-3.diff.gz | less Why aren't you using “debdiff foo*-{1,2}.dsc”? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc

Re: Closing bugs, incrementing release number, and uploads to mentors.debian.net

Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au (19/01/2009): latest_debian_version=$(rmadison --suite ${suitename} ${packagename} \ | cut -d'|' -f 2 | sed -e 's/^[[:space:]]+//') Beware, you need to limit that to the source (in case there's a binary built that has the same name, and in case there

Re: Closing bugs, incrementing release number, and uploads to mentors.debian.net

Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au (19/01/2009): Yes, that's exactly what I was hoping to get from my packages (and thought it was my responsibility to do so; I wasn't fully aware that the sponsor re-builds the package and uploads the result). (Just for completeness, from a pratical point

Re: Closing bugs, incrementing release number, and uploads to mentors.debian.net

Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/01/2009): It is simple to pass the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage and then dpkg includes all the changes since the specified -v into the .changes file and the bugs get closed just fine. It is very simple to overlook/forget about passing once one is

Re: RFS: dict-jargon (updated package)

Ruben Molina rmol...@udea.edu.co (17/01/2009): I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.4.7-1 of my package dict-jargon. Hello, only had a quick look since I'm missing time, but: - You want to say Build-Depends rather than Depends in the changelog. - You are *not* allowed to change

Re: dpatch and .diff.gz files

Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org (16/01/2009): Examine the ‘foo.diff.gz’ cat foo.diff.gz | lsdiff, for instance I think you wanted “zcat”. Anyway, no need to waste a fork: | lsdiff -z foo.diff.gz Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: gxemul (new upstream)

George Danchev danc...@spnet.net (03/01/2009): (let me know if you'd prefer a version bump). I do prefer version bump myself (since that avoids repetitive reviewing from scratch, which to be honest turned out to gain over some leftover improvements ;-), but I'm not that picky and leave

Re: RFS: gtkperf

Evgeni Golov sarge...@die-welt.net (03/01/2009): Dear mentors (and KiBi o), Taking it. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: adtool (adoption)

Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (27/12/2008): I am seeking a sponsor for my adoption of the package 'adtool' (1.3-2). I'm willing to take a look, I'll get back to you soonish. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: adtool (adoption)

Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (27/12/2008): I'm willing to take a look, I'll get back to you soonish. So, here it goes: - there were some changes to upstream sources in the previous revision, they went away but you're not mentioning it anywhere. Did you lost them or did you trash them

Re: RFS: adtool (adoption)

Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (27/12/2008): Ok, I'll address those now - would you like a version bump? No need, but I can live with it. You can also point poke me on IRC if you like. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: adtool (adoption) [done]

Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (27/12/2008): Same package version is on mentors, if you've time to take a look. After some nitpick on IRC, uploaded. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: ITS: xf86-input-tslib (updated package)

Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/12/2008): I'm only mentioning this as a caution - I don't consider it a practical problem for these particular changes to these particular packages. Once Lenny is released and we migrate both tslib and the xorg driver into unstable and thence into testing,

Re: Considering package removal [glademm]

Christoph Egger christoph.eg...@gmx.de (21/12/2008): Jup I know the procedure, I was more in trouble wether it is reasonable. There is no need I guess to have this done for lenny. You can propose/ask for opinion on debian...@. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Still the rejected package

Pietro Battiston too...@email.it (20/12/2008): an ftp master told me that I can find the reason of the rejection of the package I'm working on (python-shapely, for those who didn't read the Non free license? thread) in folder /srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/reject/ of server merkel.debian.org. It

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (18/12/2008): Hi George Hello both of you, Release have approved the debdiff and asked for the upload; it's on mentors at [1] if you have a chance. Cheers :-) [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.3-1+lenny1.dsc

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (18/12/2008): No problem by me :-) Uploaded as is. I'm assuming you know about lintian and possible enhancements for this package (and that you already fixed that in unstable), and that you chose the minimalist approach for this tpu upload. :) Mraw,

Re: VCS-Git branch

Resul Cetin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (11/12/2008): I want that debcheckout will checkout debian instead of master. Tweak HEAD in the repository to point to the wanted branch (yeah, that shouldn't even exist in a bare repository, etc., but that does exactly what you need, so… enjoy). Mraw, KiBi.

Re: VCS-Git branch

Resul Cetin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (11/12/2008): Sry, but it is not possible to move head because otherwise upstream will kill me. (It is a shared repository with upstream) Just had a quick look at debcheckout's code, it looks like you would need to open a bug against it so that you can specify the

Re: Uploads to experimental instead of unstable

Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] (11/12/2008): Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 13:09 + schrieb Neil Williams: Everyone has to take account of transitions and blocks in unstable between releases, the release freeze itself is just another issue to consider with regard to unstable. Unstable

Re: Someone to 'proofread' a .deb please

Andy Hawkins a...@gently.org.uk (11/12/2008): I'm not sure I understand why the debian directory shouldn't be part of my 'main' release? What problems does this cause? Hello, see [1] for some reasons. Have a nice reading. 1.

