Your message dated Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:14:15 + (UTC)
with message-id <423627533.1888939.1442564055100.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping
has caused the Debian Bug report #787396,
regarding RFS: mupen64plus-qt/1.8-1 [ITP] -- Basic la
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mupen64plus-qt
This is a basic launcher for the mupen64plus-ui-console frontend, with support
of game information and cover images. It was adapted from CEN64-Qt to work with
Mupen64Plus.
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:23:43 +
with message-id e1vfnxf-0008jg...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: mupen64plus-video-glide64mk2/2.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #715149,
regarding RFS: mupen64plus-video-glide64mk2/2.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mupen64plus-video-glide64mk2
* Package name: mupen64plus-video-glide64mk2
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Richard 'Richard42' Goedeken
rich...@fascinationsoftware.com
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 09:44:41 +0200
with message-id 2085065.kalqhqp...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org
and subject line Fwd: Accepted mupen64plus-core 1.99.5-3 (source all amd64)
has caused the Debian Bug report #671013,
regarding RFS: mupen64plus-core/1.99.5-3
to be marked as done
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 671013 pending
Bug #671013 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: mupen64plus-core/1.99.5-3
Added tag(s) pending.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
671013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mupen64plus-core
* Package name: mupen64plus-core
Version : 1.99.5-3
Upstream Author : Richard 'Richard42' Goedeken
rich...@fascinationsoftware.com
* URL :
On Saturday 22 January 2011 11:32:39 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of mupen64plus. This version
was splitted in different source package because the source bundle archive
isn't dfsg compliant and doesn't contain all plugins.
Piotr
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of mupen64plus. This version
was splitted in different source package because the source bundle archive
isn't dfsg compliant and doesn't contain all plugins.
This upload is for experimental because I got different request on the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of mupen64plus. This version
was splitted in different source package because the source bundle archive
isn't dfsg compliant and doesn't contain all plugins.
This upload is for experimental because I got different request on the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of mupen64plus. This version
was splitted in different source package because the source bundle archive
isn't dfsg compliant and doesn't contain all plugins.
This upload is for experimental because I got different request on the
[Sven Eckelmann, 2010-03-15]
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5+dfsg1-8
of my package mupen64plus.
uploaded
--
http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5+dfsg1-8
of my package mupen64plus.
It builds these binary packages:
mupen64plus - plugin-based Nintendo 64 emulator
mupen64plus-dbg - mupen64plus debug symbols package
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be
[Sven Eckelmann, 2009-06-14]
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:13:31 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
* can you do with lzma something similar to you did with bz2 and zlib?
No, not at the moment. The lzma-dev doesn't provide a shared object. I
changed
it now to link against the static libraries
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:33:01 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
a good reason to disable that patch right now. Maybe there is a little bit
confusion about lzma/lzma-dev/liblzma/libxz/7z.
when 111-system-unlzma.patch is enabled, I'm getting segmentation fault
every time I try to start the
uploaded
--
http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Sven Eckelmann, 2009-06-14]
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:22:21 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
Please remind me that one of you has DM status after few uploads in a
row without my comments and I'll try to figure something else in
order not to loose a sponsoree ;-)
Hm, I don't understand what
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:13:31 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
* can you do with lzma something similar to you did with bz2 and zlib?
No, not at the moment. The lzma-dev doesn't provide a shared object. I
changed
it now to link against the static libraries from lzma-dev instead of the
[tobi, 2009-06-11]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mupen64plus/mupen64plus_1.5+dfsg1-2.dsc
* Please remove Dm-Upload-Allowed, I don't know you guys and even if I
would, I'd most probably not upload a NEW package with this flag.
Please remind me that one of you has DM status
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:22:21 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
* Please remove Dm-Upload-Allowed, I don't know you guys and even if I
would, I'd most probably not upload a NEW package with this flag.
If it is your opinion then I will change that.
Please remind me that one of you has DM status
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Sven Eckelmannsven.eckelm...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:22:21 -0700 Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
* Please remove Dm-Upload-Allowed, I don't know you guys and even if I
would, I'd most probably not upload a NEW package with this flag.
If it is your opinion
Hi,
I just wanted to add some notes. Mupen64Plus is in my opinion the best working
n64 emulator on unix systems with an active upstream. mupen64plus is a fork of
the ~2005 stopped project mupen64[4] with many enhancements and bug-fixes. It
uses a plug-in architecture to make it easy to exchange
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mupen64plus.
* Package name: mupen64plus
Version : 1.5+dfsg1-2
Upstream Author : Richard Goedeken rich...@fascinationsoftware.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mupen64plus/
* License : GPL-2+
Section
Hi again!
I am the guy who want to package Mupen64plus, but now I own the ITP.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mupen64plus.
* Package name: mupen64plus
Version : 1.5-2
Upstream Author : [I'm not sure about this field]
* URL :
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:36:22PM -0600, fgatuno@gmail.com wrote:
Upstream Author : [I'm not sure about this field]
The name and address for the author of mupen64plus.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
You've run lintian across your package, right? The output is
I CC'd debian-mentors; I presume you forgot to CC it. If you want
private email off of a list, please say so in the message. (But this
is not ideal.)
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Félix Arreola Rodríguez
fgatuno@gmail.com wrote:
I hijack an ITP?
Normally, the person who owns the ITP is
, I now understand it. But, I wirte a reply in the ITP
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513322). I'm not
sure about how to handle this. I need to contact this person (William
Pitcock), becuase he is trying to package it.
Well, meanwhile, in mentors.debian.net, i will suspend
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mupen64plus.
* Package name: mupen64plus
Version : 1.5-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mupen64plus/
* License : GPL (but it's on non-free section
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:44 PM, fgatuno@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mupen64plus.
* Package name : mupen64plus
Version : 1.5-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL :
29 matches
Mail list logo
