Re: Salsa respository

2020-03-09 Thread W. van den Akker
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 14:34 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 01:38:06PM +0100, W. van den Akker wrote: > > The repository for gtkterm for which I am maintainer, is sourced from > > my personal SALSA git environment. > > I want t

Salsa respository

2020-03-09 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi, The repository for gtkterm for which I am maintainer, is sourced from my personal SALSA git environment. I want to migrate to a public SALSA repository but I dont have the rights to do that. Can somebody create the gtkterm repository and give me master rights to that repository? My username

Help packaging archi

2017-12-16 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi list, I am trying to package archi [1]. An editor for archimate models. Archi can be found here [2]. It is my first Java package. Archi is packaged with maven. So this is what I did until so far: - read Java Wiki [3] - read Java Packaging [4] - read MavenHelper [5] To me it look like I have

Bug#881762:

2017-11-18 Thread W. van den Akker
Control: tags - moreinfo

Re: RFS: Uploading new Jabberd2 version into unstable

2015-01-27 Thread W. van den Akker
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 23:41 +0100, W. van den Akker wrote: Hi mentors, Can any of the mentors upload the package Jabberd2 for me to unstable? I tried to get it in, but previous uploaders are to busy or non responsive. So I need another volunteer who is willing to upload it for me

RFS: Uploading new Jabberd2 version into unstable (sorry for the multiple mail)

2015-01-27 Thread W. van den Akker
Sorry for spamming the list. I had to remove some X-SA headers. On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 23:51 +0100, W. van den Akker wrote: Hi mentors, Can any of the mentors upload the package Jabberd2 for me to unstable? I tried to get it in, but previous uploaders are to busy or non responsive. So I

RFS: Uploading new Jabberd2 version into unstable

2015-01-27 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi mentors, Can any of the mentors upload the package Jabberd2 for me to unstable? I tried to get it in, but previous uploaders are to busy or non responsive. So I need another volunteer who is willing to upload it for me. There are a few fixes (missing source file and updated copyright file).

Version after patching

2014-03-28 Thread W van den Akker
Hi, I have a package which have version 2.2.17-1. I applied a patch on the mainstream source code which closes a bug. Should the new version then be 2.2.17-2, or something else? The package is not yet in stable. Greetings, Willem

Uploading package(s). (was Version after patching)

2014-03-28 Thread W van den Akker
, 2014-03-28 at 14:59 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, On 03/28/2014 14:35, W van den Akker wrote: I have a package which have version 2.2.17-1. I applied a patch on the mainstream source code which closes a bug. Should the new version then be 2.2.17-2, or something else? The package is not yet

How to find which Java libs needed

2013-07-09 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi, I have a JAVA package using the ANT build suite. How can I find out which libraries are needed for compiling? I have solved a bunch but a few are to be found. Is there a easy way? Or is it a try and shoot method? This is my first Java package. So any help is appreciated. Greetings, Willem

Why is it so hard to get sponsor (Part 2, was: RFS Jabberd2 / Jabber-muc)

2013-06-18 Thread W. van den Akker
;)) to adopt packages then the packages will stay in bad shape. Why is it so hard to get sponsor and why is there nobody who tries to support the jabber uploads ;) Greetings, Willem On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 07:01 +0200, W. van den Akker wrote: Hi Mentors, Last months I was working with Cleto

Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsor (Part 2, was: RFS Jabberd2 / Jabber-muc)

2013-06-18 Thread W. van den Akker
a sponsor more easily. Sounds good to me. Both jabber packages are already into shape (I hope). But I am working on serveral other packages and support is always welcome :) On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 07:01 +0200, W. van den Akker wrote: I am using Jabber* for about 8 months. It is running

Request for support Jabberd2 / Jabber-muc

2013-06-06 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi Mentors, Last months I was working with Cleto Martin to get Jabberd2 and Jabber-muc into good shape for uploading it. Now the packages are in good shape and I need a mentor to support me for uploading and maintaining it. Cleto does not have enough feeling with Jabber* to support me. I tried

Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsors.....?

