Re: RFS: libplist (Adopted, updated package)

Hi, Yes, strangely, the symbols are different if the package is build on i386 or on amd64. I removed the symbols file until I find why there is such behavior. The actual version on mentors should build fine now. Regards, Julien Lavergne Le samedi 21 novembre 2009 à 09:09 -0400, Julien Lavergne

Re: RFS: libplist (Adopted, updated package)

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:10:59 +0100 Julien Lavergne julien.laver...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yes, strangely, the symbols are different if the package is build on i386 or on amd64. I removed the symbols file until I find why there is such behavior. The actual version on mentors should build fine

Re: RFS: libplist (Adopted, updated package)

Sorry for the bizzare spam-like From on that last message. Experimental mail setup gone wild... d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: libplist (Adopted, updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-1 of package libplist. It was orphaned and I would like to take over its maintenance. The ITA bug is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548594 libplist is the first package of the libiphone stack, providing access