Bug#968504: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-3 [NMU] [RC] -- Qt5 front-end for QEMU and KVM

2020-12-13 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Dear mentors, Doing a classic RFS mail now if anyone can review this :) I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of "aqemu" to fix this RC bug: #957003 - aqemu: ftbfs with GCC-10 [0] And these additional bugs: #966261 - please drop `qemu' from Depends [1]

Bug#968504: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-3 [NMU] [RC] -- Qt5 front-end for QEMU and KVM

2020-12-05 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Hi, I've done the QA changes to aqemu package for a version aqemu/0.9.2-3 instead of a NMU. I've checked that it actually runs fine and that I'm able to create a VM and run it. I encountered crashes which I've patches and forwarded all existing and new patches to upstream. About the 3 left

Bug#968504: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.4 [NMU] [RC] -- Qt5 front-end for QEMU and KVM

2020-09-15 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Le 15/09/2020 à 18:31, Tobias Frost a écrit : > I wouldn't consider use case not using official debian packages too much… > Instead, lets look what policy says on Depends (omitting non relevant > paragraphs) > > The Depends field should be used if the depended-on package is required for > the

Bug#968504: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.4 [NMU] [RC] -- Qt5 front-end for QEMU and KVM

2020-09-15 Thread Tobias Frost
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 04:33:01PM +0200, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your review :) > > Le 26/08/2020 à 12:39, Tobias Frost a écrit : > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Hi Alexis, > > > > this is an incomplete review, 'cause I ran out of time, lunch break was not > > long >

Bug#968504: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.4 [NMU] [RC] -- Qt5 front-end for QEMU and KVM

2020-09-13 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Hi, Thanks for your review :) Le 26/08/2020 à 12:39, Tobias Frost a écrit : > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Alexis, > > this is an incomplete review, 'cause I ran out of time, lunch break was not > long > enough :-( > > - This should be not an NMU but an QA-Upload so you need to Set the

Bug#968504: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.4 [NMU] [RC] -- Qt5 front-end for QEMU and KVM

2020-08-26 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Alexis, this is an incomplete review, 'cause I ran out of time, lunch break was not long enough :-( - This should be not an NMU but an QA-Upload so you need to Set the maintainer to the QA group, as explained here:

Bug#968504: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.4 [NMU] [RC] -- Qt5 front-end for QEMU and KVM

2020-08-16 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: Ignace Mouzannar Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of "aqemu" to fix this RC bug: #957003 - aqemu: ftbfs with GCC-10 [0] And these additional bugs: #966261 - please drop `qemu' from Depends [1] #874050 -

Bug#930393: marked as done (RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.3 [NMU] [RC] -- Fix #927126 including suggestion from #929342 - aqemu: after updating can't open VMs)

2019-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:47:30 +0200 with message-id <20190614194730.gz8...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at> and subject line Re: Bug#930393: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.3 [NMU] [RC] -- Fix #927126 including suggestion from #929342 - aqemu: after updating can't open VMs has caused the Debi

Bug#930393: RFS: aqemu/0.9.2-2.3 [NMU] [RC] -- Fix #927126 including suggestion from #929342 - aqemu: after updating can't open VMs

2019-06-11 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: Ignace Mouzannar X-Debbugs-CC: Abhijith PA Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of "aqemu" to fix this RC bug: #927126 - aqemu: after updating can't open VMs [0]. This bug was fixed in previous NMU aqemu/0.9.2-2.2

Re: RFS: aqemu (updated package)

2011-08-29 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:03:55AM -0400, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: The upload would fix these bugs: 622722 [1] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/aqemu - dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aqemu/aqemu_0.8.2-1.dsc How is progress on bug 617877 ? Regards, Bart Martens

Re: RFS: aqemu (updated package)

2011-08-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 06:17:12 +, Bart Martens wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:03:55AM -0400, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: The upload would fix these bugs: 622722 [1] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/aqemu - dget -x

Re: RFS: aqemu (updated package)

2011-08-29 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:17, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:03:55AM -0400, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: The upload would fix these bugs: 622722 [1] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/aqemu - dget -x

Re: RFS: aqemu (updated package)

2011-08-29 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:27, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 06:17:12 +, Bart Martens wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:03:55AM -0400, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: The upload would fix these bugs: 622722 [1] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/aqemu -

Re: RFS: aqemu (updated package)

2011-08-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:43:14 -0400, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: How is progress on bug 617877 ? The patch is applied and the bug closes in the changelog of 0.8.2-1; not sure why it's mentioned in the mail ... insnot/ins I had re-uploaded the package in the meantime. Sorry for the noise.. ;)

Re: RFS: aqemu (updated package)

2011-08-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:03:55 -0400, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: I would be glad if someone could review/upload this package for me. Uploaded as is. Thanks for your work! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux

