Re: Multiarch and architecture specific headers

2013-05-15 Thread Игорь Пашев
2013/5/15 Thomas Moulard thomas.moul...@gmail.com: so still I think patching the .pc containing already -I/usr/include/visp to append -I/usr/include/`dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH` is necessary... AFAIK gcc searchs /usr/include/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) first. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Multiarch and architecture specific headers

2013-05-14 Thread Thomas Moulard
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Thomas Moulard thomas.moul...@gmail.com writes: A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h) which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are not the same on i386 and

Re: Multiarch and architecture specific headers

2013-05-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Thomas Moulard thomas.moul...@gmail.com writes: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Thomas Moulard thomas.moul...@gmail.com writes: A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h) which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the

Multiarch and architecture specific headers

2013-05-13 Thread Thomas Moulard
Hello there, I am looking for a solution to fix the following bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707754 A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h) which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are not the same on i386 and

Re: Multiarch and architecture specific headers

2013-05-13 Thread Boris Pek
Hi Thomas, I am looking for a solution to fix the following bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707754 A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h) which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are not the same on i386 and

Re: Multiarch and architecture specific headers

2013-05-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Thomas Moulard thomas.moul...@gmail.com writes: A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h) which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are not the same on i386 and powerpc). So far, the only solution I can think of is moving this header