Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

David Paleino wrote: Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:57:17 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). Which is finally ready, thanks to Ove Kaaven, who avoided me going mad, and to Julien Valroff, who helped as well. dget

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Michael Biebl wrote: David Paleino wrote: Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:57:17 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). Which is finally ready, thanks to Ove Kaaven, who avoided me going mad, and to Julien Valroff, who helped as well.

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:32:57 +0100 Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Michael Biebl wrote: David Paleino wrote: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gthumb/gthumb_2.10.8-1.dsc This version has two serious bugs: Oh, and another thing: the

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

David Paleino wrote: Il giorno Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:32:57 +0100 Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Michael Biebl wrote: David Paleino wrote: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gthumb/gthumb_2.10.8-1.dsc This version has two serious bugs: Oh, and another thing: the

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

David Paleino wrote: Il giorno Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:52:03 +0100 Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Could you please make the yelp dependency a Recommends? May I ask why? Sure. I believe yelp is better suited as a Depends (AFAIK, to read gnome-doc documentation, you need yelp)

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:53:37 +0100 Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: David Paleino wrote: I believe yelp is better suited as a Depends (AFAIK, to read gnome-doc documentation, you need yelp) gthumbs main purpose is to display images. It works perfectly fine without an

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:52:03 +0100 Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Could you please make the yelp dependency a Recommends? May I ask why? I believe yelp is better suited as a Depends (AFAIK, to read gnome-doc documentation, you need yelp) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

On 13/01/2008, David Paleino wrote: Could you please make the yelp dependency a Recommends? May I ask why? So that it gets pulled in by default. But so that one can still choose not to install yelp at all, e.g. because one isn't interested at all by documentation (e.g. because online helps

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

David Paleino wrote: Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:57:17 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). Which is finally ready, thanks to Ove Kaaven, who avoided me going mad, and to Julien Valroff, who helped as well. Could you please make

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:57:17 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). Which is finally ready, thanks to Ove Kaaven, who avoided me going mad, and to Julien Valroff, who helped as well. dget

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:02:58 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Please don't upload it yet. I've just found out a minor issue during build: after svn-buildpackage the sources are left modified. Looking at it right now. Ok, I can't solve this, thus asking for help.

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Hi David, Le jeudi 03 janvier 2008 à 19:22 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : [...] .. $ svn status M src/GNOME_GThumb.h $ This isn't, obviously, optimal: I'd expect a FTBFS if this package gets uploaded, and I wouldn't know how to fix it, since I'm not able right now. Just a

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:28:33 +0100 Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi David, Hi Julien, Le jeudi 03 janvier 2008 à 19:22 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : [...] .. $ svn status M src/GNOME_GThumb.h $ This isn't, obviously, optimal: I'd expect a FTBFS if

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Hi Ove, (please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list) Il giorno Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:27:55 +0100 Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: David Paleino skrev: Upstream's tarball provides a file, src/GNOME_GThumb.h, which is dynamically generated during the build. Now, it happens that

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

David Paleino skrev: Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:02:58 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Please don't upload it yet. I've just found out a minor issue during build: after svn-buildpackage the sources are left modified. Looking at it right now. Ok, I can't solve this, thus

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

David Paleino skrev: I'm not recreating the tarball. The first times I was making packages, my sponsors told me that the result of debuild clean (or fakeroot debian/rules clean) had to be the same as the original tarball unpacked + debian/. Is this wrong? I'd qualify that somewhat. It's

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:59:37 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1 I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). ... The package is not lintian clean, it has 3 overrides: - gthumb: menu-icon-missing

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:57:17 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). (sorry for keeping quoting myself, just didn't want to start a new thread) Please don't upload it yet. I've just found out a minor issue during build: after

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Le dimanche 30 décembre 2007 à 08:50 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 08:32:20 +0100 Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I have built the new release, but still an issue with libgthumb.so - gthumb can't find the library: $ ldd /usr/bin/gthumb | grep

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:55:55 +0100 Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: However, on my system: $ ldd /usr/bin/gthumb | grep libgthumb libgthumb.so = /usr/lib/gthumb/libgthumb.so (0xb7ef9000) Are you sure you have the right package? What does $ dpkg -c

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:55:55 +0100 Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... Creating a symlink in /usr/lib does work: $ ldd /usr/bin/gthumb | grep libgthumb libgthumb.so = /usr/lib/libgthumb.so (0x2b6e5c45a000) Strangely enough, I've just reproduced it.

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Le dimanche 30 décembre 2007 à 10:02 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:55:55 +0100 [...] This is kinda weird. It is, yes. Try removing (and purging, let's be sure) the package, deleting all of what you downloaded until now, dget -x the dsc file and recompile it.

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

(sorry for quoting myself) Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:25:25 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... Now, there are two possible solutions: a) creating a symlink (do I need to create a shlibs?) b) moving everything from /usr/lib/gthumb/ to /usr/lib/ I believe I've found

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:37:36 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: (sorry for quoting myself) ... I'm now compiling with libdir and libexecdir to /usr/lib, I'll also need a shlibs file and some lintian overrides (package name and SONAME, and some other). I'll report

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:18:36 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I'll wait for a reply before proceeding. In the meanwhile, I've built a package which works just fine: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gthumb/gthumb_2.10.7-1.dsc It puts everything in

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:18:01 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... To me, if there are not other solutions for the unversioned SONAME, this package is ready to be uploaded. Final version: using -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/gthumb. The package is now ready. Cheers, David --

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:59:37 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1 of the package gthumb, which I'm adopting. ... The upload would fix the ITA bug #457591 It would currently also close (I've

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Hi David, Le samedi 29 décembre 2007 à 19:16 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:59:37 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1 of the package gthumb, which I'm adopting.

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:18:04 +0100 Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hi David, Hi Julien, I have built the package from the sources available on mentors, and gthumb cannot load: $ LANG=C gthumb gthumb: error while loading shared libraries: libgthumb.so: cannot open

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:28:30 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I must have missed it, let me check the source, I'll report as soon as I get something :) The package now is fully functional, I've also integrated a patch for yet another bug (#452929). Please

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Hi David, Le samedi 29 décembre 2007 à 21:29 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:28:30 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I must have missed it, let me check the source, I'll report as soon as I get something :) The package now is fully

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Le dimanche 30 décembre 2007 à 08:30 +0100, Julien Valroff a écrit : Hi David, Le samedi 29 décembre 2007 à 21:29 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:28:30 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... I must have missed it, let me check the

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 08:32:20 +0100 Julien Valroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I have built the new release, but still an issue with libgthumb.so - gthumb can't find the library: $ ldd /usr/bin/gthumb | grep not found libgthumb.so = not found I attach the build log as

RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1 of the package gthumb, which I'm adopting. It builds these binary packages: gthumb - an image viewer and browser gthumb-data - an image viewer and browser - arch-independent files The -data package is new, and is there

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:59:37PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1 of the package gthumb, which I'm adopting. The package is not lintian clean, it has 3 overrides: - gthumb: no-shlibs-control-file and

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:22:59 -0600 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Don't override this, it *is* a bug in the package. The propper fix is to move the library into a private directory inside /usr/lib, say /usr/lib/gthumb Thank you. Should I call ldconfig in

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Don't override this, it *is* a bug in the package. The propper fix is to move the library into a private directory inside /usr/lib, say /usr/lib/gthumb Thank you. Should I call ldconfig in

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:02:10 -0800 Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Should I call ldconfig in post{inst,rm} also in this case then? Lintian complains about it: it says it's useless. Should I override this, or is it really useless?