RFS: aqemu (updated package)

2011-08-28 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-1 of my package aqemu. It builds these binary packages: aqemu - Qt4 front-end for QEMU and KVM The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 622722 Here is the relevant changelog section:

Re: RFS: aqemu (new version 0.8.1)

2011-01-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 24 January 2011 00:58:52 gregor herrmann wrote: - debian/control: libqt4-dev (= 4.4): the version is not necessary, lenny has already 4.4.3 (and etch with 4.2.1 is archived) Note that these unnecessary versioned dependencies can be detected by latest version of libconfig-model-perl

Re: RFS: aqemu (new version 0.8.1)

2011-01-24 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 00:58, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: Hi gregor! On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:14:26 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.1-1 of my package aqemu. [1] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aqemu - Source

Re: RFS: aqemu (new version 0.8.1)

2011-01-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:35:45 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Looks good, tiny remarks: - upstream now ships aqemu.1, so you can remove debian/aqemu.1 (and  debian/aqemu.manpages, the manpage gets installed  by CMake) - debian/control: libqt4-dev (= 4.4): the version is not necessary,  

Re: RFS: aqemu (new version 0.8.1)

2011-01-24 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:52, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:35:45 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Looks good, tiny remarks: - upstream now ships aqemu.1, so you can remove debian/aqemu.1 (and  debian/aqemu.manpages, the manpage gets installed  by CMake)

Re: RFS: aqemu (new version 0.8.1)

2011-01-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:22:39 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Hm, without trying, but can't just add the files to debian/clean? That would save the override. You are absolutely right, that did the trick! Great, thanks for the quick improvement! Uploaded. Cheers, gregor -- .''`.

RFS: aqemu (new version 0.8.1)

2011-01-23 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.1-1 of my package aqemu. It builds these binary packages: aqemu - Qt4 front-end for QEMU and KVM The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 607947 Here is the relevant changelog section:

Re: RFS: aqemu (new version 0.8.1)

2011-01-23 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:14:26 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.1-1 of my package aqemu. [1] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aqemu - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-22 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday 21 November 2010 22:41:07 Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Looks much better now, but I think there's another (hopefully last) problem in d/copyright (yes, that's often the hardest file ...): Definitely.. Ignace, could you please send me your copyright file? It does sound like an

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-22 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hi Dominique, On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:01, Dominique Dumont dominique.dum...@hp.com wrote: On Sunday 21 November 2010 22:41:07 Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Looks much better now, but I think there's another (hopefully last) problem in d/copyright (yes, that's often the hardest file ...):

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-22 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 17:04, Dominique Dumont dominique.dum...@hp.com wrote: On Monday 22 November 2010 16:17:39 Ignace Mouzannar wrote: It does sound like an interesting test case for my DEP-5 parser based on Config::Model ;-) I hope it will be helpful. :) Well, DEP-5 parser found :

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-22 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 22 November 2010 16:17:39 Ignace Mouzannar wrote: It does sound like an interesting test case for my DEP-5 parser based on Config::Model ;-) I hope it will be helpful. :) Well, DEP-5 parser found : - french and english for license was mixed up (e.g. licen*c*e instead of

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:04:18 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: - french and english for license was mixed up (e.g. licen*c*e instead of licen*s*e). I often do the same mistake ;-) Isn't this more like en_GB vs. en_US? (Ok, maybe not in this case :)) - First paragraph lacks 'Files:*' (I grant

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-22 Thread francis southern
On 22 November 2010 11:07, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:04:18 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: - french and english for license was mixed up (e.g. licen*c*e instead of licen*s*e). I often do the same mistake ;-) Isn't this more like en_GB vs. en_US? (Ok,

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-21 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hello gregoa, On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 22:50, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:16:26 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.0-1 of my package aqemu. A quick look: - debian/rules: you don't need the

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-21 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 17:20, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:59:44 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Hello gregoa, Salut! Salut! :) Thanks for all your quick fixes. Thank *you* for your reviews. - debian/copyright: the main copyright is 2008-2010 now,  

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:59:44 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Hello gregoa, Salut! Thanks for all your quick fixes. - debian/copyright: the main copyright is 2008-2010 now,  Embedded_Display/remoteview.cpp also needs 2010 for Andrey Rijov  (I haven't checked the other notices) I have

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:29:01 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Thanks for all your quick fixes. Thank *you* for your reviews. You're welcome. I'm afraid there's at least one third-party copyright missing: cmake/modules/FindLibVNCServer.cmake and cmake/modules/CheckPointerMember.cmake.

