Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-09-22 Thread Grzegorz Niewisiewicz
Hi! Could you upload my package to the archive? The source is available at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bats/bats_0.2.0-1.dsc I believe it's good enough to be uploaded. I'm glad that I can contribute to Debian! Regards -- Grzegorz Niewisiewicz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-08-12 Thread Grzegorz Niewisiewicz
Hi! I'd like to get some more feedback about my package. The dsc is available at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bats/bats_0.2.0-1.dsc I corrected all issues that were mentioned in this thread. Is the package good enough to be uploaded to the Debian archive? Is there anything more

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-07-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Grzegorz Niewisiewicz grzeg...@niewisiewicz.pl, 2013-06-26, 00:12: Why does it need such a new version of coreutils? (This, on the other hand, might be something worth explaining in the changelog.) This build-dependency makes the package unbuildable on i386, which is stuck with an earlier

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-06-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Grzegorz Niewisiewicz grzeg...@niewisiewicz.pl, 2013-06-25, 00:34: If Lintian was a bit smarter, it would also emit hyphen-used-as-minus-sign for this line: .RI [ -c ] file ... Fixed. What about the header? Currently it reads: bats \- Bash Automated Test Suite Do we want a hyphen or a

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-06-25 Thread Grzegorz Niewisiewicz
On 06/25/2013 01:58 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: Why does it need such a new version of coreutils? (This, on the other hand, might be something worth explaining in the changelog.) This build-dependency makes the package unbuildable on i386, which is stuck with an earlier version of coreutils. I

Re: Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-06-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Grzegorz Niewisiewicz grzeg...@niewisiewicz.pl writes: OK, so I'll change to optional. BTW: what kind of packages should be classified as extra? The distinction between optional and extra is basically pointless these days. That said, I usually classify packages as extra if they are

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-06-24 Thread Grzegorz Niewisiewicz
Hi! First and foremost thank you for thorough review. On 06/17/2013 05:00 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: (I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!) * Grzegorz Niewisiewicz grzeg...@niewisiewicz.pl, 2013-06-16, 22:30: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bats Direct link to .dsc for the lazy:

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-06-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!) * Grzegorz Niewisiewicz grzeg...@niewisiewicz.pl, 2013-06-16, 22:30: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bats Direct link to .dsc for the lazy: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bats/bats_0.2.0-1.dsc Machine-readable d/copyright file

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-06-16 Thread Grzegorz Niewisiewicz
Dear mentors, I uploaded my package [1] to mentors.debian.net some time ago. I have updated it in order to get rid of some lintian errors and warnings. Please review my changes and provide me with further suggestions how to improve my work. Regards, Grzegorz Niewisiewicz [1]

Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

2013-05-31 Thread Grzegorz Niewisiewicz
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bats * Package name: bats Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Sam Stephenson sstephen...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/sstephenson/bats * License :