Re: Someone to 'proofread' a .deb please

Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (11/12/2008): Packages created by the upstream team are generally exceptionally poor quality. Even if the upstream team is or includes the Debian maintainer, there is no justification for having a .deb on the upstream download page - leave it to the packagers.

Re: RFS: webcpp

Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com (11/12/2008): Why? there's no need to wait until work piles up. If work is committed in $VCS, then no work is piled up. No need to generate buildd, mirror, and upgrade noise only to fix some lintian warnings with no real bug IMHO. But YMMV. Mraw,

Re: RFS: webcpp

Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com (11/12/2008): If it is lintian warning or error then chances are high that there *is* a bug. Chances. 1) ancient-libtool is about porting, is there an FTBFS bug open? Said otherwise: is there an arch where there is an actual FTBFS? 2)

Re: RFS: webcpp

Russ Allbery r...@debian.org (11/12/2008): ancient-libtool was added at the explicit request of the porters because they were seeing obscure bugs and issues on some architectures unless a current version of libtool was used. These sorts of bugs unfortunately are the kind that can be hidden or

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): package-has-a-duplicate-relation depends: libflac++6, libflac++6 (= 1.2.1) According to the man dpkg-gencontrol, just place 'libflac++6(=1.2.1)' before the '${shlibs:Depends}', and dpkg-control with throw away less strong dependency. Wrong

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Andy Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): Please file a bug about this. Umm, I'll try. I'm not sure exactly what that bug report should say! Kind of new to all this Debian packaging stuff (as of this time last week I knew nothing about it!). Short version: “Fix your shlibs.” Slightly

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): Short version: “Fix your shlibs.” Cyril, we've had this discussion before - merely adding symbols does NOT require a SONAME bump. Neil, read. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): Looks like you just found an RC bug in libflac++6 - includes new symbols in version 1.2.1-1 according to mole but the shlibs does not depend on that version: That is not a bug - the package building against it merely has to require that

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): Adding a new function (or several hundred new functions) has absolutely ZERO impact on the SONAME as long as the new functions do not overlap existing functions, change existing functions or require any changes elsewhere in the library that remove

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10/12/2008): Specify the strict version ahead of shlib:Depends and dpkg-shlibdeps does the right thing. Thats a hack. Another workaround for broken shlibs is debian/shlibs.local. A very dirty one. The other being the one recommended by the Policy, but I don't

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Andy Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): My .deb however doesn't depend on a specific version of libflac, is that because there are no versions prior to this available? It is because currently, libflac doesn't declare its shlibs properly. Once this is fixed, and once your package has been

Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions

Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): You're talking about the shlib, as explained in my other message, I was inadvertently folding the two into one. My mistake. Finally. You *do* understand the concept of SONAME and shlibs, right? Yes, but adding symbols properly includes the

Re: RFS: webcpp

Jonathan Wiltshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008): This upload adds the VCS-* fields to debian/control and fixes some minor lintian warnings. Hi, thanks for your attention to details. That doesn't really look like needing an upload right now, though. I'd wait for a bugfix or a new upstream

Re: RFS: sqlline (updated package) [done]

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30/11/2008): http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sqlline/sqlline_1.0.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Hi Damien, it's fine, uploading it. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: commons-vfs (updated package) [done]

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30/11/2008): - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/commons-vfs/commons- vfs_1.0-3.dsc Heh, please don't wrap URL lines. :) I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Sure, looks fine, uploading. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc

Re: RFS: freespeak

Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28/11/2008): I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Taken care of after some modifications. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Preferred version format for svn revisions?

Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/11/2008): yes it it: you have to provide a programmatical way to retrive/generate the orig.tar.gz […] FSVO “have to”. It is clearly tagged as optional in Policy §4.9. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: debconf questions

On 10/11/2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: Hm, I thought you're not supposed to use debconf to display notes, and that NEWS.Debian is preferred. Yeah, otherwise Christian is coming after you; and you don't want that. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please clarify: to bugreport or not bugreport

Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02/11/2008): If the build-deps are satisfied and build-essential is installed, the package should build, so yeah, file bugs at severity serious please. For reference: KiBi Do folks think #505040 is RC or should at least be fixed for lenny? luk_ KiBi: nope,

Re: Please clarify: to bugreport or not bugreport

Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/11/2008): The most foolproof way of testing whether the package in question builds in pbuilder. pbuilder starts with a clean chroot, downloads the build dependencies, installs them and then copies and builds your package in that clean environment. If the

Re: RFS: hpl [hold]

Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21/09/2008): as you may know, I'm going to be more available nowadays. :) As discussed, please people hold on, and don't upload it, since the package name is going to change. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [RFS] python-osd (updated)

Kel Modderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (22/09/2008): BTW, Since the bug in the previous revision practically renders pyosd unusable, in order to have the chance to update this package on Lenny would be OK to change the severity from 'normal' to 'important' and/or the urgency to 'high'? Any

Re: [RFS] python-osd (updated)

Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] (22/09/2008): BTW, if you sponsor this package, the only thing left is to contact RMs explaining the situation, right? Mostly, yes. [0] http://lusers.com.ar/packages/python-osd_0.2.14-4.dsc Hmm, many remarks: - debian/rules modifications aren't documented at

Re: RFS: elfrc

Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (18/09/2008): It builds these binary packages: elfrc - program to convert arbitrary files into elf objects In addition to Patrick's comments, I'd suggest to “s/program to //” this description. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: hpl

Jean Parpaillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/09/2008): Dear mentors, Salut Jean, I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. as you may know, I'm going to be more available nowadays. :) See you tomorrow, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: deb/debian suffixes in packages

Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17/09/2008): the best way to figure out is to send a patch and see if it is accepted ;) IIRC, a bit of standardization got discussed already (on -devel), so a potential patch sender may want to check that first. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: deb/debian suffixes in packages

Al Nikolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16/09/2008): OTOH, devreference is not a collection of common used practices (what is may be sad) I beg to differ. Once a practice is common enough, it'd quite interesting to have it documented so that others can easily follow what de facto consensus has been

Re: RFS: gnome-art-ng

Julien Lavergne [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16/09/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-art-ng. The goal of Gnome-art-ng is to replace gnome-art (non maintained upstream, see http://www.miketech.net/gnome-art/index.php). It provides the same features: […] Maybe you could keep the

Re: RFS: mpop - POP3 mail retriever (updated version) (second try)

Carlos Martín Nieto [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/09/2008): I am looking for someone to upload an updated version of mpop. Cyril Brulebois originally reviewed it, but it has been more than a month since that (I've been away from my computer and my keys), so I'm asking in general again. Yes, sorry

Re: RFS: arping (updated package)

Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02/09/2008): My usual sponsor is Cyril Brulebois (kibi), I've tried asking him for an upload several time, but never gotten a response You had on IRC, and that was “too busy to sponsor anything for now”. Mraw, KiBi — M-x catchup-mode signature.asc

Re: How to remove package completely?

Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17/09/2008): I'd like to remove bluetooth-alsa and libsbc from Debian completely. It was already removed (at my request) from unstable, but it is still in Lenny. How can I remove it from Lenny? Reportbug tell me that package does not exist when trying to

Re: RFS : Mina [Uploaded]

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (29/07/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for my package mina. As said through private mail, finally taken care of. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package) [uploaded]

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/08/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1 of package jzlib. As said through private mail, finally uploaded. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: sqlline [uploaded]

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (29/07/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for my package sqlline. Again, after some private mails, finally uploaded. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: sqlline

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/08/2008): Cyril, did you have time to sponsor this package (if it's ok for you, of course)? Here are some comments: - I assume libjline-java will pull the needed java machinery so you don't have to depend on a java runtime environment; is that

Re: RFS: sqlline

Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05/08/2008): Ok with me. On both parts. :) Thanks for your comments, Ola. Just FTR, I intend to review/sponsor this package, since I'd like to have a better view over Damien's work. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package)

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/08/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1 of package jzlib. Since I'd like to familiarize myself with Damien's work, I intend to review this package. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS and ITA: jzlib (updated package)

Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06/08/2008): Since I'd like to familiarize myself with Damien's work, I intend to review this package. Okay, here we go for a first round: - No need to mention the upstream release number in your first changelog entry, although it does no harm. - You

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03/08/2008): The quilt format is favoured by many, but is certainly not mandatory nor even best practice. That could be understood as the dpkg quilt format. While what is favoured is only using quilt to manage the patches, which makes a huge difference. Mraw,

Re: RFS : Mina

Damien Raude-Morvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02/08/2008): It has been uploaded to my personnal debian repository and maybe (and _had been_, regarding Apache and FTP logs) installed by some debian users. Using -1 for first Debian upload don't seems enforced by debian-policy and I prefer keeping

Re: RFS: procinfo-ng

Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/08/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for my package procinfo-ng. I thought the plan was to replace the old procinfo package without introducing a new one? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: procinfo-ng

Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02/08/2008): I didn't read about replacing, but my plan was a new package (procinfo-ng) and after some testing, if procinfo maintainer agree, obsoleting procinfo (with replace field and a dummy package). [EMAIL PROTECTED] and below. Mraw, KiBi.

  1   2   3   >