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-21 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 21:56, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:29:01 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: I'm afraid there's at least one third-party copyright missing: cmake/modules/FindLibVNCServer.cmake and cmake/modules/CheckPointerMember.cmake. Doing the

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:41:07 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: I guess you have to find this COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS file and copy the license terms from there ... I found the SVN repositories of these files [1] [2], and their respective COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS [3] [4] which are identical. I have

RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-20 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.0-1 of my package aqemu. It builds these binary packages: aqemu - Qt4 front-end for QEMU and KVM The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 597480 Here is the relevant changelog section:

Re: RFS: aqemu (update)

2010-11-20 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:16:26 +0100, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.0-1 of my package aqemu. A quick look: - debian/rules: you don't need the override_dh_auto_clean, if you put the files-to-be-deleted into debian/clean dh_clean picks them up (note

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-25 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hello Rogério, Using aqemu, a user can setup an advanced qemu configuration without having to manually input qemu flags;  which could appear to be very convenient for inexperienced qemu users. This is something that I would expect from any front-end: if it doesn't do that, it's failed in

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-25 Thread zufus
Hello Marco, sorry, I spoke too early :) I just found something to correct: your orig.tar.gz file contains the debian dir, while the upstream, does not. I think you should remove it and place it in the diff.gz file. It is ok to keep debian/ in the orig.tar.gz if it is also contained in

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-25 Thread Marco Presi
Hi, Ignace. On Sep 24 2009, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Hello Eugene, Before looking at the package, there is already a Qt4 front-end in Debian repositories - it's 'qtemu' package. What are the advantages of aqemu over qtemu? So, is there anything that an uninformed user that uses qemu

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-25 Thread zufus
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aqemu. Hi, sorry, I spoke too early :) I just found something to correct: your orig.tar.gz file contains the debian dir, while the upstream, does not. I think you should remove it and place it in the diff.gz file. It is ok to keep

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-25 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Re Marco, This is exactly what I said... the upstream directory does not contain the debian/ dir. BUT your orig.tar.gz file actually contains the debian/ dir. This is wrong. The debian/ dir should be contained only in the .diff.gz file. If you have problems in doing it right, we can talk on

RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-24 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aqemu. * Package name: aqemu Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Andrey Rijov rd...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://aqemu.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds these

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-24 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Ignace, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aqemu. * Package name: aqemu Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Andrey Rijov rd...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://aqemu.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-24 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hello Eugene, Before looking at the package, there is already a Qt4 front-end in Debian repositories - it's 'qtemu' package. What are the advantages of aqemu over qtemu? Other than offering a qemu Qt4 front-end alternative for debian users, aqemu lets you configure most of Qemu's options

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-24 Thread Marco Presi
Il giorno gio, 24/09/2009 alle 12.06 +0200, Ignace Mouzannar ha scritto: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aqemu. I could work on it. If it is OK, I'll upload it shortly. Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

[Fwd: Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)]

2009-09-24 Thread zufus
-- Messaggio originale --- Oggetto: Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try) Da: zu...@serverina.hacknight.org Data:Gio, 24 Settembre 2009 9:51 pm A: Ignace Mouzannar mouzan...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: aqemu (3rd try)

2009-09-24 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Ignace. On Sep 24 2009, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: Hello Eugene, Before looking at the package, there is already a Qt4 front-end in Debian repositories - it's 'qtemu' package. What are the advantages of aqemu over qtemu? Other than offering a qemu Qt4 front-end alternative for debian

RFS: aqemu (2nd try)

2009-07-16 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aqemu. * Package name: aqemu Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Andrey Rijov rd...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://aqemu.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds these binary

Re: RFS: aqemu

2009-06-28 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hello, 1. my words is not clear in last mail. I want to say: if you don't know which library version your package should depends on, I prefer don't write the version. and use the last version in debian is a bad practice, it will prevent any backport works. Done. 2. why the arch is only

Re: RFS: aqemu

2009-06-27 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 07:03, Ignace Mouzannarmouzan...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aqemu. * Package name    : aqemu  Version         : 0.7.2-1  Upstream Author : Andrey Rijov rd...@users.sourceforge.net * URL             :

Re: RFS: aqemu

2009-06-27 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hello, do you really need libqt4-dev = 4.5.1-2? I think 4.4 is enough, as the configure.sh said, and we often does not include -2 in the build depends version. I have corrected the dependency on libqt4-dev to (= 4.4), and removed all the release dependencies. A new version has been

Re: RFS: aqemu

2009-06-27 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 01:12, Ignace Mouzannarmouzan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, do you really need libqt4-dev = 4.5.1-2? I think 4.4 is enough, as the configure.sh said, and we often does not include -2 in the build depends version. I have corrected the dependency on libqt4-dev to

RFS: aqemu

2009-06-24 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aqemu. * Package name: aqemu Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Andrey Rijov rd...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://aqemu.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds these