Jonathan Perry-Houts jonat...@invertedearth.net writes:
Forgive me if this has already been mentioned, but have you looked in to
plplot? There is a program that claims to assist in converting pgplot
dependencies to plplot for exactly this
purpose. http://pg2plplot.sourceforge.net/
I'll have a
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
I am just looking for a solution for this problem...
It might be easier to port the software to something
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
The policy manual says (2.2.2):
| The contrib archive area contains supplemental packages intended to
| work with the Debian distribution, but which require software outside
| of the distribution to either build or function.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
Sure. The bug #690282 is two years old. All I ask here is how this can
be changed, or what the effective way is to support all platforms
here -- especially for a DM without abusing his mentor.
It is not trivial to address this request.
It
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org, 2014-09-02, 11:56:
2. Move it to non-free and get it vetoed as auto-buildable (requires
that its license and the license of its non-free build-dependencies
allow his). This isn't really supposed to work, but AFAIK we trust
people will not abuse
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:43:15PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
It requires manually vetoing which packages from non-free are safe to
be used as contrib build dependencies (much like we manually veto what
packages from non-free can be autobuilt).
Why would we need to manually select them?
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org, 2014-09-02, 11:56:
2. Move it to non-free and get it vetoed as auto-buildable
(requires that its license and the license of its non-free
build-dependencies allow his). This isn't really supposed to
work,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:20:59PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
We want to provide a binary distribution to our end users, and we want
to have best possible experience, right?
We want to provide a libre / *free* distribution to our end users.
Anything else is just tolerated / hosted.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
I am just looking for a solution for this problem...
It might be easier to port the software to something that isn't
non-free so the package can be put in
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
I am just looking for a solution for this problem...
It might be easier to port the software to something that isn't
non-free so the package can be put in main.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
I am just looking for a solution for this problem...
It might be easier to port the software to something that isn't
non-free so the package can be put in main.
As you can see from the bug, dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Forgive me if this has already been mentioned, but have you looked in to
plplot? There is a program that claims to assist in converting pgplot
dependencies to plplot for exactly this purpose.
http://pg2plplot.sourceforge.net/
On August 20, 2014
Hi Ole,
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
package without burding a heavy load to my sponsor and possibly to other
people (porters)? I am willing to do my job here, but I see myself quite
On 2014-08-18 09:46 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Ole,
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
package without burding a heavy load to my sponsor and possibly to other
people (porters)? I am
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
package without burding a heavy load to my sponsor and possibly to other
people (porters)? I am willing to do my job
Hi Ole,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:07:31AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
package without burding a heavy load to my
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
i386 packages can be built in a chroot. For anything else, you can ask on a
porters' mailing list[0]; although it might not be worth the effort.
OK, my sponsor granted be upload rights for the package yet. So, I first
uploaded a new version (source + amd64),
One more question:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 09:46:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder
(after adding non-free), it
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
One more question:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 09:46:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my
[Out of curiosity, is there a reason your name in the From field is
written in a mixture of Latin and Cyrillic scripts?]
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-15, 10:15:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 19:49:
i386 packages can be built in a chroot. For anything else, you can ask
on a porters' mailing list[0]; although it might not be worth the
effort.
Since I am not a DD yet, this would mean that I have to ask for access
to all porter
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 19:49:
i386 packages can be built in a chroot. For anything else, you can
ask on a porters' mailing list[0]; although it might not be worth
the effort.
Since I am not a DD yet, this would mean that I
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
[Out of curiosity, is there a reason your name in the From field is
written in a mixture of Latin and Cyrillic scripts?]
That is my usenet-setup; it just makes it difficult do google my
postings by my name while the name is still human-readable.
* Оlе
Hi,
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local
pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2].
Is there a special thingy that I missed when I specified the dependency?
Also, I am
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 09:46:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local
pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2].
This is bug #690282.
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 09:46:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder
(after adding non-free), it fails to build on the
Hi,
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Also, I am wondering about the section and priority: The control file
[3] and the dsc file has contrib/science and optional, but the PTS lists
them as contrib/misc and extra. Who changed that, why is this done, and
shouldn't the
* Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org, 2014-08-14, 10:26:
Also, I am wondering about the section and priority: The control file
[3] and the dsc file has contrib/science and optional, but the PTS
lists them as contrib/misc and extra. Who changed that, why is this
done, and shouldn't the
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 10:08:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local
pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2].
This is bug #690282.
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 10:08:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder
(after adding non-free), it fails to build on the
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I
haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for
all of them.
Policy, 5.6.6: Priority
| This field represents how important it is that the user have the
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I
haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for
all of them.
Policy, 5.6.6: Priority
| This field
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I
haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for
all of them.
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
I'm pretty sure that default is applied before dak ever sees the binary
package priority. (In other words, it's expanded via the build process
before priorities are added to the *.changes file.)
So it is
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Also, dak is canonical for priorities, and values in binary packages
are only used on initial upload to set the initial override value.
From that point forward, changes have to be made via bugs filed with
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
Initial priorities are set by the ftpmaster that accepted the package from
NEW. They may, or may not match the ones in the package's priority field.
i.e. that field is an _advisory_ field.
This is not what is in the policy. The policy says,
36 matches
Mail list logo