2013-02-26 Thread W. van den Akker
If I am reading your (big) changelogs correctly, you are (amongst other things) switching patch-system to quilt, and package new upstream versions - This is a big no-no for the release team during the freeze (see [1]) which we have had since June [2]. This might lower the chances of

Re: Bug#698547: RFS: jabberd2/2.2.17-1 [ITA]

2013-02-09 Thread W. van den Akker
list (Closes: #589304). * Changed van UNRELEASED to unstable. Regards, W. van den Akker _ Email : wvdak...@wilsoft.nl XMPP : wvdak...@wilsoft.nl Anyone interested to sponsor the package? Thx, WIllem

Re: Bug#698548: RFS: jabber-muc/0.8-4 [ITA]

2013-02-09 Thread W. van den Akker
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 13:46 +0100, W. van den Akker wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Send manually to mentors list because my 'normal' address is not subscribed to that list. This one is. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package jabber-muc

Re: Bug#698548: RFS: jabber-muc/0.8-4 [ITA]

2013-01-24 Thread W. van den Akker
option. * Bump standards version to 3.9.4. * Debhelper dependency to 9. - debian/compat: updated to 9. * Added debian/watch file. * Added mu-conference man page. + debian/mu-conference.1 file added. + debian/manpages file added. Regards, W. van den Akker

Bug#698548: RFS: jabber-muc/0.8-4 [ITA]

2013-01-20 Thread W. van den Akker
. * Bump standards version to 3.9.4. * Debhelper dependency to 9. - debian/compat: updated to 9. * Added debian/watch file. * Added mu-conference man page. + debian/mu-conference.1 file added. + debian/manpages file added. Regards, W. van den Akker

RFS: jabberd2/2.2.17-1 [ITA]

2013-01-20 Thread W. van den Akker
). * Changed van UNRELEASED to unstable. Regards, W. van den Akker _ Email : wvdak...@wilsoft.nl XMPP : wvdak...@wilsoft.nl

RFS: scid (updated package)

2009-05-12 Thread W. van den Akker
this package for me. I have contacted the previous maintainer (see also #487771). He agreed that I may continue maintaining the package for Debian. Since the previous upload (aug-08) I have made massive changes in the build proces after some feedback from (Sandro Tosi). Kind regards W. van den Akker

RFS: scid (updated package)

2009-05-12 Thread W. van den Akker
this package for me. I have contacted the previous maintainer (see also #487771). He agreed that I may continue maintaining the package for Debian. Since the previous upload (aug-08) I have made massive changes in the build proces after some feedback from (Sandro Tosi). Kind regards W. van den Akker

RFS: scid (updated package)

2009-04-27 Thread W. van den Akker
get in my full name because the key is not known then :( Kind regards W. van den Akker -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

RFS: scid (updated package)

2009-04-27 Thread W. van den Akker
get in my full name because the key is not known then :( Kind regards W. van den Akker -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: RFS: scid (updated package)

2009-04-27 Thread W. van den Akker
On Monday 27 April 2009 14:32:37 Michal Čihař wrote: Hi Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:00 +0200 (CEST) W. van den Akker list...@wilsoft.nl napsal(a): I have contacted the previous maintainer (see also #487771). He agreed that I may continue maintaining the package for Debian. Since

Re: RFS: scid (updated package).

2008-10-30 Thread W. van den Akker
Dear mentors, I have updated the package and would friendly ask if somebody would sponsor the package. I have added some message where it shows that its 'legal' to upload my package. I hope somebody will sponsor it. After a half year the old maintainer has handed over the package to me. Now

Re: RFS: scid (updated package).

2008-10-30 Thread W. van den Akker
On Thursday 30 October 2008 23:24:25 Sandro Tosi wrote: Hi, On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 23:11, W. van den Akker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear mentors, I have updated the package and would friendly ask if somebody would sponsor the package. I have added some message where it shows that its

RFS: scid (updated package). Just check not upload.

2008-10-24 Thread W. van den Akker
/main/s/scid - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scid/scid_3.6.26-1.dsc I would be glad if someone can check this package for me. Kind regards W. van den akker -- This message has been

No response from MIA

2008-09-26 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi, I am trying to get the maintainership for a package (SCID, et al). Therefore I first in may contacted the original maintainer. But he didnt reply. And also after a second mail in june I got no response. After that I contacted QA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), first in august second time in september.

Re: RFS: dgtdrv: POSIX driver for the DGT chess board

2008-07-27 Thread W. van den Akker
On Sunday 27 July 2008 02:16:02 Chris Bannister wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:45:38PM +0200, W. van den Akker wrote: notebook:/home/wvdakker# /usr/games/dgtdrv2 /dev/ttyUSB0 display info string - info string info string

Re: RFS: dgtdrv: POSIX driver for the DGT chess board

2008-07-24 Thread W. van den Akker
On Monday 14 July 2008, W. van den Akker wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package dgtdrv. * Package name    : dgtdrv   Version         : 1.18-1   Upstream Author : Alexander Wagner * URL             : http://dgtdrv.sourceforge.net * License         : GPL v2   Section

Re: RFS: libdgtnix

2008-07-24 Thread W. van den Akker
On Monday 14 July 2008, you wrote: On Monday 14 July 2008, Ben Finney wrote: W. van den Akker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: libdgtnix-1-9 - Libraries for using DGT chess board libdgtnix-dev - Development libraries dgtnix POSIX driver DGT chess board The package synopsis should

RFS: dgtdrv: POSIX driver for the DGT chess board

2008-07-14 Thread W. van den Akker
be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards W. van den akker -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

RFS: libdgtnix: libraries for using DGT chess board

2008-07-14 Thread W. van den Akker
-debug:the driver is closed I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards W. van den akker -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: RFS: dgtdrv

2008-07-14 Thread W. van den Akker
On Monday 14 July 2008, Ben Finney wrote: W. van den Akker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: dgtdrv - Posix driver for the DGT chess board POSIX is usually treated as an initialism, so should be spelled in all-capitals. A better synopsis would be: POSIX driver for the DGT chess board

Re: RFS: libdgtnix

2008-07-14 Thread W. van den Akker
On Monday 14 July 2008, Ben Finney wrote: W. van den Akker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: libdgtnix-1-9 - Libraries for using DGT chess board libdgtnix-dev - Development libraries dgtnix POSIX driver DGT chess board The package synopsis should be treated as a clause within a sentence

RFS: dgtdrv

2008-07-13 Thread W. van den Akker
detected I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards W. van den akker -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

RFS: libdgtnix

2008-07-13 Thread W. van den Akker
:| | | | | | | | | dgtnix-debug:| | | | | | | | | dgtnix-debug:| | | | | | | | | dgtnix-debug:| | | | |K| | | | dgtnix-debug:Board initialised The board was found dgtnix-debug:the driver is closed I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards W. van den akker -- This message

Re: Prospective package - Redmine #478741

2008-07-08 Thread W. van den Akker
Hello Richard, I would suggest to read the New Maintainers' Guide (http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide). First its important to ensure that Redmine is not conflicting with the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG). See 2.1 of the DFSG. If its not conflicting you can send a ITP (Intent To

RFS: scid (was scid2)

2008-07-01 Thread W. van den Akker
I got on the scid2 package. Which has all been fixed. On Monday 30 June 2008, Sven Joachim wrote: I am not a DD and so cannot sponsor your package , but I have some comments. On 2008-06-30 21:47 +0200, W. van den Akker wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package scid2. What are its

Re: RFS: scid

2008-07-01 Thread W. van den Akker
On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Vincent Bernat wrote: OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du mardi 01 juillet 2008, vers 20:47, W. van den Akker [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait : Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.6.24-1.1 of my package scid. You cannot just steal

RFS: scid2

2008-06-30 Thread W. van den Akker
uploaded this package for me. Kind regards W. van den Akker -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: Scid and TeXSkak

2008-04-02 Thread W. van den Akker
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, W. van den Akker wrote: On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Chris Bannister wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:10:01PM +0200, W. van den Akker wrote: Hi mentors, I would like to be a future maintainer for serveral packages. Two packages which I use are rather out

RFS: Scid and TeXSkak

2008-03-31 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi mentors, I would like to be a future maintainer for serveral packages. Two packages which I use are rather out-dated in the Debian distribution. The previous owner of the Scid package has stopped the development. Scid is now being developed by other people. However the current version in