Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-22 Thread LI Daobing
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 23:37, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: LI Daobing wrote: Hello, On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-21 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-21 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: Hello, On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-21 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: Hello, On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-19 Thread Monty Taylor
Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If you have a chance, could you take a look at it for me? Thanks! Monty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-19 Thread LI Daobing
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If you have a chance, could you take a look at it for me? consider always post

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-16 Thread LI Daobing
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 00:22, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: LI Daobing wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: LI Daobing wrote: 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same file in memstat package[1], one solution is

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-16 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 00:32, Matthias Julius m...@julius-net.net wrote: LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com writes: 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file. Is that a policy/best practice for library packages? ok, consider there is no conclusion here. you can keep

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-16 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 00:22, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: LI Daobing wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: LI Daobing wrote: 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same file in memstat

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-14 Thread LI Daobing
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: LI Daobing wrote: 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-14 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: LI Daobing wrote: 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-14 Thread Matthias Julius
LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com writes: 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file. Is that a policy/best practice for library packages? ok, consider there is no conclusion here. you can keep this file there. :) But there seems to be a preference to remove it if rdepends

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:35 -0700, Monty Taylor wrote: 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file. Is that a policy/best practice for library packages? I've uploaded a new copy to mentors with 1 and 2 fixed. I'd like to know more about 3 before making that change.

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-12 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:58, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libmemcached. * Package name    : libmemcached  Version         : 0.28-1  Upstream Author : Brian Aker * URL             :

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-12 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: 1. the debian policy version should be 3.8.1 Oops. 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian

RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-11 Thread Monty Taylor
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libmemcached. * Package name: libmemcached Version : 0.28-1 Upstream Author : Brian Aker * URL : http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html * License : BSD Section : libs It builds these binary